That’s a good summary. Google Gemini is no better. Type in a question and it starts off great but then devolves into other brands, other steps to do something that isn’t related to the thing you asked. It’s just terrible and someone will sue them over it next year. Just wait.
Not a fan of avoiding clickbait titles & thumbnails, because then you still click on such videos and support those practices. I rather just block all channels using those tactics.
Nowadays, yes. But that comes down to the fact that most people don't care, which continuously degrades YT content to what it is now, and further degrades it into even more of an absurdity. That's why I barely watch YT videos anymore, and I was a pretty active viewer in the past, being with the platform pretty much since its creation. Boycotts unfortunately only work if people collectively pull through, but at least I can say that I personally stay out of the nonsense. It's not like there aren't other things I could be doing.
It goes without saying that this shit doesn’t really understand what’s outputting; it’s picking words together and parsing a grammatically coherent whole, with barely any regard to semantics (meaning).
It should not be trying to provide you info directly, it should be showing you where to find it. For example, linking this or this*.
To add injury in this case it isn’t even providing you info, it’s bossing you around. Typical Microsoft “don’t inform a user, tell it [yes, “it”] what it should be doing” mindset. Specially bad in this case because cost vs. benefit varies a fair bit depending on where you are, often there’s no single “right” answer.
*OP, check those two links, they might be useful for you.
I had a coworker for a while who was maddeningly religious. The type who goes around making it his life’s mission trying to convert people – that is to say, constantly arguing with them, and pestering people about religion incessantly even in situations where it was totally inappropriate. Except he hung around in his own Evangelical echo chambers too much and apparently did not quite spend enough time sharpening his skills arguing with atheists on the internet. Towards the end, before he was fired, I was the only person he’d engage with anymore because I would at least argue with him rather than everyone else who would just tell him to fuck off.
Anyway, one day he came at me with the old, “If we came from monkeys, why are there still monkeys?” I let the monkeys/apes part go. Instead asked him if dogs came from wolves, how come there are still wolves?
He stood there with this vacant look on his face for like five full seconds. I know this sounds like one of those “and then everyone clapped” stories, but he really did. He should have had a little spinning loading icon hovering over his head. He didn’t have a snappy pre-memorized comeback for that one. (I believe the accepted creationist answer would be to mumble something about “microevolution vs. macroevolution,” or “humans breeding animals is different and doesn’t count,” or similar.)
Unfortunately, this experience did not seem contribute to actually wising him up in any way.
Yeah I get that. I think its because the banned comment is sorta sarcastic so its generalizing the opinion of the thing which then with the ban just gets sorta wierd to read. It feels like the not not not of pinochio from shrek.
lemmy.world
Oldest