There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

lemmy.world

Dirk , to memes in But I love death
@Dirk@lemmy.ml avatar

So you love plants? Name all plats then!

Hazdaz , to lemmyshitpost in "It has to be Chromium"

What is the aversion to FF? It is memory hungry, but not that much different than Chrome.

lauha ,

To my knowledge the Chrome is the worse memory hog

Hazdaz ,

Worse than Chrome? By how much? I use both browsers on multiple devices on multiple OSes and neither of them are even remotely lightweight.

SaveComengs ,

chrome uses less base ram but more ram per tab i think

Hazdaz ,

I think it’s basically a wash. Anyone that says that one is particularly better or worse than the other is not being honest.

c0mbatbag3l ,
@c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world avatar

Chrome? Sure.

Vivaldi uses about half the RAM of FF when I have equivalent tabs open and running/idling.

Of course I have to have an ad blocker installed on FF whereas Vivaldi just does it natively, so that might be causing the difference in memory.

Here come all the anti chromium bois with "tHeReS nO wAy vivALdi bLoCkS aDs aS gOoD as u BlOcK oRiGin!‘’

To that I say… Have you ever fucking tried it? Lol I’ve tried both side by side, don’t argue unless you’ve actually done so as well. V’s ad blocking didn’t break when Manifest V3 dropped and until it stops being as good or better than UBO I’m just gonna keep using it. When that day happens, well like I said I’ve already got FF up and running anyways.

purahna ,
@purahna@lemmygrad.ml avatar

but Vivaldi is just chrome in a coat of paint??

HKayn ,
@HKayn@dormi.zone avatar

Is every Chromium browser just Chrome in a coat of paint to you?

glad_cat ,

For daily usage, and as long as you use uBlock Origin, Firefox has been perfect for me for the past 10 years. I don’t understand those who complain about it.

orphiebaby ,
@orphiebaby@lemmy.world avatar

A lot of fanboys are just gonna irrationally hate competitors. Star Wars vs. Star Trek and all that.

veganpizza69 ,
@veganpizza69@lemmy.world avatar

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/ae6f6c75-a1e4-41c6-a133-7de93e7ee302.png

All of them are memory hungry, the point is how dynamic they are in their “hunger” and “excretion”.

Hazdaz ,

Does the 34 and 20 represent the number of tabs? If so, this is not a fair comparison, what with FF having 50% more open. But even if that number doesn’t represent tabs, I am sure there can be websites that would put them much closer in performance.

Right now I have Chrome on my work machine. It has a 14 (again, not sure if those are active tabs or not) and it is eating 1.17 GB on my work machine. On my home FF (24) is eating 1.60 GB of RAM. FF is clearly using more RAM in each case, but it isn’t slowing my desktop down any more than Chrome is on my work machine. I’d like for it to improve, but rather use something other than Google’s tools on every single machine I use, I guess.

veganpizza69 ,
@veganpizza69@lemmy.world avatar

Does the 34 and 20 represent the number of tabs?

Yes, more or less. I think some other extensions can take up processes too.

I actually have enough RAM and I’m glad that the RAM is being used to load all the stuff instead of the pagefile. It’s my fault that I’m not closing stuff, not the browser’s for not guessing what I’m going to re-load.

If you ask people, I think they’ll just say that their main browser is like that. And that’ll apply to all of them, so it’s a user problem.

I remember these talks from a very long time ago. Very long time, when Opera had its own engine and before. I think the gaps have shrunk a lot, especially now that Internet Exploder is gone.

0Xero0 OP , (edited )
@0Xero0@lemmy.world avatar

I have 15 extensions running on my 8GB work laptop and there is little to no difference from my 16GB PC battle station at home. And I have like 4 more apps run alongside 10 tabs of FF at work, way more than what I would ever open at home

SternburgExport , to memes in But I love death

Who’s gonna fall for this ragebait?

dangblingus , to lemmyshitpost in "It has to be Chromium"

It doesn’t have to be Chromium, but asserting that Firefox is the only browser that respects your privacy is just untrue. Edit: I use FF and Brave for different browsing, as some websites just don’t like FF.

0Xero0 OP ,
@0Xero0@lemmy.world avatar

I’ve been using Firefox full-time since I switched to it 3 years ago and I haven’t seen a single website that doesn’t work with Firefox

shadowsrayn ,

I’ve found a couple, and the issue seems to stem from some type of cert from goDaddy specifically.

0Xero0 OP ,
@0Xero0@lemmy.world avatar

what are you talking about, I went to that site, clicked on everything, and nothing doesn’t load, everything works fine

shadowsrayn ,

I don’t specifically mean the goDaddy site, I mean some sites that have gotten there certs from goDaddy won’t work. It will give an ssl error. I believe it is their wildcard cert specifically.

elucubra , to memes in But I love death

I eat meat AND vegetables

Quills , to mildlyinteresting in This cream cheese cover looks like a smiley face
@Quills@sh.itjust.works avatar

Whoa, !pareidolia moment! Hehe

cley_faye , to lemmyshitpost in "It has to be Chromium"

I’ll keep avoiding firefox as long as they keep pushing weird decision with each update, the latest one being forcing “pocket recommendation” on the new tab page, even if the built-in (that is, you can’t remove it) pocket extension is disabled. Sure, I can go look for the new advanced parameter to disable every time, but why pull this shit in the first place.

lauha ,

What are those? I have never seen pocket recommendation.

dudewitbow ,

Cant you say that about chrome pushing weird decisions like manifest v3.

cley_faye ,

You can, but there’s a big difference : the average user (=the vast majority of people) will not see the difference. In some tech circles, or if you’re actively looking for it, you’ll know that it happens, and what it might (or might not) do, but 90% of people will not see a change. User interface remain the same, features remains the same, and extensions that could adapt will already have done so.

Firefox choices, for better or for worse, are very visible. The pocket extension was bundled in it, making it so that everyone have it show up one day. It being named after a (formerly) third-party service is not a good look. Then the new-tab page suggestions, which I can only see as an intrusive way to push content onto me (something I actively try to avoid, the samy way many “social network” keep pushing what their algorithms think is good for you). Add to that some decisions about actively ignoring user settings (and page content) about PDF handling, subsequently breaking tons of SPA because “they know better” (there was a long discussion, and the change was half-reverted once big enough sites showed issues).

The list could go on, ranging from “interesting” UI choices to bundling more and more advertisement for their own service, only to backpedal later with “oh, we didn’t think it would annoy people to do the exact thing you’re running from other browsers for”.

Chrome changes might be insidious, but they have limited impact to the actual users. Mozilla keeps changing Firefox in very glaring ways and not always with a sound reasons, user-wise. One could argue that these changes are all minor, but they do act as a deterrent for people that really can’t handle changes (remember, for most people changing the icon on a button is enough to make a feature “disappear” for them).

dudewitbow ,

I’d argue crippling what ublock origin is caple of doing is very crippling to the end user experience. Accepting a cippled ublock is similar to accepting the change when adblock plus white listed some ads.

cley_faye ,

Again, factor in the number of people knowingly using ublock, and actively looking into what changed vs. what still works fine for now. Manifest v3 have no reach beyond techies, and as such is “accepted” by default. Remember that most people are totally fine with these changes because the larger picture is not shown to them.

swancheez , to memes in But I love death

Sorry, was I supposed to eat them while they are alive?

EatsTheCheeseRind , to memes in But I love death

What three animals everyone else eating? We’ve got chickens, ducks, pigeons, quail, geese, cranes, turkeys, cows, deer, elk, moose, antelope, armadillo, beaver, bobcats, coyotes, foxes, lynx, bear, bison, caribou, goat, musk ox, pronghorn, sheep, muskrat, opossums, pigs, porcupine, rabbits, squirrels, pheasant, chukars, and tons of tasty insects to choose from.

SaltyIceteaMaker ,

Tell me with a straight face that you eat a fucking squirrel

dream_weasel ,

THAT’S the one you take issue with? Lol

In not sure anyone is eating muskrat or opossum outside West Virginia mountain hermits, people born before 1890, and anyone who self identifies as a trapper.

EatsTheCheeseRind ,

Squirrel are fantastic.

They’re the least “gamey” out of most small game, less so than rabbit, and taste something like leaner dark meat chicken.

Awesome in a crockpot substituted for chicken in most recipes. Can fancy up squirrel with a Sous vide to make squirrel confit bánh mì tacos, or keep it old school and make squirrel pot pie.

redballooon , to mildlyinfuriating in You can't uninstall this software without being forced to participate in their survey

Just check one of the other bullets.

joe ,

even better, write the ‘never gonna give you up’ lyrics. be as useless as possible

Paws , to cat in Glitch in hiding

Great name for a black cat. Matrix reference, right?

I’m sure she thinks she’s totally invisible in that picture 😄

BestBouclettes OP ,

The name comes from Wreck it Ralph, it’s Vaneloppe’s surname. Yeah, she often thinks that she is an apex predator. But bringing her outside definitely shows the opposite 😁

Paws ,

😄 I see! I was thinking of the black cat in The Matrix which they see walk by them twice, indicating a glitch in the Matrix. Great name anyway! 😁

ModdedPhones , to mildlyinfuriating in You can't uninstall this software without being forced to participate in their survey

For you Windows users. Check out chocolatey.org kind of like apt-get for Windows without stuff like this

NettoHikari , to mildlyinfuriating in You can't uninstall this software without being forced to participate in their survey
@NettoHikari@social.fossware.space avatar

lol. uses operating system with built-in firewall installs crapware 3rd party firewall

SpicyPeaSoup , to noncredibledefense in You like kissing HIMARS don't you
@SpicyPeaSoup@kbin.social avatar

Yes, and you can't stop me.

Blackmist , to memes in Stop he's already dead

User expandable/replaceable storage, please.

There’s no reason whatsoever that a 2TB iPad should cost £1250 more than a 128GB one. I put an extra 2TB in my PS5 the other week for under £100.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines