There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

uberdroog ,
@uberdroog@lemmy.world avatar

Meanwhile, in an affluent suburb of Pittsburgh, two companies are pulling new fiber, where there is already a provider and fiber lines. Why? Because of this. No one chooses Comcast unless they are the only game.

ShepherdPie ,

I’m surprised they’re allowed to do with with Comcast being headquartered in Philly.

ayyy ,

A lot of giant corporations don’t shit where they eat. They treat the locals well so that they continue to get favorable legislation passed.

tal ,
@tal@lemmy.today avatar

Despite that, ISPs claim that prices for the low-cost option should be calculated based on “the economic realities of deploying and operating networks in the highest cost, hardest-to-reach areas.”

Frankly, in the hardest-to-reach areas, I’m not sure that it makes sense to subsidize terrestrial ISPs at all. Hard-to-reach rural areas are Starlink’s bread-and-butter.

Infynis ,
@Infynis@midwest.social avatar

Musk is already a problem for national security, if we’re going to use Starlink even more, the government needs to just seize the company

ayyy ,

I can’t imagine tying my only communications with the outside world to the whims of an unhinged lunatic who has proven that he’s willing to ruin good things just because he feels like it that day.

jawa21 ,
@jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

The upfront cost for Starlink is insane for most people, especially those in rural areas.

Nighed ,
@Nighed@feddit.uk avatar

It’s way less than the cost of running a fiber line out there though!

So potentially subsidise the starling terminal instead.

Sanctus ,
@Sanctus@lemmy.world avatar

Kill your ISPs. They are more trouble than they are worth.

db2 ,

In the early 2000s iirc they were given billions to build out rural broadband. They kept it. Rural broadband still doesn’t exist to speak of.

SirDerpy , (edited )

We did the same for urban fiber. It’s never materialized, either. And, the USDA has been providing funding and loans for rural broadband for quite awhile.

db2 ,

It’s almost like the foxes are running the hen house, as the old saying goes.

SirDerpy ,

Hamilton built the framework. It’s been foxes since John Adams.

sunzu ,

American taxpayer is always paying for major CapEx for most industries then turn around and price gouge us.

Most amercians see to be fine with it since they live in a free market economy where private sector funds investment.

SirDerpy ,

free market economy where private sector funds investment

If that’s how it actually worked we might accept it. But, today there’s little distinction between public and private: Corporations own our government.

tal ,
@tal@lemmy.today avatar

I don’t think that the United States Department of Agriculture is involved in subsidizing urban fiber.

SirDerpy ,

Yeah. That’s wasn’t very clear. The USDA has been funding and providing loans for rural broadband. About $1b, IIRC.

Thanks for the pointing that out.

reddig33 ,

I’ve read there’s lots of “dark” fiber in cities, but I don’t know if it’s true. I do know that AT&T has a fiber line that runs through my neighborhood, yet I can’t get fiber internet. Really stupid.

Lost_My_Mind ,

“Whats this?”

“Thats the fiber line.”

“Oh, cool. Can I get fiber?”

“No.”

“Why not?”

“We’d need some federal grants to run some fiber first.”

“But the fiber is right here.”

“We need that for other people to get fiber.”

“Well, why can’t I access it too?”

“Ugh! I told you! We need public money to our multibillion dollar company to use this fiber line thats already here!”

“I don’t understand…”

“You wouldn’t.”

SirDerpy ,

I do know that AT&T has a fiber line that runs through my neighborhood, yet I can’t get fiber internet

The local exchange carriers (LECs) typically change from plain olds telephone system (POTS) to fiber at the neighborhood level. Coax carriers also.

Fiber to the neighborhood is already there. It’s not hard to run a line across a neighborhood to connect whatever on either side.

The difficult part is getting from a neighborhood connection to each individual home. It’s a flower pot install on each property, all connected together underground, and it can’t fuck with gas, water, sewer, etc.

reddig33 ,

Seems like they could connect something wireless to the fiber to provide internet to the home.

SirDerpy ,

The entire cellular network, particularly T-Mo 5G unlimited, would put it to shame. If one wants better then Starlink.

The way to do wireless would be to form a neighborhood ISP, put up a tower, then wireless P2P to each home. I’ve seen it in a few places. More common is citywide wifi.

PriorityMotif ,
@PriorityMotif@lemmy.world avatar

That’s called a WISP

jubilationtcornpone , (edited )

AT&T has a copper wire connected to my house but they refuse to offer me any service at all because they “dOnT oFfEr DsL aNyMoRe.” Shitty DSL is shitty DSL but it’s better than nothing. At least I have access to Cable but I know plenty of people who don’t. That shit should be illegal.

amanda ,
@amanda@aggregatet.org avatar

I have the same situation almost. We have fiber from Telia delivered to the basement of our apartment building where it’s converted to cable by Tele2, who rents access to Telia’s fiber. Neither of them were willing to sell me or the organisation that owns the building access to fiber, even though it would have required only activating an outlet on whatever fiber switch thing they have in the basement.

Tele2 also has a monopoly on internet access; it’s that or 4G/5G.

This led to the absurd situation where we have a special coax outlet, followed by a cable modem right next to the fiber switch to supply the intercom system with very very expensive and terribly slow internet.

seaQueue ,
@seaQueue@lemmy.world avatar

Yup, they took the 90s era broadband grants and just pocketed them because they knew that the Bush era FCC wouldn’t pursue the matter.

ShepherdPie ,

These bills have been passed multiple times over the last couple decades and the result is always the same. In places like NY, they claimed to have run fiber to millions of homes but they never actually connected it to any of these homes, it just runs along under the street out in front of them, therefore they can claim these homes are “covered by fiber.”

db2 ,

And the fuckers want ten grand from the homeowner to jack it in. The drop won’t even be owned by the homeowner afterward either. It’s literally criminal.

Assman ,
@Assman@sh.itjust.works avatar

Idk who built it but the place I used to live in BFE definitely has broadband now.

BallsandBayonets ,

Because of the FCC’s hilariously out of date definition, many places have theoretical broadband access (one 10mb pipe shared amongst dozens of households).

SupraMario ,

Almost a trillion dollars. It was like 980 billion…yea…

Facebones ,

To boot, Thats happened like at least 3 times now. Lmao

Itdidnttrickledown ,

And in the late 2000’s. And again a few years later. And as of last year they, the FCC is once again throwing money at them without any real oversight. I worked for a ISP in 2010 and we couldn’t get any of the money because a bank had first lean on the company USDA demanded that before any money could be approved. AT&T got money for our area and their footprint shrank the next year when they cut off dial-up customers in the area.

SeaJ OP ,

We need to stop giving money to ISPs. Give the money to municipalities so they can offer municipal broadband.

neoman4426 , (edited )

Can confirm, my ISP is fiber out in a rural area, run by the rural electric company from a couple counties over and it's pretty decent. Not top of the line stuff, offers either 100 megabit or 1 gigabit symmetrical for a home plan, but it's much better than the fixed point wireless that was the best previous option and maxed out at 100 down/20 up for the highest tier plan, and that was only if you could get clear line of sight to the transmitter (Would sometimes go down if it was raining hard or it was windy or something as something could block line of sight or misalign the transmitter/receiver on one end of the connection or the other)

wreckedcarzz ,
@wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world avatar

not top of the line

1 gig symmetrical

Mf I’m over here with 100/10 dsl in a suburban market, and you’re like ‘meh could be better’ to what I am like ‘I would literally kill for that’

A competing company offers faster speeds but last time I checked, it was around $300 a month for better speeds while retaining ‘small business’ service (to sidestep data caps). My isp has gig fiber… 4 miles away… and isn’t expanding it. Kill me.

Glitterbomb ,

I cant say enough great things about these rural electric companys rolling out their own fiber. I had an interesting opportunity a while back to do contracted field work for a bunch of small midwest/gulf state electric companies, and was absolutely blown away by the work they’re doing.

The first one I worked, I was extremely confused by the communications on all of their poles thinking ATT came through and delivered the nicest fiber id ever seen to cows and corn until I came across the linemen casually splicing fiber on the back bumper of their bucket truck. ATT was copper only in the area, even in the small town they werent even trying - the electric company was dominating.

The whole mood was wild really, most of these companies were co-ops that were tied into the community already, and its really the community that decided the co-op should do internet too. I never got to be an actual customer of any of these, so i never got to know what it feels like to tell ATT to kick rocks and then actually be able to do something about it. But every single customer and employee was feeling it and it wasnt hard to get them grinning about it.

The options available to them were also something to behold. Its their poles. Communications always go under power, and normal communications companies kinda sorta just work with what they get after the electric company uses all the space they need. These guys can rearrange their electric lines to make way for communications all in the same day. ATT would probably get bogged down under 8 months of red tape if they tried to do that.

One of these co-ops would even use space on their poles for directional wifi antennas. Some rural houses would have a half mile driveway, and the power line has long since been buried, so they just beam internet wirelessly from fiber on the main road and skip the expensive buildout to lay fiber for one person. I got to chatting with one guy that had this setup. His house was downhill from the road, so right next to his house they ended up installing the absolute tallest wooden utility pole i have ever seen, i dont even remember the footage, but all that was on it was a single 10 inch wifi dish at the very top. He still got a few hundred both ways, those directional antennas were impressive, and they just power them off their own electric grid.

It really was a daily eye opener of how it could be if these shit ISPs didnt control everything. I strongly encourage everyone to look up to see if youre served by one! You might be surprised, they sometimes whittle in close to some larger cities, if you live in some newer neighborhoods on the outskirts…but man look at me ramble

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •