There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

news

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

FlyingSquid , in Scientists will unleash an army of crabs to help save Florida’s dying reef
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

This is how it begins.

TheBiscuitLout , in Doctors in England told not to start new patients on ADHD drugs due to shortage

Absolutely fucking brilliant. Not only is the waiting list for diagnosis four bloody years long, you won’t get any treatment at the other end of it. Just shoot me, dangling the carrot of help with no ability to provide it is worse than not offering it at all

AJB_l4u OP , in Explosion reported in Ankara, Turkey | Al Bawaba

WORLD NEWS Suicide bomber detonates a device in the Turkish capital. A second assailant is killed in a shootout apnews.com/…/turkey-ankara-explosion-dfdbae1c7cd9…

AJB_l4u OP , in Explosion reported in Ankara, Turkey | Al Bawaba

Suicide bomber detonates device in Turkish capital, wounding 2 police officers Second assailant is killed in a shootout; Interior Ministry says bomber attacked outside building housing general security directorate By AGENCIES Today, 11:37 am timesofisrael.com/suicide-bomber-detonates-device…

just_another_person , in Ahead of Presidential polls, Argentina parliament passes bill to abolish income taxes; know why

Can we get more info on this headline out the history for us non-Argentine folks?

AJB_l4u OP ,

Sept. 29, 2023, 3:24 AM Argentina to End Income Tax as Election Spending Spurs Inflation news.bloombergtax.com/…/argentina-to-end-income-t…

Congress approved a bill that formally eliminates income tax Massa advocated for bill as he increases spending before vote Argentina’s congress approved a bill that will eliminate income taxes for almost all formal workers, a measure poised to put more pressure on a ballooning fiscal deficit that’s underpinning 124% inflation before October’s presidential elections.

By a 38-27 vote, the Senate approved the legislation late Thursday advocated by Economy Minister and presidential candidate Sergio Massa, whose coalition placed third in the August primary vote. President Alberto Fernandez is expected to sign it into law. Argentines cast their ballots Oct. 22.

sickmartian ,

The important bit is this:

Massa is striving to regain lost electoral ground through substantial expenditure

Basically trying to hold on to power in any way possible. Primary elections were very unfavorable to the usual parties (the one currently in government and the one that was in power before and are acting more like a branch of the first one lately) and a guy that has some economic sense but also is a bit crazy a la trump for Argentina standards (you can find a lot of speeches and ramblings with him screaming, leans against abortion while spreading a freedom message, is pro gun carrying) is the one on the lead, so the other 2 parties are running a campaign on (a) throwing money at the population (below inflation interest loans, straight up grants, this “removal” of taxes, etc) and (b) scaring people (they go into peoples homes, colleges or train stations explaining how the guys that is on the lead is going to destroy everything, Big % of the TV news cycle is bashing on the guy on the lead).

This move is part of that.

Ah, one more piece of context, Massa is basically an acting president at this point with the low power the real president currently has plus the powers and support Massa has. This makes his “I’m going to make everything all right when I’m president” message a lot weaker than he intends to.

datelmd5sum , in Carbon monoxide blamed in death of homeless toddler in Syracuse

might be controversial, but I think toddlers shouldn’t be homeless.

sock ,

gah dam librul

jaschen ,

You’re so brave.

n00b001 ,

At birth babies should be working 5 jobs to pull themselves up by their bootstraps. No more handouts from mummy milkers! Bring back mandetory conscription for newborns! The market will provide, this toddler was homeless because the government is too large, and there is too much regulation!

SeaJ ,

If they want a home, they should get a job. Darn free loading toddlers.

maporita , in Fake GPS signals sent 20 aircraft off course in Iranian airspace - Times of India

GPS jamming is trivial. This is spoof which is a lot more complex and requires sophisticated kit. I imagine there is Russian involvement here.

REdOG ,
@REdOG@lemmy.world avatar

I mean they shot down their own plane last time jamming their own airspace is very probable IMO

sir_pronoun , in Carbon monoxide blamed in death of homeless toddler in Syracuse

Fuck, what a bleak headline

girlfreddy , in Carbon monoxide blamed in death of homeless toddler in Syracuse

District Attorney William Fitzpatrick blames the victims for the state and county’s failures.

He can go fuck himself.

The couple had recently been evicted from their home because of unpaid rent, Fitzpatrick said. He said while he didn’t blame the landlord for what happened, more could have been done to inform the family of housing services in the area. At the same time, county executive staff members had made arrangements for the family to stay in a hotel, he said.

“This could have been avoided,” Fitzpatrick said. “Housing is an issue in Onondaga County, but there were options available for them short of living in that car.”

huginn ,

Victim blaming, so got right now.

there were options available for them short of living in that car.

Yeah buddy? State them out loud. What are the options? No hand waving: what is the place to go for a homeless toddler to have a safe experience?

Cause I can only think of 1: home.

drolex ,

Well the toddler could have taken a job at the asbestos mines instead of slacking?

Burn_The_Right , in Scientists will unleash an army of crabs to help save Florida’s dying reef

In unrelated news, FL conservatives pass law banning crabs due to “water wokeness”.

Burn_The_Right , in The Supreme Court will take up abortion and gun cases in its new term while ethics concerns swirl

This illegitimate court needs to be aborted.

LrdThndr ,

213th trimester abortions?

Eonandahalf , in Brain-eating cannibal back in public life after 10 years

How do you casually ask to eat your therapist? 🙃

Algaroth ,

Mind if I eat you real quick by the way?

spittingimage ,
@spittingimage@lemmy.world avatar

“You know… you don’t have to attend that lunchtime meeting with your boss…”

fosho , in Every single Onewheel is being recalled after four deaths

many interesting conversations here and looks like a lot of folks who ride these often without issue.

I’m a motorized skateboarder for well over 15 years now. I’ve ridden one wheels a few times and while they are intuitive and versatile they are also the most dangerous option in an already very dangerous category. it’s anecdotal, but all the worst injuries I’ve directly and indirectly confirmed were all from riding one wheels. I have lived on the edge and done plenty of dangerous things but owning a one wheel will never be one of them. the number of times I’ve had to be very nimble very quick would not have been possible on a one wheel. they simply lack the quick stability required to safely jump off from either foot and run out in any direction.

all that to say I’m not surprised that they have done some version of a recall and I’m wondering how they can legally sell them at all. yes, they are impressive vehicles and can be used relatively safely. but they are absolutely objectively more dangerous than 4 wheels.

Cleverdawny ,

I’d honestly just buy an electric 🛴 scooter first. A one wheel seems like a solution in search of a problem to me. But I’ve never been a skateboard guy.

What’s the benefit of a one wheel over a four wheel skateboard?

ManuelTransmission ,

I have one of each. I would say the benefit of the onewheel is a much cushier ride (giant, wide pneumatic wheel vs 4 smaller polyurethane wheels) and more maneuverability. The onewheel can tackle all types of terrain, which gives you a real sense of freedom while riding, whereas the 4-wheeler is pretty much limited to pavement/concrete (although you can put 7" pneumatic tires on 4-wheel boards that can accommodate them). Onewheeling is much more akin to that snowboarding feeling except you can pivot more since you only have a single point of contact with the ground, but there's not as much (any, really) of the lateral slide that you get on a snowboard, which can be both a plus and a minus.

If I want to go fast, I definitely grab the 4-wheeler. If I want to take a more leisurely pace/go explore offroad, I take the onewheel. I totally get and agree with what @fosho said about having to be very nimble & quick in a pinch, which is definitely true unless you're not going that fast on it to begin with. I rarely, if ever, exceed 15mph on the onewheel, but I can easily hit twice that on the 4-wheel board. Having to dodge something on that thing at that speed can be just as catastrophic as having the onewheel turn into a catapult at 15 mph. Both have their risks, and almost all of them can be tied to speed.

Cleverdawny ,

Thanks for the explanation!

bradorsomething ,

Fun fact, a sudden 30mph stop is about the same as falling from a 2-story building. (I used to teach PHTLS)

MooseBoys ,

Although it’s true you’re going about 30mph when you hit the ground from that height, it’s much more harmful because of the continued acceleration due to gravity. An equivalent scenario would be hitting a brick wall at 30mph which then immediately begins accelerating into you at 9.8 m/s^2.

Barack_Embalmer ,

I can’t help feeling a lot of these new motorized doodads are total deathtraps. I used to have a 40mph kaabo electric scooter and although it was mega fun, I sold it before it had a chance to kill me. Small wheels, poor geometry for stability, small caster angle, intoxicatingly high power - it’s a recipe for disaster.

fosho ,

the only benefit is the smaller turning radius. not something worth the much larger risk.

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

They just look dangerous. I get that they’re auto balancing, but still.

Comment105 ,

I’m wondering how they can legally sell them at all. yes, they are impressive vehicles and can be used relatively safely. but they are absolutely objectively more dangerous than 4 wheels.

Cool take, I also have one:

MOTORCYCLES ARE DANGEROUS.

Motorcyclists should be legally prevented from buying, owning, and operating them. The freedom to put one’s own life at risk is not a freedom I believe in.

Everybody should be forced to choose between 5 travel options over land: Walking, bicycling (standard construction), car, bus, and train.

No other option should be permitted to the public, the public must be protected from themselves.

fosho ,

it sounds like you’re being sarcastic. but the reality is that the line exists somewhere. motorcycles, with seats and handles, are safer than motorized skateboards at the same speeds. you’ll have to come up with an example that better fits where you’re implying motorbikes do.

BaldProphet , (edited ) in California governor rejects bill to give unemployment checks to striking workers
@BaldProphet@kbin.social avatar

Unemployment is paid for by employers. Paying unemployment to striking workers is in effect forcing employers to keep paying their employees even though they're not working.

Keep in mind that California is an at-will employment state.

elbarto777 ,

Just wanted to point out that “Right to work” is a union term.

California, like every U.S. state except Montana, employment is “at will,” meaning that they can fire you for any reason (except for illegal ones like discrimination.)

Rashnet ,
@Rashnet@kbin.social avatar

Right to work states are anti union.

elbarto777 ,

Good to know.

Rashnet ,
@Rashnet@kbin.social avatar

Here's the AFL-CIO's take on right to work AFL-CIO

I used to be a union member in a right to work state and we had no union contract or protections until a democrat majority was voted in to the state government and passed a law allowing public safety unions to collectively bargain a contract with our employer.

WHYAREWEALLCAPS ,

California is not right to work, that means that a person can work in a union shop without being a member of the union. You are thinking of at will.

Zaktor ,

forcing employers to keep paying their employees even though they’re not working.

That’s the whole fucking point of unemployment. The insurance rates are paid by companies, but it’s not their money to direct as they please for their own benefit. They’d very much tell ex-employees to go fuck themselves if they could, but they’re forced to pay into the fund that supports them.

BaldProphet ,
@BaldProphet@kbin.social avatar

My point is that it's coercive and will drive businesses out of the state.

Zaktor ,

Regulation is coercive (and good). Businesses aren’t maintaining safety standards and supporting their out-of-work employees out of pure altruism. The real objection for businesses is not that unemployment rates might be marginally higher (people are just regular unemployed way more often than they’re striking), it’s that this increases worker power.

BaldProphet ,
@BaldProphet@kbin.social avatar

But when you're paying striking workers to strike, you're incentivizing them to never compromise as long as the benefits last, which would be up to 26 weeks. Besides being unable to afford it, the state would start to see longer strikes and businesses moving out. I feel dirty for saying it, but this time Newsom was right.

Zaktor ,

Unemployment isn’t endless, isn’t 100% of your pay, and doesn’t allow you to take other work. It’s still always financially better to go back to work. This is exactly the bullshit conservative argument against having unemployment at all, “it makes workers not want to work”.

And yes, more monetary support for striking workers would increase worker power, I already said that. It wouldn’t necessarily cause long strikes, but it would make employers unlikely to be able to starve out a strike. That’s a good thing. Corporate/worker power is so amazingly out-of-balance that strikers are basically always in the right. Maybe with more power they could eventually get to the point where it would be abused, but currently anything that biases things towards workers is good.

SeaJ , in In Rare Alliance, Democrats and Republicans Seek Legal Power to Clear Homeless Camps

The author cites very few leaders. The article is really written in a sensational way.

Anyway, for the few people actually mentioned: how about fix the actual problem? We know of programs that have evidence they work. Stop pussy footing around and implement them.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines