There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

programmer_humor

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

CanadaPlus , in They tried

I’m pretty sure breaking your website with no cookies is against the rules, actually. It’s either serve the EU with GDPR-compliance or GTFO entirely.

Yeah, you could still just break the law, but as usual there’s a cost to that one way or the other.

peter ,
@peter@feddit.uk avatar

Tons of companies break the cookie law already, but enforcement seems to be rare

PersnickityPenguin ,

What’s the cookie law?

Pixel ,

No cookies before dinner.

peter ,
@peter@feddit.uk avatar

The cookie consent banner has to allow you to opt out of cookies as easily as accepting them

gamey ,
@gamey@feddit.rocks avatar

Almoat true, it actually has to be a opt in system, opt out is illegal already!

peter ,
@peter@feddit.uk avatar

Yeah, I think it has to default to off but I believe the banner they show shouldn’t make it harder to continue with it being off rather than turning it on

Honytawk ,

If websites want to track you through cookies, they have to ask for permission.

akulium ,

Doesn’t enforcement work by letting competitors sue you if you don’t follow the rules for these things?

CanadaPlus ,

I’ve heard stories about some of the big guys getting hit with sizable GDPR fines. I don’t really know the full extent of what they do but I do imagine there’s someone that makes it their job to prosecute GDPR violations.

Vuraniute ,
@Vuraniute@thelemmy.club avatar

this. and honestly I wish more websites followed the “serve under gdpr or don’t have a European marker”. A random blog once wasn’t available in the EU because of GDPR. And you know what? It’s better than them violating GDPR and the EU doing nothing.

jabjoe ,
@jabjoe@feddit.uk avatar

It’s more about the big boys. If they act in a way that breaks the GDPR, now the EU has a stick to hit them with.

MrBusinessMan , in They tried

Shrewd businessmen: 1

tyrannical big government: 0

HawlSera , in They tried

I feel like people would have responded to this meme better if you didn’t depict the European Union as an NPC

RobertOwnageJunior ,

Especially compared to some scummy corps.

MDFL OP ,

They’re the ones who made the law. Who else should have been in the meme?

stevedidWHAT ,
@stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world avatar

The businesses who are actually doing this shit and not the people actually trying to solve issues in the world lmfao.

Honytawk ,

People complaining about the cookie law don’t understand the issue.

The law doesn’t state that websites have to show a cookie banner. It states that if a website wants to track you with cookies, they have to ask permission.

You can get websites (like lemmy and wikipedia) that don’t ask for cookies, because none of them try to track you.

So if a websites demands cookies or they don’t allow access, it is a clear sign that the website only cares about your visit if they can invade your privacy for profit.

Meaning it will just be a dumb clickbait website with no decent content anyway, that you should just skip.

RagingNerdoholic , in They tried

Road to hell, good intentions and all that. Government fundamentally misunderstanding the role of cookies and the fact that browsers can handle user privacy with trivial effort by default rather than having every single website annoy the fuck out of you with a million goddamn notifications before actually showing you what you want to see.

kornel ,

The annoying popups are an act of malicious compliance from data harvesting companies. The tracking industry wants people to associate the right to privacy with stupid annoyance, so that people will stop demanding privacy.

The legislation does not say anything about cookies. It’s about rights and responsibilities in data collection (no matter how it’s done technically). The “consent” part of it exists as a compromise, because there has been heavy lobbying against the legislation.

This is not a technical problem — we’ve had many technologies for it, and the industry has sabotaged all of them. There was the P3P spec in 2002! It has been implemented in IE that had 90%+ market share back then. And Google has been actively exploiting a loophole in IE’s implementation to bypass it and have unlimited tracking. Google has paid fines for actively subverting Safari’s early anti-tracking measures. Then browsers tried DNT spec as the simplest possible opt-out, and even that has been totally rejected by the data harvesting industry. There are easy technical solutions, but there are also literally trillions of dollars at stake, and ad companies will viciously sabotage all of it.

stevedidWHAT ,
@stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world avatar

Well said, appreciate the write up ☺️

Somewhereunknown7351 , in Thought I would share my success
@Somewhereunknown7351@kbin.social avatar

New problem arises

PseudoSpock , in Thought I would share my success
@PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Congrats on the … success? Sorry, I was headed in a different direction there for a sec.

fkn OP ,

I was headed in the wrong direction for weeks

RIP_Cheems , in Thought I would share my success
@RIP_Cheems@lemmy.world avatar

God releases the update which makes the solution invalid:

damnthefilibuster , in Which side are you? Javascript or Typescript

Fuck typescript.

Konlanx ,

(30,27): error TS7006: Parameter ‘fuck’ implicitly has an ‘any’ type.

Pfnic ,

<span style="color:#323232;">Error: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'fuck')
</span>
DeriHunter , in They tried

Serious question: I know that there are tracking cookies and the user should be able to decline those,but most sites have an auth cookie that stores you’re credentials. The devs can store it in a different place like local storage but thats really unsecured.what can the devs do in this situation when the user decline all cookies?

Phen ,

The eu rules are mostly about unnecessary cookies. Most web devs just copied whatever everyone else was doing and now there’s this standard of having to accept cookies but the EU doesn’t really enforce it like that

dzire187 ,

it’s not up to the EU to enforce it.

heeplr ,

not sure why you’re downvoted. of course member states enforce it.

KevinNoodle ,

Usually the prompts are specifically for tracking cookies, not essential ones for login. Alternatives without cookies:

  • URL sessions
  • Tokens
  • OAuth/OIDC third party
  • Local/Session Storage (ditto - mind the risks)
GuroGuru ,

The EU is not stupid. They categorized cookies into the necessary ones for site-usage and those that aren’t. So developers just categorize their session cookie (rightfully) as necessary and that’s it.

fosforus ,

Cookies that are crucial for the functioning of the website cannot be disabled by the user.

sip , (edited )

well, they can be disabled by the user and the site simply won’t work.

shasta ,

He means they are exempt from the EU law that says the use must be presented with the option to disable it

nothacking ,

The GDPR is not “cookie law”, it only prohibits tracking users in a way not essential to the operation of the site using locally stored identifiers (cookies, local storage, indexed DB…)

Storing a cookie to track login sessions, or color scheme preference does not require asking the user or allowing them to decline.

smileyhead ,

What the dev can do if user decline processing of personal data is not store such personal data in cookies or anywhere.

Or even better, do not track the user so the consent would only be needed in for example registration form.

lobut , in Which side are you? Javascript or Typescript

I dunno, Typescript can be nice at times but it always feels like I’m bolting on something that doesn’t belong on top.

I’ll still use it for now. Not sure JSDoc is as adequate for an enterprise app for me. I know Svelte and stuff do, but I’ll wait and see.

StorageAware , in Which side are you? Javascript or Typescript

All the stuff I write is personal tools anyways so I do the same. They’re small anyways.

Blamemeta , in Which side are you? Javascript or Typescript

Typescript is great for catching long standing bugs in old legacy JS.

surge_1 , in Which side are you? Javascript or Typescript

Just use Kotlin to write your JS/TS

harry315 ,

the fuck? TIL

Cocoa6790 ,
@Cocoa6790@kbin.social avatar

Best place to learn it?

surge_1 ,

Kotlin Koans is a good hands on intro, especially if you’re already familiar with Java.

surge_1 ,
Solemarc ,

You can also do this with dart. I swear there was another “new” language which could also be compiled to JS as well.

thebosz ,

There are a lot of programming languages that compile down to JavaScript. I used to be big into Dart, but lost interest when they became solely focused on Flutter.

I personally like using Haxe as it compiles to actual readable JavaScript (and, for fun, a bunch of other languages).

qaz ,

Scala can also compile to JS.

milkjug , in Thought I would share my success
@milkjug@lemmy.world avatar

On StackOverflow: “never mind, figured it out.”

fkn OP ,

Hey, I marked only one jira with “Works as intended” for only one of the big reports related to it, thank you very much.

Fried_out_Kombi , in Which side are you? Javascript or Typescript
@Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world avatar
onlinepersona ,

Web development needs a whole lot of change and these kinds of fights are meaningless indeed.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines