There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

engadget.com

MehBlah , to technology in Apple refuses to call Apple Intelligence 'AI'

Of course not. They didn’t think of it but they name their shit so it abbreviates to it. What a bunch of pretentious assholes.

ArtVandelay , to technology in Apple refuses to call Apple Intelligence 'AI'
@ArtVandelay@lemmy.world avatar

They’re trying to make people associate the term “AI” with its long form spelled out, which is obviously Apple Intelligence. The goal would eventually be that when people throw out the term AI, it’s assumed that they mean apple intelligence.

cmgvd3lw ,

Great point!

Quicky , (edited )

This is exactly why, and as simple as it is, it’s brilliant passive marketing. It stealthily implants an association to Apple Intelligence into every product and article that mentions AI, and might even require the author to distinguish their meaning when they use the acronym. They’ve Sherlock’d AI.

pyre , to technology in Apple refuses to call Apple Intelligence 'AI'

couldn’t you at least choose a name with different initials?

themurphy ,

It’s the whole point. They’ll try to take over the AI brand by doing this.

"So what does AI actually stand for? "

“It stands for Apple Intelligence, of course!”

“Wow, Apple really is everywhere, they are so good and competent.”

This will happen too often.

pyre ,

yeah but then it doesn’t make sense to refuse to call it AI.

themurphy ,

It does, because now it’s their own thing.

So instead of having what everyone else is having, they have their own and also hijack theirs, because Apple put the company name in it.

Chadus_Maximus ,

The worst part about this is us calling it “Apple intelligence” ironically will make idiots believe that to be correct.

Akasazh ,
@Akasazh@feddit.nl avatar

iIntelligence?

uebquauntbez , to technology in Apple refuses to call Apple Intelligence 'AI'

… or BI for better Intelligence, CI for common intelligence … YI for yummy intelligence, ZI for zoomers intelligence …

0oWow , to technology in Apple refuses to call Apple Intelligence 'AI'

It’s ok. Everyone else will do it for them.

praise_idleness , to technology in Apple refuses to call Apple Intelligence 'AI'

Reminds me of this gem www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulqRsqD0R64

Kolanaki , to technology in Apple refuses to call Apple Intelligence 'AI'
@Kolanaki@yiffit.net avatar

They just want to Think Different.

Unfortunately that often means being stupid.

mp3 , to technology in Apple refuses to call Apple Intelligence 'AI'
@mp3@lemmy.ca avatar

It’s because it’s not artificial, it’s organic.

jabathekek , to technology in Apple refuses to call Apple Intelligence 'AI'
@jabathekek@sopuli.xyz avatar
lurch , to technology in Apple refuses to call Apple Intelligence 'AI'

Here you go Apple: 🍏I

mannycalavera , to technology in Apple refuses to call Apple Intelligence 'AI'
@mannycalavera@feddit.uk avatar

Too late

Ultraviolet , to technology in Humane is said to be seeking a $1 billion buyout after only 10,000 orders of its terrible AI Pin

I’m sure there’s some MBA douche stupid enough to buy it.

Semi_Hemi_Demigod ,
@Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world avatar

I could see Apple buying it. The form factor makes sense, it’s the fact that it relies on AI and has its own cell connection are the main issues. If I could tap it and have Siri take dictation or take a picture of something to get more information it would be pretty neat.

efstajas ,

Does it though? Having it pull down your shirt, having to rely on projecting a GUI on your hand, and being unable to hear it in loud environments all seem like pretty strong limitations of the form factor

Semi_Hemi_Demigod ,
@Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world avatar

I’d drop the projector interface, as cool as it is, since you have a phone for that. Maybe make it a pendant as well as a pin.

Apple’s got a lot of experience with using tiny speakers in loud places, so I bet they could figure out something maybe using directional microphones. Plus, again, you’ve got the phone so you can use the headphones.

farcaller ,

If you drop the projector, then airpods already do it better when paired with the watch. There’s no point in such a device at all, then.

Semi_Hemi_Demigod ,
@Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world avatar

Airpods don’t have a camera though. 90% of my photos are of things I need to remember, like a shopping list or a specific product I need to get Having to dig out (or find) my phone to do that is a pain.

And I don’t have Airpods because I’d lose them, one by one, and the replacements are twice the price as another pair of perfectly workable Bluetooth headphones.

efstajas ,

If they wanted to companies could put a camera in a smart watch easily. Samsung was doing it ages ago.

sugar_in_your_tea ,

My kids have a crappy watch ($30-40) that has a camera. It’s not a technical problem, it’s just a stupid idea, it’s not an ergonomic place to use a camera.

stonehopper ,

Bruh i’d worried about the privacy of your kids when wearing crappy cheap device with a camera on it

sugar_in_your_tea ,

Why? There’s no internet connection on it, so the only way to get media on or off is via the micro SD card.

efstajas ,

For sure, my point is just that they could if it made sense — so clearly they don’t think it does, at least for now.

Semi_Hemi_Demigod ,
@Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world avatar

Which would be great if I wore a watch, but I don’t

Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In ,

What about the Meta Ray bands?

Semi_Hemi_Demigod ,
@Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world avatar

The time before I lose a pair of glasses is inversely proportional to how much I pay for them. If I spent $400 on glasses they would likely disappear off my face before I left the store

Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In ,

Sunglasses are very easy to lose.

I’m considering a prescription pair because those are less likely to be lost.

I just wish they weren’t meta linked.

dependencyinjection ,

Apple already have the perfect form factor, it’s called a phone.

GamingChairModel ,

Or, if you want something smaller, they have a watch.

Hobbes_Dent ,

Or if you want something bigger they have glasses.

Semi_Hemi_Demigod ,
@Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world avatar

What if I don’t wear a watch?

irreticent ,
@irreticent@lemmy.world avatar

Then you’ll have to look elsewhere when you want to know what time it is.

jol ,

Why on earth would apple buy this shitty android device? And feature wise, they can just make the airpods into an AI device paired with your phone or watch.

capital ,

I don’t need any hardware that does something my phone already does.

I don’t understand this reverse consolidation these companies think people want.

jeffw OP , to technology in After its reputation went up in flames, Humane warns users its charging case may too
@jeffw@lemmy.world avatar

Gotta say, this is “headline of the year” contender material

finley ,

Only if it weren’t for the sloppy verb tense disagreement. It should read:

After its reputation goes up in flames, Humane warns users its charging case may, too

5th graders learn how to conjugate irregular verbs. Engadget editors should know better.

Cheradenine ,

Isn’t it past imperfect though? So it would be goed

finley , (edited )

“Goes” and “may” are both present participle, whereas “went” is simple past participle. To match “went”, one would have to use the word “might” (simple past participle of “may”). The choice of the word “might”, however, is inappropriate in this context because it is referring to something that would happen in the future (and is less than certain to), and the word “might” typically refers to things that could have happened in the past. “May” refers to things that are likely to happen in the present or future, making it the appropriate word choice.

Also, there is no imperfect tense in English. That would be the continuous tense.

catastrophicblues ,

Can you help me understand why? Both seem right to me, and GPT is insistent that the original is right

finley , (edited )

“Goes” and “may” are both present participle, whereas “went” is simple past participle. To match “went”, one would have to use the word “might” (simple past participle of “may”). The choice of the word “might”, however, is inappropriate in this context because the headline is referring to something that would happen in the future (and is less than certain to), and the word “might” typically refers to things that could have happened in the past. “May” refers to things that are likely to happen in the present or future, making it the appropriate word choice.

Edit: the verb tenses should match because the first clause is a dependent clause which depends on the second clause which defines the subject “Humane”. If the first clause had been an independent clause, then it would be OK for the verb tenses not to match. Bad style, but not grammatically incorrect.

catastrophicblues ,

Thank you so much! That makes sense, and since you explained why, I can look up participles myself :)

Snapz , to technology in Humane is said to be seeking a $1 billion buyout after only 10,000 orders of its terrible AI Pin

How do you actually get the oil from the snake though?

Skymt ,

Turn them into bovine fodder, then get the oil from the bullshit.

Reverendender , to technology in Humane is said to be seeking a $1 billion buyout after only 10,000 orders of its terrible AI Pin

I am also seeking a $1 billion buy out, to compensate for years of being underpaid! What a coincidence!

mPony ,

I’d buy you out but all I have is my 20 bucks from streaming music revenue and I’m going to spend that on beer.

downhomechunk ,
@downhomechunk@midwest.social avatar

A 6 pack of good beer or a 30 pack of piss?

mPony ,

oh jesus, GOOD beer.
how anyone can drink sub-par beer is fucking beyond me. Drinking that stuff is just self-disrespect. I mean, I get it, but, just, no.

downhomechunk ,
@downhomechunk@midwest.social avatar

I can confidently say as a recovering alcoholic that I would have bought neither. I would gave gone with a handle of the cheapest vodka in the store and a pouch of drum, bugler or Samson. And that would have been my 3 meals for the day.

mPony ,

well bud, I must admit that does sound a bit rough. I wish you well in your recovery.

bizzle ,
@bizzle@lemmy.world avatar

If you even made one dollar off your own music, that’s fuckin cool. You earned that beer!

What’s your band called?

mPony ,

we’re called The Three Leonards. We do covers of pop songs in a pastiche of mid-1980’s Leonard Cohen, and yes it’s pretty different than music other people make today. Folks seem to like our covers of Toxic and Rusted From The Rain quite a bit.

And yeah, we friggin’ earned that beer.

bizzle ,
@bizzle@lemmy.world avatar

You guys rock surprisingly hard

mPony ,

a) Thank you :) That’s super nice to see, first thing in the morning.
b) Please tell your friends
c) Which ones do you like best?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines