There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

news

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

FlyingSquid , in Iranian reformist Pezeshkian and hard-liner Jalili head to runoff presidential election
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

“Reformist.” What a joke. As if any reforms can be made while the mullahs run the country.

Monument , in Steve Bannon must report to prison by Monday after Supreme Court rejects last-minute appeal.

He’s getting the Independence Day he deserves.

xc2215x , in Steve Bannon must report to prison by Monday after Supreme Court rejects last-minute appeal.

Glad he is going there on Monday.

notanaltaccount , in Can Biden be replaced as Democrat nominee? Who could replace him?

The conspiracy theorists all say Joe is supposed to step down and Gavin Newsom somehow is added to the ticket which then will win. These conspiracy theorists also say that candidates are selected in advance by the powers that be and it’s all pagentry to deceive the gullible masses. If this is true, then someone is already selected.

IndustryStandard , in UK: Rights group wins appeal over investigation into 'slave labour' cotton produced in China's Xinjiang region

Well… The UK is consistent in trying to cover up foreign governments human rights abuses.

IndustryStandard , in Undecided voter focus group disappointed in Biden's debate performance

All of the responders voting to replace him is an achievement

ZhaoYadang , in IRS plans to make its free tax filing program permanent

Well, now that Chevron is dead, this ain’t happening unless every 23-year-old Trump district judge in Alaska agrees.

Jaysyn , in DC Campaign to Submit Over 40K Signatures for Open Primaries, Ranked Choice Voting
@Jaysyn@kbin.earth avatar

All this circle jerking over RCV is missing the point that the isn't going to allow you to have RCV & have already made it illegal in at least 5 states.

Skua ,

How does supporting this limit anyone's ability to vote in November?

bolexforsoup ,

OP is wasting time tilting at windmills to attack people who agree with them while the GQP does real damage.

Jaysyn ,
@Jaysyn@kbin.earth avatar

I want RCV or STAR as bad as the rest of you, but this is all a waste of time until there is a Democratic majority that will enact RCV or STAR voting.

Because the isn't going to do that.

Jaysyn ,
@Jaysyn@kbin.earth avatar

It doesn't, but it's absofuckinglutely putting the cart before the horse.

corsicanguppy , in Can Biden be replaced as Democrat nominee? Who could replace him?

No, comrade.

bradorsomething , in Supreme Court strikes down Chevron, curtailing power of federal agencies - SCOTUSblog

If we clone harambe, will things get better?

EndlessApollo , in How the ACLU is planning for the return of Trump
JimSamtanko ,

A blog post from 2017? Really?

EndlessApollo , (edited )

The fact it’s literally an official statement directly from the Virginia ACLU, on their own site, about the actions they took, is overshadowed by it being a “blog”, cool

Edit Legit what’s the point of this comment? The ACLU defends fascist violence. They did it while trump was in office, they’re doing it now with literal neo-nazi terrorists, and they’ll do that all throughout trump’s next term as fuhrer until he has them all put in camps along with the actually vulnerable people they protect. ACLU is not your friend. They’ll just act like it while also defending the fascists trying to kill you. None of this is changed just bc this statement is in the form of a blog post.

JimSamtanko ,

My god man. Are you actually trying to say that free speech should be regulated to allow only what YOU like to hear?

The ACLU adhered to constitutional law. That YOU don’t is irrelevant. They said they abhor his ideology but protect his right to say what he wants. Because … that’s how it works.

Do you also hate the military? Because they exist to defend the freedoms Americans enjoy. Like free speech. Which means they also defend the rights of asshole wannabe Nazis.

You can’t cherry pick the laws. Do you see how MAGA conservatives circumvent and violate the constitution on abortion rights and biblical studies in classrooms?

Yeah… you’re doing the same thing by whining about how the ACLU protected someone’s rights in a country where they’re allowed to speak.

If you don’t like what people say- don’t listen to them. But YOU have no right to dictate the rights of others. Even if they’re asshole Nazis.

Now go ahead and accuse me of whatever will make you sleep better at night.

EndlessApollo , (edited )

deleted_by_moderator

  • Loading...
  • JimSamtanko ,

    It’s funny how MAGA bots pretend to have a cause so long as it reduces the amount of people That vote against their boy. I’m pretty certain there aren’t many people that actually believe that tire here in good faith.

    Because we both know that your gEnOciDe is going to be worse under Trump. And you don’t give two shits it seems.

    EndlessApollo ,

    I disagree with you, that makes me a maga bot cx it’s funny how liberals can’t imagine for even one second the idea that someone besides a trump supporter wouldn’t be 100% on board with everything democrats do. I don’t tolerate nazis, therefore I am one. Very solid deduction, another mystery solved thanks to detective samtanko xD

    JimSamtanko ,

    Well, considering that you hate Biden, and according to you- the military… right there seems to be two things you have in common with Trump. The third being that you don’t seem to ever think before you speak. Because nearly everthing you say is either flat out untrue, or rearranged half-truths. So it’s not a giant leap to mark the similarities between the two of you.

    And I didn’t call you a Nazi. Stop trying to be a victim here. That shit doesn’t fly. What I did say is that you possess very striking similarities to MAGA trolls.

    So, you know… if it quacks like a duck……

    kibiz0r , (edited ) in Labeling social media as harmful would provide a vital, helpful nudge • Kansas Reflector

    Well yeah. I mean, the big companies hire psychologists to conduct user studies to maximize time on device, and they model their user experience after variable reward schedules from slot machines. Seems obvious that they’re nefarious.

    I just have no idea how you can effectively regulate big tech.

    At every corner, the fundamental dynamic of big tech seems to be: Do the same exploitative, antisocial things that we decided long ago should be illegal… but do it through indirect means that make it difficult or impossible to regulate.

    If you change the definition of employment so that gig-work apps like Uber become employers, they’ll just change their model to avoid the new definition.

    If you change the definition of copyright infringement so that existing AI systems are open to prosecution, they’ll just add another level of obfuscation to the training data or something.

    I’m glad they’re willing to do something, but there has to be a more robust approach than this whack-a-mole game we’re playing.

    Edit: And to be clear, I am also concerned about the collateral damage that any regulation might cause to the grassroots independent stuff like Lemmy… but I think that’s pretty unlikely. The political environment in the US is such that it’s way, way more likely that we just do nothing – or a tiny little token effort – and we just let Meta/Google/whoever fully colonize our neurons in the end anyway.

    LeroyJenkins , in IRS plans to make its free tax filing program permanent

    unpopular opinion, but, as someone who can afford it, I like TurboTax as a product. hate Intuit as a company for all their bs lobbying, but I like having TurboTax as an option. I have like a dozen accounts across multiple banks and turbotax gets me done with my taxes in like 30 or less every year for cheaper than my old accountant did when I used one.

    PalmTreeIsBestTree ,

    I’d say then that’s great! It’s just that the majority of people have one source of income and should be able to file for free.

    LeroyJenkins ,

    yeah I agree. that’s why I included that the perspective was as somebody who can afford it and that I still hate what Intuit does. But at the same time saying I like the product instead of the TurboTax sucks circlejerking that the Internet loves doing.

    HubertManne ,

    Don't see why the irs version would not do that. Its just a gathering of forms that all go to you and the irs so they already have them.

    LeroyJenkins ,

    because they said they wouldn’t. the direct file program said they’re placing themselves as an option besides ones already on the market and will NOT replace any existing technology already on the market. so you still need to manually file with them. it’s not the situation where they already have the documents so you don’t have to do anything.

    Edit:

    The IRS tool is meant to be an additional option people have to file their tax returns and will not replace any existing options for filing, said IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel on a call with reporters Wednesday.

    HubertManne ,

    im not saying it is automatically done but you should not need to input the data. if you do then its pants.

    LeroyJenkins ,

    you will still need to manually input your information from the forms you receive. it just files your taxes for you. it doesn’t do them for you.

    HubertManne ,

    Well this is no difference then as free fillable forms has always been an option they provided for free with no exclusions.

    LeroyJenkins ,

    well the difference is that the government won’t go oops you traded a stock, so you need to use premium for $120 and also shove sales and dark patterns in your face to trick you into buying premium. most others that were free usually charged to file state taxes or something or another too. definitely a win for the average joe, but it’s not the process that people are imagining. the IRS has pretty directly said that they are providing another option to people and not making other services obsolete.

    HubertManne ,

    free fillable forms has always been free. its just online pdfs for the physical forms and the irs has been offering them for awhile. I have not used a physical in awhile. My point was if they can't pull the forms with the data its not really more useful than the current free fillable forms option.

    LeroyJenkins ,

    think of it as TurboTax free file made by the government and that’s it lol theyre a bit more than just PDFs online. theyve specifically said they’re making another option on the market alongside existing products. but they’re specifically NOT undercutting other existing technology.

    HubertManne ,

    yeah the only way I can see it being better since the irs already offered the free fillable forms is if it would autopopulate known forms like a w2 or 1099 (or is that 1098. I only know these things for like 3 months a year)

    Feathercrown , in Supreme Court shifts power over federal regulations from agencies to judges

    Fuck

    pwalshj , in ‘The Movement to Convince Biden to Not Run Is Real’

    They should force Hillary on us again.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines