There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

KingThrillgore ,
@KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml avatar

I used to really like MKB but he’s really become the black Gruber at this point

danielfgom ,
@danielfgom@lemmy.world avatar

Instead of using robots to replace menial jobs and help humans who have physical labour jobs, they’ve invented a tool that will get rid of all white collar jobs, forcing us all into manual, low paid labour jobs.

Taxes will fall off a cliff and life will get really bad because the state won’t have money to maintain the country. Companies making Ai content won’t be able to sell it because no one can has money to buy it. In general all product sales will fall off a cliff, except for food, and many companies will close, resulting in mass unemployment and eventually collapse of society …

Great job morons!

realharo ,

If AI gets really good, manual labor automation won’t be far behind, as the AI itself will be applied to robotics and AI research.

The only thing of value left will be natural resources.

butterflyattack ,

Happily my job is so shit and poorly paid that I don’t anticipate it ever being worth automating. Sometimes humans are just cheaper.

danielfgom ,
@danielfgom@lemmy.world avatar

Sounds like good motivation for the machines to kill us off and keep the resources for themselves

realharo ,

That’s assuming they have that goal. The goal of survival and reproduction exists because of natural selection (those that don’t have that goal simply don’t make it into the next generation, when competing against those that do).

But that doesn’t necessarily apply to AI systems. At least while humans have a say in which systems survive and get developed further, and which ones get scrapped. When humans control the resources, the best way to get a sizable allocation of them is by being useful to humans (or at least making them believe that).

TwilightVulpine ,

More like, a motivation for the wealthy who control the machines to kill us off.

AI sentience is still science fiction but AI-powered corporate exploitation is very real, right now.

Toneswirly ,

dont worry Bro, they’re gonna replace the low paid jobs too.

GiddyGap ,

Came here to doom-scroll. I was not disappointed.

willington ,

There’s always money/wealth in the economy. If the workers don’t have it, someone else does. Find where the money is, and tax it. Then redistribute.

It’s not a hard concept. It’s a question of the political will. We know what to do, but will we do it?

gapbetweenus ,

forcing us all into manual, low paid labour jobs.

Maybe we should have shown some solidarity with people in those jobs and fought for them to get paid better?

werefreeatlast ,

Now I can be in the Simpsons! Everyone in my front yard security camera can be in the Simpsons 😀!

KairuByte ,
@KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

“Sir, I understand you’re trying to be helpful, but I assure you the background characters from the symptoms did not rob you.”

UraniumBlazer ,

I’m really excited for this. This way, converting my favourite webtoons to full blown animations won’t be that difficult (in the sense that it won’t cost millions of dollars). Really exciting times!

coolmojo ,

Have a look at Blender it is free and open source software which enables you to create 3d animations. You can find tutorials on the Internet.

lolcatnip ,

That requires vastly more work to produce any results at all, to the point that most animation people might want to produce never gets made because the process is far too expensive. Mediocre animation that gets made using AI tools is better then high-quality animation that never gets made at all.

Blender and AI tools both have their place but they’re not interchangeable. And just wait until Blender starts incorporating AI, which it will, because the purpose of something like Blender is to use computers to automate most of the work that would need to be done with previous generations of tools, and AI is just an extension of that. Animation will exist on a continuum from fully handmade artwork to fully machine generated artwork. Unless you think everything should be drawn by hand one frame at a time, you should be happy about everyone being able to produce animation in a way that suits their skill level and the amount of time they have available.

Emerald ,

Consistency is still an issue. It’s hard to generate multiple images or videos and have a consistent visual style with ai

UraniumBlazer ,

Not necessarily. Fine-tuning models can solve this issue to a great degree. The model’s behavior is largely dependent on its training data. If it has generic training data, it’s going to produce generic images.

See Corridor crew’s anime experiment. They managed to solve this issue to a great degree in their second version. It’s quite cool!

Potatos_are_not_friends ,

Can we get a tldr? Can’t watch a video.

squirrel OP ,
@squirrel@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

I’ve asked Gemini for a summary and it’s pretty spot on:

This video is about AI generated videos and how they have become very realistic.

The speaker, Marques Brownlee, discusses a new AI model called Sora that can generate videos from text input. He shows examples of videos generated by Sora, including one of a woman walking down a Tokyo street, a car driving up a mountain road, and a litter of puppies playing in the snow. He points out that these videos are still not perfect, but they are much better than what was possible just a year ago.

He discusses the implications of this technology, both good and bad. On the one hand, it could be used to create fake videos that could be used to deceive people. On the other hand, it could be used to create stock footage that is more affordable and accessible than ever before. Brownlee concludes by saying that this technology is still in its early stages, but it has the potential to change the world in many ways.

demonsword ,
@demonsword@lemmy.world avatar

I’ve asked Gemini for a summary

man you’ve post the video and couldn’t even summarize it yourself? talk about laziness huh

CaffeinatedMoth ,

Let’s see. Spend several minutes composing a few paragraphs, followed by revising because of errors in composition, spelling,or grammar…or simply spend a few seconds with AI. Work smarter not harder.

berg ,

This isn’t work.

GoodEye8 ,

It is. It’s just that 99% of the work has been automated away.

lolcatnip ,

Let’s see your summary of the article, then. I can’t help but notice you haven’t included one in your comment.

(Apologies if you were being tongue in cheek.)

Potatos_are_not_friends ,

That’s amazing. I didn’t know AI can do that. Going to start doing that from now on!

abhibeckert ,

TLDR: a year ago AI video was garbage. Today it’s almost as good as one that would cost a few hundred thousand dollars to pay a human production team to make (according to someone who’s professional work is creating those videos).

It’s not quite there - hands glitch out occasionally. Sometimes animation doesn’t quite line up right (e.g. walking might skip a step) but it’s 99% there and and the improvements over the last 12 months are astounding. That last 1% surely won’t take long to close.

There was a landscape drone video from a helicopter that looked absolutely real.

Note this is not publicly available yet - OpenAI said they are still working on safety features to reduce the risk of it being used to create content that they want no part in.

KingThrillgore ,
@KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml avatar

I hate this.

Reverendender ,

When do we get to use this? I don’t know what a “Red Team Member” is, but I pay a monthly membership.

kinsnik ,

Red Team is a hacking term that refers to people who try to sabotage or use the system to create harmful content, as a way to test and discover problems before it is usable by any external users.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_team

PlexSheep ,
@PlexSheep@feddit.de avatar

That’s inaccurate. Red Team is the guys that test your security from an attacker view point. Red Teams are often contractors hired by companies. The companies are the ones paying to be “hacked”, so they can fix whatever gaping security holes the red Team finds.

At least, that’s usually the definition. If just talking about AI stuff, I’d call those people testers.

Lightdm ,

I always thought that people hired to pen test are white hat hackers? What is the difference to red team?

theherk ,

While white hats are sometimes paid, it is generally in bounties. It just means being adversarial without trying to be unethical. So, find the hole but tell the person that made it rather than the crooks that will exploit it.

A red team on the other hand is a known value. They are the bad guys in a simulation. The military exercises similarly or any organization that wants to test defenses. Red team == the make believe bad guys.

PlexSheep ,
@PlexSheep@feddit.de avatar

People in red Teams are white hats. The terms describe different things. The “color wheel” is operational and thinks in the context of an organization. Red Team tries to attack our stuff, blue team tries to defend our stuff, yellow team builds our stuff etc.

White hat is just a term for ethical hackers, black hat is a term for criminals. Grey hat means someone in-between (think political hacker defacing website of organization they don’t like), there is also some more but the shades of grey are most important.

Varyk ,

Okay so who has the updated Will Smith’s spaghetti video?

aniki ,

My jaw is on the floor. It makes typing very difficult.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • [email protected]
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •