There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

boingboing.net

YoBuckStopsHere , to news in Almost all major advertisers have fled Elon Musk's Twitter, new data shows | Boing Boing
@YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world avatar

After the killed tweetdeck I haven’t been back.

bus_go_fast , to news in Almost all major advertisers have fled Elon Musk's Twitter, new data shows | Boing Boing

Not Apple, though.

darmabum , to news in Almost all major advertisers have fled Elon Musk's Twitter, new data shows | Boing Boing

I enjoyed how the author used the name “Xitter” (and how it may be pronounced), instead of the tedious “formerly known as” moniker.

spider ,

“Xitter”

At this point, “Shitter” would be more appropriate.

ikidd ,
@ikidd@lemmy.world avatar

But that’s the beauty, most english speakers would pronounce the X as “sh” anyway. It’s perfect.

rbhfd ,

Can you please eshplain why they pronounce it that way?

Deebster ,
@Deebster@programming.dev avatar

Yeah, I don’t think so either - we have English words starting with X and they’re most Z sounds: xenon, xylem, Xerox.

I think if you know a little Mandarin you might pronounce it that way, but surely that’s a small minority.

girlfreddy OP ,

I liked it too. Makes more sense than continuing the explanation 18 months after the fact.

PupBiru ,
@PupBiru@kbin.social avatar

tedious is the point! i love that by trying to make it quick and “catchy” he made it really long, cumbersome, and made it a meme that the rebranding will never work because we’re still referring to it as twitter but worse

moonwalker , to news in Almost all major advertisers have fled Elon Musk's Twitter, new data shows | Boing Boing

I see a bunch of ads from big companies on Twitter still. Wonder how accurate this actually is?

emeralddawn45 ,

Well it says that many companies are spending extremely low amounts, like $10 on ads. So I assume musk has just been giving away ad space to try to keep those accounts open for as long as possible.

iegod , to news in Almost all major advertisers have fled Elon Musk's Twitter, new data shows | Boing Boing

Puzzles us? Motherfuckers how are you this stupid. Am I on crazy pills? How is society so fucking stupid?

Hackerman_uwu ,

Actually a really clever way to call them liars without drawing heat from lawyers.

How are you this stupid son?

Gazumi , to news in Almost all major advertisers have fled Elon Musk's Twitter, new data shows | Boing Boing

Musk fanboys will be saying “Wait fir it, his superbrain plan hasn’t become obvious just yet”. I say he’s the idiot that he appears to be.

dangblingus , to news in Almost all major advertisers have fled Elon Musk's Twitter, new data shows | Boing Boing

Working as intended then.

Saudi Arabia is loving the new twitter!

Hawk , to news in Almost all major advertisers have fled Elon Musk's Twitter, new data shows | Boing Boing

Musk is fully expecting to build a US version of WeChat and for everyone to flood back in.

Can’t wait to see this plan fail even more.

dipshit ,

Guys what if… guuyyyss… what if… what if we made all the apps in your phone into one app and used it to spy on you all the time and to control your life after we push out all the other app developers. guys! it’s just competition! Free marketplace of ideas. Besides, how else could we setup our own social credit system?! guyyyysss?!

cley_faye ,

Imagine trying to do something that only have a change to work if pushed by the authorities, while also shitting on said authorities.

His genius knows no bound.

SocialMediaRefugee , to nottheonion in Wall Street Journal complains about workers using their sick days

With working from home being so well established now a sick day frequently means you are still working, just from home.

Piecemakers3Dprints , to news in Why diamonds suck
@Piecemakers3Dprints@lemmy.world avatar

Wait, wait! Lemme guess. “Exploitation of child labor, unsafe (ie. lethal) practices, and general corruption”, right?

JustZ ,
@JustZ@lemmy.world avatar

Yeah but also cut hardness shine fire brilliance etc etc. moissonite is objectively superior in every way.

This site is about two very simple truths: (1) diamonds are an incredible rip-off, and (2) a little known naturally-occuring gemstone called moissanite is superior to diamonds in every essential way: cut, color, clarity, durability, fire, brilliance, and cost.

surewhynotlem ,

When I proposed to my wife, I gave her the choice. Sure could have a diamond, or she could have a moissonite (which is sparklier) and we could pay off her car loan. She made the right choice.

crandlecan ,

She married someone richer? 😂

surewhynotlem ,

Shit. Where’d I put my burn cream…

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

The engagement ring I gave to my wife had natural diamonds, but it belonged to my great-grandmother, so I felt it was ethical enough. I certainly wouldn’t have bought a new one that wasn’t synthetic.

surewhynotlem ,

Re-use beats new every time

LavaPlanet ,

You forgot about the whole, hoard heaps and pretend they’re rare and we don’t have swimming pools worth in warehouses.

JustZ , to news in Why diamonds suck
@JustZ@lemmy.world avatar

All my homies hate diamonds.

TranscendentalEmpire , to news in Why diamonds suck

While I agree we shouldn’t be using them for jewelry, diamonds are factually very important and incredibly valuable to manufacturing.

They’re the only thing hard enough to cut and shape tungsten carbide, which is instrumental in basically any complex machinery work.

Emma_Gold_Man ,

Interestingly, moissanite (per the source referenced by the article) exceed diamonds in hardness (“toughness”) as well.

TranscendentalEmpire ,

I saw that as well, but I think cut hardness must be jewelers terminology. As far as actual hardness diamonds are a 10 on the mohs scale, moissanite is a 9.25, and tungsten carbide is usually around 9-9.5.

nutsack ,

the ones in tools are man made and they’re a lot cheaper to buy

TranscendentalEmpire ,

Depends on the tooling you’re going for. Synthetic diamonds are great for creating abrasives, which makes up the majority of industrial diamond tools.

But for a lot of machining where you need a large cutting head, industrial diamonds are a little too small. I think most synthetic diamonds are less than a millimeter in diameter. They can be made larger, but they take a long time and aren’t very cost effective.

The vast majority of diamonds mined are industrial grade, especially the larger ones. So you end up using a bit of both depending on your application.

SnotFlickerman , to news in Why diamonds suck

About this site…

© 2006 Josh Kaufman. Content last updated: May 21, 2006

I mean, this is still all true, but damn. Why is boingboing reporting on a nearly 20-year-old site in response to news about the diamond industry? One could argue the existence of that site and people’s knowledge of all that being true is part of why diamond sales were in the crapper anyway…

boingboing has really gone downhill since most of the original team left and it became an ad-infested mess.

Ejh3k , to news in Why diamonds suck

I’ve been getting podcast ads lately for “natural diamonds” which is badmouthing man made diamonds and a it give a couple very true facts about how 80% of the diamond’s value stays in the community and it’s all legal and above board and definitely no one dies for these diamonds.

Damaskox , to news in Why diamonds suck
@Damaskox@kbin.social avatar

I've heard that diamonds brought to the surface from the depths below change with time cos they don't experience the pressure anymore.

interceder270 ,

I heard that you won’t be able to tell the difference because you’re not a jeweler.

Personally, I think it’s good people value ‘natural’ diamonds more so they can get ripped off by being sold synthetic diamonds and told they’re natural.

They won’t be able to tell the difference, and they have enough money to fund their stupidity.

Damaskox ,
@Damaskox@kbin.social avatar

I have a feeling that you're implying negative critique on me.
Just telling what I heard, mate. I don't know is it a fact or not. I don't use or buy diamonds and I don't know much about them.

Cheating people is not cool.
One thing you could do would be to get the diamond checked to find out its authenticity.

interceder270 ,

Cheating rich idiots is definitely cool.

They only got rich by cheating others, so it’s all fair.

Damaskox ,
@Damaskox@kbin.social avatar

They only got rich by cheating others, so it’s all fair.

While that may be the case in many situations, I doubt it is in every existing case.

interceder270 ,

Or they inherited it from someone who took advantage of others, correct.

I guess you can make an argument for restitution.

ubermeisters ,
@ubermeisters@lemmy.world avatar

“Rules for thee but not for me” works both ways you know. Attempting to justify your shitty actions to get ahead is just declaring your selfishness. You should be rich, you’re already in the mindset.

interceder270 ,

I bet you watch ads on videos.

ubermeisters ,
@ubermeisters@lemmy.world avatar

Cool, good for you

interceder270 ,

Lol, got’em.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines