There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

programmerhumor

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Snapz , in premium stand
@Snapz@beehaw.org avatar

If you pour any non-Apple proprietary liquids into the mug (i.e. poor people liquids), the cup turns green to signal to bystanders that you’re less worthy of love.

dullbananas , in Personally I prefer `throw new nullpointerexception`
epyon22 ,

This is my favorite. I did php early in my career and for years I would have to Google “<lang> equivalent explode/implode” because it was so memorable

lowleveldata , in Personally I prefer `throw new nullpointerexception`

I have never used System.exit() or sys.exit(). What is a use case where you would call these explicitly?

epyon22 ,

Applications where you aren’t using some sort of framework. Usually MVC or other frameworks would handle this or are designed to continuously run.

Grishaix , in Personally I prefer `throw new nullpointerexception`
@Grishaix@feddit.de avatar

MS Developers: Kill all children

ndguardian ,

Well I didn’t wake up today expecting to watch a video about task manager, but here I am.

yaniv , in Personally I prefer `throw new nullpointerexception`
@yaniv@lemmy.ml avatar

I love die()! but PHP has exit(), too, and it does the same thing

dsdsds13 , in Just API calls to GPT

But our proompts are highly prooprietary

Hexarei ,
@Hexarei@programming.dev avatar

Because we hired the best proompt engineers money could buy

Edgeburn02 , in Just API calls to GPT

OpenAI should really do something about the apps that are just ChatGPT clones with a subscription on it

Hexarei ,
@Hexarei@programming.dev avatar

I mean. They’re paying OpenAI for API access to run those clones so OpenAI isn’t complaining lol

bitsplease ,

Why on earth would they “do something” about them? Companies doing that is literally OpenAIs business model lol

They only gave the public direct access to chatGPT to drum up excitement for it, the monthly subscriptions from people using chatGPT+ are nothing compared to the API fees from big companies

Knecht , in Just API calls to GPT

Every damn time. At work I got in contact with several “AI startups” and only after directly asking if they’re just relying on Open AI they finally admitted that they are.
You could really tell they where trying to keep things vague before that.

Liempong_pagong , in premium stand
@Liempong_pagong@beehaw.org avatar

Theres a hole in the bottom. The plug is also $999

nave , in Just API calls to GPT
@nave@lemmy.fmhy.ml avatar

That’s why my startup uses GPT-4!

SavvyWolf , in Copyleft is the only way.

I will say, as I’ve grown older and more jaded, I’ve been finding the GPL more and more appealing…

Edit: Oh wow, why did a year old post show up at the top of “Hot”, sorry about bumping.

christophski , in premium stand

Well yeah obviously apple aren’t the first to come out with a hot water receptacle with an ergonomic handle, but they just do it better don’t they? I’ll be in the queue at midnight waiting for mine

remram , in It's older than a lot of new developers at this point.
@remram@lemmy.ml avatar

For whatever reason, to this day I get a 403 error on http://google.com/ from IPv6. https://www.google.com/ works through.

Sometimes it’s not your side that is broken.

SteveTech ,

http://google.com/ works fine for me, tested in Firefox and with curl -6. So it could actually be your side that is broken, although it is probably your ISP’s.

remram ,
@remram@lemmy.ml avatar

My side works fine, Google just doesn’t like the address. It’s a tunnelbroker address, maybe they consider that bots… but only for some of their servers? It’s weird

SteveTech ,

Oh okay, IMO IPv6 tunnels are worse than just disabling it, because it’s basically just a proxy with IPv6, and since there’s no encryption (at this layer) both your ISP and now the tunnel could collect your data, as well as added latency.

But I guess it’s okay for experimentation or if you actually require IPv6 for something.

remram ,
@remram@lemmy.ml avatar

Hard disagree there. It is a tunnel, it is plenty fast if the intermediate node is close enough, and why would you want encryption at the IP layer.

It works great and gives me IPv6 that I otherwise wouldn’t have with my ISP (Optimum), allowing me to connect to native IPv6 site and use all the IPv6 functionality I want (dedicated IPs for containers/VMs etc).

SteveTech ,

Yeah those are some good points, I guess I’m just spoilt with native IPv6.

darkfiremp3 ,

ipv6.google.com is a thing! If it works for you, you have working ipv6, if it doesn’t, you don’t!

remram ,
@remram@lemmy.ml avatar

I have IPv6, Google just doesn’t like my address.

Port8080 , in I lied

Core Dumped

KMohZaid , in I hope you all have a great day.
@KMohZaid@lemmy.ca avatar

Yo 😂 github with gitlab logo

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • [email protected]
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines