programmer_humor

subignition , 8 months ago in Oh yea, that's the good stuff **huffs glue**

Definitely looks unsafe to me.

henfredemars , 8 months ago in Implemented as requested

I don’t hate it. Seems functional.

idunnololz , 8 months ago

Is it tho? Those poles and numbers look flimsy.

remotelove , 8 months ago

It’s ok. They aren’t structural.

idunnololz , 8 months ago

They aren’t structural but they can easily fall over and cause structural damage.

huf , 8 months ago

i like it. it’d be a neat quirk.

xusontha , 8 months ago in The app doth protest too much, methinks

The server’s embrace, it turns cold,

An SSL error, its tale is told

Spaghetti_Hitchens , 8 months ago

The server balks, digital hands doth sunder,
Thine client's refused for its handshake blunder.

phorq , 8 months ago in Implemented as requested

That’ll really come in handy when they need to do renovations and lost the original blueprints.

over_clox , 8 months ago in The app doth protest too much, methinks

I believe this was from the original programming comments of Confucius…

mvirts , 8 months ago in Oh yea, that's the good stuff **huffs glue**

And yet still more better than writing a serious macro

rainynight65 , 8 months ago in Merge then review

I’m having a hard time figuring out whether this guy is a fucking moron or a fucking idiot.

enitoni , 8 months ago

Both?

vox , 8 months ago

pete’s a fucking genius

bier , 8 months ago

Exactly, this is how you pay off your mortgage

Skates , 8 months ago in Merge then review

That’s nice but it goes against our quality standards and the international quality standards we are charging the client extra for adhering to, the line you’re trying to merge into is stability and needs CCB approval for the merge, and the client has specifically requested only showstopper-level bugs be addressed for stability lines. You know what, I have neither the time nor the crayons to properly explain this to you, a consultant that supposedly knows the business. Pack your shit, you’re gonna have a wonderful time posting this crap on LinkedIn instead. #gitshiton

2 days before, at Pete Hurrd former job

AernaLingus , 8 months ago in The classic font size exploit

Full res (source)

The description:

Someone programming a website in HTML. But also a photo suitable for hackers. ;)

Devi , 8 months ago in Merge then review

This explains what is going on a facebook.

mateomaui , 8 months ago in Correcting > Helping

This is like putting a $10 price tag on a free sidewalk item so someone will steal it.

Manifish_Destiny , 8 months ago in Merge then review

‘i help JavaScript engineers become framework architects by getting them forcibly reassigned.’

VantaBrandon , 8 months ago in Merge then review

Better yet just edit files live on prod from Notepad (not plus plus) over Samba for “xtreme moral” boost

MeanEYE , 8 months ago

The amount of times where I had to fix things in live production servers is not a small number. Then again, we are only humans. Backup often and you are golden.

VantaBrandon , 8 months ago in Merge then review

I just commit directly to master with auto-deploy like a real cowboy, yee-haw!

floofloof , 8 months ago (edited 8 months ago)

Why review at all when the users will do this for you? Merge, deploy and move on. If it’s broken they’ll tell you.

I’m definitely going to start doing this at work. We don’t want our embedded firmware for medical devices to get stale.

VantaBrandon , 8 months ago

Right? Who needs a QA team when you can use real live customers for testing

floofloof , 8 months ago

It’s the Microsoft way.

DefinitelyNotAPhone , 8 months ago in Merge then review

Nothing improves morale like the on-call having to unfuck production for the third time that hour because mUh VeLoCiTy decided code review and testing in CI was too slow.

Techbros are fucking cultists.