There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

Etsy to ban sale of most sex toys, explicit content, and more

Online retailer Etsy will prohibit sales of most sex toys, content that depicts sex acts and genitalia, and more starting July 29.

The indie seller published its Adult Nudity and Sexual Content policy yesterday, which states that sales of adult toys that are insertable, “applied to the genitalia,” or “designed for genitals to be inserted into them” will be prohibited. That pretty much runs the gamut — dildos, vibrators, rings, plugs, and the like will be banned.

vk6flab ,
@vk6flab@lemmy.radio avatar

Based on the various draconian terms and conditions I’ve seen on my search for a solution I’d be surprised if this was driven by Etsy. In my opinion this is much more likely to be caused by its payment processor.

gnutrino ,

Yeah, this stinks of another company coming under pressure from Exodus Cry/Morality in Media lobbying of payment processors.

tal ,
@tal@lemmy.today avatar

Hmm. If the concern is the Etsy brand value, I’d just spin it off into a new company that does permit it. If you’ve already built a network of people selling and buying stuff and the software to do so, terminating it just sends the value of that to zero.

breadsmasher ,
@breadsmasher@lemmy.world avatar

Could be liability? Someone sells a poorly made toy which breaks inside someone. Is etsy concerned they maybe held liable for that sort of thing being allowed to be sold? I don’t know - thinking out loud

tal ,
@tal@lemmy.today avatar

Ehh. I mean, if they were just banning sex toys, I could believe something like that, but doesn’t explain why they’d ban stuff other than sex toys simultaneously:

Etsy is also banning nudity for human models, including “gluteal clefts and female nipples/areolas.” If you’re selling a sexy item of clothing, for example, you must censor body parts, use a mannequin, or opt for just photographing the clothing.

“Sexual language” concerning incest or “referencing familial relationships” will also be banned now. The examples Etsy lists are “Daddy’s slut” and “Choke me Mommy.” As of publication, these terms are still searchable on Etsy, and so is nude content. Searches for “porn” come up blank.

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

They do know that terms like “daddy’s slut” are not actually incest terms most of the time, right?

AnarchistArtificer ,

“gluteal clefts”.

I don’t know why I find that so funny.

greenskye ,

Even like ‘real’ dildo manufactures tend to claim the toy is for novelty use only and don’t recommend actually using the thing as an insertable object. Adult toys aren’t really regulated, because that would mean legitimizing them which is icky to the government. So they’ll never really be regulated for health and safety

tal ,
@tal@lemmy.today avatar
otp ,

Yeah, because it’s stupid to use them for that.

clinere.com

There are products that are designed to clean the ears. Q-tips are for makeup and cleaning electronics and stuff.

Sir_Kevin ,
@Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

I’m just going to have to disagree with you on that.

otp ,

If you can get your hands on them, try the clinear things. They’re shaped like cotton swabs, except instead of a wad of cotton on the end, it has a little scoop.

It’s like using a spoon to eat cereal instead of a hammer. I don’t understand why people use hammers.

Sir_Kevin ,
@Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Actually I do have something similar and it is indeed pretty great but q-tips are still in go to the daily use.

ChefWhite ,

So they’ve reinvented earspoons?

I bought one a few years ago for medieval reenactment stuff. Never planned to use it because I always hated the feeling of cotton buds. Then eventually got curious enough to try it.

Turns out it’s the texture I hate.

Rookwood ,

Companies don’t spin-off new competition. That would get everyone of the executives and the board fired. They kill competition. That’s why it’s mergers and acquisitions. Not spin-offs that meet the needs of consumers.

SaltySalamander ,

So confidently incorrect.

decivex ,

I think it’s most likely pressure from payment processors.

snooggums ,
@snooggums@midwest.social avatar

Payment processors shouldn’t be acting as a moral authority.

TheRealKuni ,

And yet, here we are.

grue ,

Yet again, failure to enforce antitrust law is a big part of the problem.

greenskye ,

The government has ceded the entirety of modern currency exchange to private companies, which is still crazy to me, but I honestly don’t see people even question it that often. As if it’s just a given that online purchases (the increasing majority of all economic activity) is subject purely to a ToS and not the laws and protections granted to us by the government.

treadful ,
@treadful@lemmy.zip avatar

As if it’s just a given that online purchases (the increasing majority of all economic activity) is subject purely to a ToS and not the laws and protections granted to us by the government.

What? Of course they’re still subject to laws. There’s so many laws and precedent based around banking that it requires specialized lawyers.

kent_eh ,

They shouldn’t be, but they have a long history of doing exactly that.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines