There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

No Ban on Fracking: Kamala Harris Doubles Down on Fossil Fuels

In her first major interview since replacing Joe Biden on the ballot, Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris was questioned about her shifting statements on fracking, which has been linked to a surge in methane gas emissions over the past decade.

Harris, who has previously made comments opposing fracking, vowed not to ban it if elected. The vice president went on to highlight the Biden-Harris administration’s environmental record, which activists have criticized for vastly expanding oil production rather than drawing down the country’s reliance on fossil fuels.

“The data is telling us that what Kamala Harris said about fracking — that we can do it without dealing with reducing the supply of fossil fuels — it’s just not borne out by the numbers,” explains The Lever’s David Sirota, who adds, “Ultimately, consequences for that will be on the United States, for the entire world.”

reddig33 ,

Not banning something doesn’t sound like “doubling down”. Doubling down would be pushing for increases, or asking for tax incentives to encourage it. It’s more likely she knows it won’t be able to compete with renewables and will naturally die out without banning it.

finley ,

there’s also the possibility that, through further green initiatives and climate benchmarks, her administration can simply make fracking somehow prohibitively expensive or somehow impractical within certain performance restrictions without outright banning it.

brianary ,

On top of the likelihood that a ban would be very politically expensive, distracting, and watered down to pointlessness.

TransplantedSconie ,

A huge chunk of rural Pennsylvania is fracking jobs, and winning Pennsylvania involves making sure people stay employed.

Stupid motherfuckers want her to pull a Clinton and tell an entire section of the Pennsylvania working class, “tough titty go back to school” just before an election.

Keeponstalin OP ,

Or give them other job opportunities like in the renewable energy sector? They only want fracking because oil companies exploit those small towns to make them entirely dependent on the oil companies for employment

TransplantedSconie ,

Literally what Clinton said she was going to do. Do it AFTER the election. This is to fucking important because if he wins it’s game over on our democracy.

Keeponstalin OP , (edited )

No, she didn’t. She didn’t promise people from Pennsylvania anything to help their situation. She didn’t promise to bring jobs to those towns dependent on oil companies by shifting subsidizing to renewable energy companies in those towns. She needed to convince them that her policies would help improve their access to jobs and improve local development.

I’m not saying Harris needs to ban fracking, I’m saying it’s a much more effective message to promote more opportunities for those towns by improving the subsidizing of renewable energy companies, public and/or private. Their main concern is jobs, which can easily be addressed.

Llamajockey ,

Wtf is she doing killing her chances after a great start.

Antmz22 ,

What she’s doing is being a right winger. Idk why people are always so surprised when the right wingers they elect and support do right wing things.

samokosik ,
@samokosik@lemmy.world avatar

I think she made the correct decision. Banning fossil fuels is not realistic.

drdiddlybadger ,
@drdiddlybadger@pawb.social avatar

She’s learning from Hillary. You don’t tell people that you’ll end their jobs and then expect them to vote for you. More than a few states gave economies based on fossil fuels I’m not sure why people expected her to say she’s going to cut those off. We will expand green energy no matter what everything else is platitudes and pandering.

distantsounds ,

Ratchet effect continues

mkwt ,

Fracking means that the in United States is the chief petro state of the world, and can safely ignore OPEC.

This situation is going to continue in geopolitics at least into the 2040s regardless of what the policy on renewables is.

AA5B ,

All the way up we’re pumping is currently a huge part of our economy: we have to get off that addiction in fairly short order but can’t just wish it away, like it or not.

So it comes down to the details. I’d be satisfied if she started restricting longer term activities like exploration and building pipelines. That’s the climate change of the future that needs to be stopped now. It also makes clear to those businesses that they need to plan for a different path into their future

Antmz22 ,

So …

We have

  • drill baby drill
  • Build a Wall and secure the border!
  • do genocide
  • fund the police

And

  • fund the military to make it the “most lethal” in the world…

Trump V Trump sure is looking to be a fun one.

otter ,

Hello, fellow citizen, and welcome to the time-honored tradition of “Bread & Circuses”! 🥳 I can see you’re new here and having some difficulty with the minutiae of this season’s hottest event, and I’d like to offer some guidance:

It’s turtles all the way down. 😅💩🤷🏼‍♂️

Hold on tight, and keep your limbs inside the vehicle.

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/83651464-e957-4d15-8d63-78c9942fb97c.webp

givesomefucks ,

She cast the tie breaking vote to expand fracking leases as VP…

I don’t know why people thought she’d try to ban it as president, record breaking fossil fuels production under Biden is what’s propping up “the economy”

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines