There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

RustyShackleford

@[email protected]

I can neither confirm, nor deny that I am in fact D̵̡̮̻̗̖̮͔̜͈̙͖͙͍̺̀̒̍̌̑͐̓͡å̴̲͍̋̉́̀̑͊̎̐̊͡l̴̟̭̳̄̅̕͝͠͝ȩ̸͚̼̘̫̺̻̬̻̮͖̣̬̖̠̗̎̌ ̵̯͕͛́͋͌̀͝͠ͅͅG̷̛͈̩̟̟̠͓̗̘͓͍̽̒̌̔̓̈͗̐̈̿͠͠r̷̘̞̹͂̀̑̋̀͌̍͗̆͝͠͝ͅi̶̡͔͖͍̟̲̮͑̎͌̀̎b̵̡̢̹̗͔̗͍̘̣͊͊̑͒̍̑͌̽͋͌̔͝͝b̷̭̩̩̣͙̺͎̱̗͙͚̩̈́l̸̛͎̼̟̋͆͆͗̓̓̓͘͟ĺ̶̼͇͎̫̮͎̣̳͉̯̊̆̂̓̄̍̃̚e̶̢̡̛̫̣͈̺̾̅͐̾̓͒̚ͅ.̴̫̞̥̒̈̇̓́̾͗̒́̉̔͑

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

RustyShackleford , (edited )
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

Your opinions don’t constitute reality.

People like to remember him as being snti-slavery. He wasn’t. He was trying to work both sides, and it happened to benefit him to end slavery.

Lincoln frequently expressed his moral opposition to slavery in public and private. “I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong,” he stated. “I can not remember when I did not so think, and feel.”

This Wikipedia article has many direct quotes from him about his thoughts on the morality of slavery.

You’re lying about his positions to fit your complaint.

The right thing to do would be to allow Ukraine to use our best weapons, and strike deep within russia. But that doesn’t benefit America to end the war. Instead, it benefits America to drain russia for generations of all military, vehicles, equipment, and ability to recover. It benefits America to send a message to China to not fuck around.

While those are all ancillary benefits to NATO and their allies, a massive reason to not give Ukraine longer ranged weapons is to not catastrophically destabilize the country with the largest nuclear weapon stockpile on Earth. Furthermore, the United States has been giving Ukraine more “deep-strike” capable weapons systems very recently, since the Ukrainian invasion of the Kursk oblast.

There are plenty more reasons to withhold “carte blanche” access to more modern weapons platforms, but it’s irrelevant to what’s wrong with what you typed.

The way you frame things is what pisses me off about politics the most.

A few simple Google searches and some light reading prove your assertions as “examples” to your point wrong, but you spout drivel like this like it’s obvious. And then nuance, detail, understanding, veracity, etc. are further trampled by your obviously uneducated fan-fiction(s) because it makes you feel good to virtue-signal on the internet.

RustyShackleford ,
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

And they’re ashamed that he types up crap like what he posted.

RustyShackleford ,
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

Start saying no. If you don’t know how, start learning. It’s hurting everyone up and down the industry.

I am almost purely focussed on creating DNNs (“deep neural networks” for the unaware) and it’s almost always a nightmare work-wise, even without all the rest of the other crap.

RustyShackleford ,
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

Especially after age 40 and a knee surgery… I’m tired boss! 😩

RustyShackleford , (edited )
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

That’s actually a core tenant tenet of conservative ideology

It’s basically social Darwinism; it benefits him if people believe that rich and successful people are better and thereby should be rewarded with more power.

RustyShackleford ,
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

Hello, Dale! I see that you are a man of culture as well.

RustyShackleford ,
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

I’ve always wanted to say this!

Username checks out.

RustyShackleford , (edited )
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

Rascist Racists are like that.

RustyShackleford ,
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

I wonder if Game Science meant avoid politics like “western identity politics” or “critique of the CCP”? Perhaps both?

MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell tears into his own network for airing Trump press conference without fact-check (www.mediaite.com)

MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell tore into the major cable news networks, including MSNBC, on Thursday after they aired former President Donald Trump’s press conference live and didn’t “fact-check every lie” he told....

RustyShackleford ,
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

The board. Usually composed of the largest shareholders.

RustyShackleford ,
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

They have always been the bitch-made invertebrate snowflakes they love to complain about. It’s always projection with these mouth-breathers.

RustyShackleford ,
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

Man cannot remake himself without suffering, for he is both the marble and the sculptor.

- Alexis Carrel

RustyShackleford ,
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

Kama-blah, as in, “blah, blah, blah,” perhaps?

RustyShackleford , (edited )
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

Your rights end where my rights begin, and conversely, my rights end where yours begin.

RustyShackleford ,
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

But then you’ll finally get some exercise and do something about your sat-in bean bag chair physique. /s

RustyShackleford ,
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

Is it supposed to read as “training and resources”? That comma is confusing.

RustyShackleford , (edited )
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition: there must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

- Francis M. Frank Wilhoit

RustyShackleford ,
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

Noted and adjusted.

RustyShackleford ,
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

One (or many) can be opposed to a platform or ideology while simultaneously advocating for a different platform or ideology.

RustyShackleford ,
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

Getthefuckouttamyfacewiththisridiculousbullshit.

RustyShackleford ,
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

quit while there they’re ahead

RustyShackleford ,
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

This problem is a problem of the Democratic Parties Party’s own making.

RustyShackleford ,
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

In my opinion, the US federal government can/should be able take over Boeing temporarily in cases of felony or federal offenses perpetrated by executive personnel for the duration of the criminal investigation and trial.

RustyShackleford ,
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

There’s just too much potential for graft grift.

RustyShackleford , (edited )
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

they could have kept literally everything else the same

The literal sense of what you’re saying is implied since it’s not a figure of speech or hyperbole.

RustyShackleford ,
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

College dropout and late registration are far superior.

RustyShackleford , (edited )
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

You can just say you don’t care. The “literally” isn’t necessary.

RustyShackleford ,
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

I wonder if there’s an inverse relationship between an institution’s size versus its competency.

RustyShackleford ,
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

This is so cool!

When I catch a few moments of spare time from work and family obligations, I might fork this and integrate it with streamlink-twitch-gui.

Streamlink Twitch GUI has a feature to automatically open a web browser with the selected stream’s chat feed. I think an easy mod would be to replace the “open chat in browser” functionality with your terminal feed.

RustyShackleford ,
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

On a side note, you need more beets and less Schnapps.

RustyShackleford ,
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

I suppose in Dutch, it would be “een holocaustje”.

RustyShackleford ,
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

I imagine that our (U.S.) government’s case resides primarily on the premise that the state may exercise the ability to force divestment of a company with foreign ownership.

These powers are granted by the National Defense Authorization Act which seeks to prevent imminent national and private security vulnerabilities being exploited by foreign adversaries and agents; the actors here would be specifically the CCP and their intelligence and military apparatus’ shell companies and PMCs.

The precedents set by U.S. Anti-Trust laws support their position, but the primary argument in the state’s defense are the powers granted by the NDAA.

I’m only speculating.

RustyShackleford ,
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

Conversely, a matriarchy doesn’t automatically imply a more moral and meritocratic society.

Women are just people and subject to the same human flaws as men are, especially in matters of resources, power, and influence.

RustyShackleford , (edited )
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

Your are assailed by many threats: the religious, the nihilists, the corporatists, the fascists, and the alleged “collectivists”. Extreme authoritarian “leftists”, A.K.A. “tankies” (i.e., apologists for Lenin, Stalin, Mao, the CCP, the DPRK, Fidel Castro, Che Guevara, Xi Jingping, etc.), are threats to a free, egalitarian, and open society, are just as violently authoritarian as their religious, corporatist, and fascist competitors, and should be treated with the contempt, distrust, and ridicule they deserve.

They claim to speak and fight for the proletariat, promising a new utopia, never before seen, once their revolution executes the last “class-traitor”. In practice, once they’re finished with “seizing the means of production”, they’ll never relinquish control and become the new ruling class.

They’ll assume the mantle of an enlightened elite post-revolutionary administration to guide the proletariat to their promised utopia of “each according to their ability, to each according to their need”. In practice, "the party leadership needs the most, because they’re obviously the most able” in reorganizing the economic and political structure of society. The utopia of the “dictatorship of the proletariat” will never exist, only the dictatorship of the “revolutionary party”. Repression and execution await those who question their claims and decisions.

These supposed champions of labor are really harbingers of death - of the mind and the body. They claim to be the true authoritative “voice of the people”. Understand what they really are; power over everything and everyone, forever, is what they seek. They want you either as a true believer (a willing pawn) or dead, just like all of the other supposedly benevolent dictators who promised utopias throughout history.

They’re akin to the pigs in Orwell’s Animal Farm, the loudest voices in the revolution, usurpers of a righteous cause, but a bit “more equal” than everyone else after the farmer is done away with. Fortunately, the pigs, like the farmer, got their comeuppance in the end of the story. Make these pigs squeal.

RustyShackleford , (edited )
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

The CCP, the RNC, and the DNC are not your friends.

Vote your conscience. Always remember to see who’s funding who, who will gain, and who will lose. There are better choices than others, even when confronted by only bad choices.

RustyShackleford , (edited )
@RustyShackleford@programming.dev avatar

I will repeat this until the heat-death of the universe:

Personal liberty and self-determination are assailed by many threats: the theocrats, nihilists, corporatists, fascists, and so-called “collectivists”. They all claim to be the true authoritative “voice of the people”.

Extreme authoritarian “leftists”, A.K.A. “tankies” (i.e., apologists for Lenin, Stalin, Mao, the CCP, the DPRK, Fidel Castro, Che Guevara, Xi Jingping, etc.), are threats to a free, egalitarian, and open society, are just as violently authoritarian as their religious, corporatist, and fascist competitors, and should be treated with the contempt, distrust, and ridicule they deserve.

They claim to speak and fight for the proletariat, promising a new utopia, never before seen, once their revolution executes the last “class-traitor”. In practice, once they’re finished with “seizing the means of production”, they’ll never relinquish control and become the new ruling class. Beware of their cults. Understand what they really are; power over everything and everyone, forever, is what they seek. They want you either as a true believer (a willing pawn) or dead, just like all of the other supposedly benevolent dictators who promised utopias throughout history.

They’ll assume the mantle of an enlightened elite post-revolutionary administration to guide the proletariat to their promised utopia of “each according to their ability, to each according to their need”. In practice, "the party leadership needs the most, because they’re obviously the most able” in reorganizing the economic and political structure of society. The utopia of the “dictatorship of the proletariat” will never exist, only the dictatorship of the “revolutionary party”. Repression and execution await those who question their claims and decisions. These supposed champions of labor are really harbingers of death - of the mind and the body politic.

They’re akin to the pigs in Orwell’s Animal Farm, the loudest voices in the revolution, usurpers of a righteous cause, but a bit “more equal” than everyone else after the farmer is done away with. Fortunately, the pigs, like the farmer, got their comeuppance in the end of the story.

Make these pigs squeal.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines