There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

programmer_humor

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

ramble81 , in Repeat after me "this problem isn't bothering me". There! fixed it

I tend to lean towards neutral good it seems

electric_nan , in Repeat after me "this problem isn't bothering me". There! fixed it

Sometimes I’m neutral good and other times chaotic good. I’m at a relatively small company though, so I’d probably be different at a megacorp.

BassTurd ,

I went from the sole IT person at a small/medium business for 9+ years to a new role at a big company with divisions and shit. In my previous position, depending on the day, I fell in every category, but usually chaotic good on good days. Now I’m pretty much neutral to lawful good. I’ll dabble in the neutral evil as I see fit, because PEBCAK and ID10t issues have no bounds.

Milk_Sheikh , in Repeat after me "this problem isn't bothering me". There! fixed it

Lawful neutral cuz in 6mo when some “controller” punches three buttons to run a report and asks “Hey why’d you do that?” THEN I’ll have documentation. And a job.

Make ticket, receive assistance. Fight me on that and I’ll add you to my email inbox’s ruleset - I am now an LLM, and will gentle-tone you to death via faux misunderstandings

unwillingsomnambulist ,

Yep, hard-line lawful neutral. Though I lean chaotic evil when someone high enough on the food chain starts complaining.

variants , in Repeat after me "this problem isn't bothering me". There! fixed it

But none of these are real, in the real world IT won’t touch your issue unless you create a ticket, then when you do they just never do anything about it anyway

BowtiesAreCool ,

In my experience I create a ticket, then after 3 days of not hearing anything they manually close it as resolved while having done nothing

IrateAnteater ,

I encountered “lawful evil” once. My answer of “I know what the problem is. I know how to fix it. But because you have no clue about what this company actually does to make money, you took away my ability to do it. So now I’m here, wasting both our time” didn’t seem to go over very well.

mosiacmango ,

Ehh. Depending on the industry and issue, thats wholley justified, not only from a “least privilege” sense, but from a regulatory one.

Step over into cybersecurity and you end up spending all day clamping down on usability because the company has legal requirements to meet to continue to exist. Many of the things we are compelled to do are overeager and overly pedantic, but it’s either “do it, pay up, or shut down.” The execs tend to prefer “do it” in my experience, which makes everyone’s day a bit more tiresome.

So its entirely possible that was out of their hands.

FuglyDuck ,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

Not to mention, how frequently the “I can fix it on my own” guy ends up making things worse.

Like my coworker who insisted he knew how to install a monitor and then couldn’t figure out why the display port wouldn’t work with a usb-a adapter. It had a normal DisplayPort plug and didn’t have a thunderbolt adapter (it’s a desktop.)

Rather than update the ticket that got him the monitor, he created a new ticket.

I can’t complain too much. IT guy likes me so he took the extra monitor and gave me a third one.

IrateAnteater ,

In this case, none of that applies. I do industrial programming. 99% of the ethernet networks I have to connect to don’t have a router, and nothing is running DHCP. They locked out my ability to manually change my IP address.

SatouKazuma ,

That shit is why I bailed on the cybersecurity industry completely, with no thought of ever returning. I’m an engineer (software aside, I also have an aero engineering background). I wanna build cool shit!

MehBlah , in Repeat after me "this problem isn't bothering me". There! fixed it

I thought I was neutral all my life but now I know I’m mostly evil.

palordrolap , in Repeat after me "this problem isn't bothering me". There! fixed it

Lawful good is asking for trouble. Before they know it, they'll be inundated with e-mails to their personal company address with poorly worded help requests. They'll spend half their time making and updating tickets on the user's behalf that would have been mostly automatic if they'd gone the Lawful Neutral route. They need to insist requests are sent to the main support address. I'm assuming that's tied directly to the ticketing system.

When I was being Lawful slightly-better-than-neutral, I'd create the ticket and then put a paragraph in the reply telling them to please not e-mail me directly in future, because one day I might be unavailable and their e-mail could go unseen for hours or even days.

Repeat offenders would eventually do it at a time when things were busy too, so I'd be concentrating on the tickets and not things to my personal address, so that slight delay often helped it sink in.

Ookami38 ,

Funny, for me repeat offenders somehow always had a second request I couldn’t find until 430pm on a Friday. Strange how it always happened. Oh well, sucks to suck.

tempest , in Happens all the time

I do enjoy the rust compiler error messages. They are nicely formatted

Shameless ,

I’m trying to learn rust and so far this has definitely made it so much more accessible.

Not to mention their super useful “rustlings” training which has these nice little challenges to get you used to language and syntax

30p87 ,

Yeah, but to observe such error messages you’ll basically need to wait for 20 mins for it to compile.

PlexSheep ,

No? The steps are compiled once and afterwards your project just gets compiled. Besides, rust-analyzer exists.

Gork , in Happens all the time

WRONG, PRIVATE!

Now drop and give me int(ceil(19.9))!

xlash123 , in Happens all the time
@xlash123@sh.itjust.works avatar

Lol, it took me a while to realize it’s the compiler essentially saying “how high”.

embed_me , in Happens all the time
@embed_me@programming.dev avatar

That’s what makes us humans different from computers. We don’t ask how high, we just do it. Now, if it were a C pointer it would jump anywhere from 0 to 2^32-1. That’s why C is more suited for artificial intelligence than it might initially seem. Thanks for coming to my tedx talk

crispy_kilt ,

Pointers are ackshully 48 bits on amd64 (which is most PCs and servers)

___qwertz___ ,

Well ackshully newer CPUs support 5-level-paging which uses 56 bits.

embed_me ,
@embed_me@programming.dev avatar

I was mostly joking about a stray pointer of type uint32_t*

So the size of the pointer itself doesn’t matter

trxxruraxvr , in Happens all the time

Height should be a float

ParanoiaComplex ,

I don’t know Rust but jump typically moves the program counter, where the height represents the number of instructions to move

trxxruraxvr ,

Afaik rust doesn’t have functions like that as they lead to unsafe code that’s impossible to check variable lifetimes for. I think OP created the jump function.

RustyNova ,

They created it. The compiler says the jump function is in src/main.rs

fossphi ,

Chad quantised rust

Klaymore OP ,
@Klaymore@sh.itjust.works avatar

It’s height in centimeters

SatouKazuma ,

But then wouldn’t it be fly(height: f64) instead of jump(height: i32)?

crispy_kilt ,

Never use floats.

bamfic , in Happens all the time

i dislike rust, but have to give them credit for helpful error messages. not quite racket level but impressive

crispy_kilt ,

What made you dislike it?

bamfic ,

the syntax.

qevlarr , in Repeat after me "this problem isn't bothering me". There! fixed it
@qevlarr@lemmy.world avatar
MystikIncarnate ,

Only if we like you.

TurboHarbinger , in Repeat after me "this problem isn't bothering me". There! fixed it

Chaotic good.

Completing a 10 mins ticket for something you end up fixing in seconds. Fucking chore.

MystikIncarnate ,

I fucking hate this.

Most days I spend more time accounting for my work than I do actually working.

Norgur , in much profits, just 5 people on team, imagine sweet sweet bonuses
@Norgur@fedia.io avatar

"but... I explicitly described this in the frickin' 'Business Case' you had me fill out a thousand times!"

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines