There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

Chief justice Roberts pushed for quick immunity ruling in Trump’s favor – report

Chief justice reportedly took unusually active role in three recent supreme court decisions centering on Trump

John Roberts Jr used his position as the US supreme court’s chief justice to urge his colleagues to rule quickly – and in favor – of Donald Trump ahead of the decision that granted him and other presidents immunity for official acts, according to a New York Times investigation published on Sunday.

The new report provides details about what was happening behind the scenes in the country’s highest court during the three recent supreme court decisions centering on – and generally favoring – the Republican former president.

Based on leaked memos, documentation of the proceedings, and interviews with court insiders, the Times report suggests that Roberts – who was appointed to the supreme court during Republican George W Bush’s presidency – took an unusually active role in the three cases in question. And he wrote the majority opinions on all three.

AtomicHotSauce ,
@AtomicHotSauce@lemmy.world avatar

Awesome! Maybe we should do something about…

Oh yeah, we can’t.

Gingerlegs ,

Get out

ThePantser ,
@ThePantser@lemmy.world avatar

Seems like maybe we don’t pay these judges nearly enough if they can be bought so easily. Why don’t we just give them an unlimited spending account. Basically make them never want for anything so they can be immune to bribery. It’s a lifelong appointment to serve the country why should they be bound by a paycheck?

Valmond ,

Like elon musk is not bought out.

Do the inverse, elected for 5 or 7 years.

ThePantser ,
@ThePantser@lemmy.world avatar

He’s a fool and not a natural born citizen, also his brain is broken.

I feel we would win a fight to pay the justices more, more easily than it would to change their appointments.

Valmond ,

Pay them unlimited, yeah that wouldn’t attract the wrong people, like at all, no no not the slightest, only incorruptible well meaning people for sure.

thefartographer ,

And instead of paying them, pay 500 toddlers $2 each to kick them in the shins their entire career

wolfpack86 ,

Which makes them incapable of being bought? Look at any senator you care to.

Coach ,

Maybe we start with an enforceable code of conduct instead of…you know… a blank check?

FuglyDuck ,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

But, they’d choke on that!

In any case, I’m not sure Robert’s did this for a bribe. I think he might be a True Believer™️, maybe not in trump but in all the conservative bullshit trump enabo

Pieisawesome Bot ,

Sometimes bribery isn’t about the money, but the prestige.

ceenote , (edited )

Since the Roe v Wade verdict was leaked, I feel like the media has been glossing over the revelation that there’s just as much wheeling and dealing in the Supreme Court as in any of the other branches.

catloaf ,

It’s still just humans. Did you really expect otherwise?

ceenote ,

I think most people actually do.

LilB0kChoy ,

And they should.

FuglyDuck ,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

Most people aren’t exactly geniuses.

ceenote ,

Being above the fray is what the Supreme Court was intended to be, so you can’t fault people for initially assuming that.

FuglyDuck ,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

Remind me again….

How many years ago was the Supreme Court established?

What it was meant to be and what it has become aren’t the same. It was meant to be apolitical, sure, but anyone whose paying attention can see: its fucking political.

kescusay ,
@kescusay@lemmy.world avatar

“Small government!” cries the Republican party, while trying to grant the president unprecedented levels of power.

cornshark ,

In fairness, one single person seems like a pretty small government

EmpathicVagrant ,

That’s always been the meaning.

Jesusaurus ,

Though, he’s got small hands so what could he possibly do? /s

NOT_RICK ,
@NOT_RICK@lemmy.world avatar

I hate this unitary executive bullshit

anarchrist ,

Yeah but if you unify the government into one person, you could then technically drown that person in a bathtub, q.e.d. small government. Checkmate libruls!

catloaf ,

Seems people have certainly been trying.

anarchrist ,

Yeah latest guy seems like a “don’t tread on me” libertarian based purely on vibes, so that checks out

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines