Hello! Your title might not match the title of the article you linked! Could you please double check, and edit your post title if it indeed does not match? article title: “Russia strikes Ukrainian port cities for third consecutive night” (Similairity: ~42%).
BING BONG this action was performed semi-automatically by a bot (:
Good news! This should no longer happen, as the bot now runs every 60 seconds, so it will clear your post at the moment you post it (and then ignore it in the scans after that). Thank you for letting me know that this was such an issue (:
The only reason people crossing a border is a problem is when you are an authoritarian government trying to control your population.
I am not comfortable at ALL with the US having razorwire borders in common with North Korea. It's not a far journey from keeping people OUT to keeping them IN and conditions in the US are getting worse.
It's not infinite people, because there's not infinite people. There's only about 8 billion people and most of them are in Asia.
And how are our resources over in the US? Well, we throw away more food than we eat. (and a lot of our food production is actually DEPENDENT on migrant workers from the south who come in to pick fruits and vegetables during the harvest season.) We have enough empty homes to actually give every homeless person a home and we are still building. We have huge stretches of unoccupied land. Service industries are COMPLAINING that they don't have enough workers right now.
Yes, you and I individually may not have any money. But this is a problem with rich hoarders, not a problem with lack of resources. Our problems are policy-based, the scarcity is artificial.
A finite number of people live in countries that are too dangerous for them to live in because of US foreign policy. A finite number of people need to move from country to country seasonally to get work.
There is no good reason to hurt someone trying to cross the border. There is no good reason to throw a child into a river to prevent them from entering.
(and a lot of our food production is actually DEPENDENT on migrant workers from the south who come in to pick fruits and vegetables during the harvest season.)
So basically, illegals are second class citizens who don’t deserve a living wage. Every fucking time, you guys come up with racist arguments.
I never once said they didn't deserve a living wage. Jackass businessmen might not pay them enough, but that's wrong. I said our food production is DEPENDENT on migrant workers. No matter what we pay them, we NEED them because we NEED the influx of people to fill those jobs. They should get a living wage.
That you jumped to that conclusion on such a statement suggests you have been WAITING for a change to whatabout me, and tells me that you are not arguing in good faith. So good day.
Angel Novalez seems like the obvious pick, judging from this article, the other two would be purely political picks based on race. Novalez has actually shown a willingness to innovate and change the force to improve relations, and that’s the most important thing for a city with Chicago’s issues, rebuilding community trust and modifying how the police operate for the better.
Also Snelling having the “trust of the officers” is just a red flag to me, the officers just want to be shielded by a boss that protects them, sure Snelling may be good for the Chicago cops, but what’s good for them isn’t necessarily what’s good for the city, since the cops of the city have become part of the problems for the city, screw their trust. Chicago needs a reformer and that again seems to be Novalez.
Well the UK is once again making stupid choices. Hope not too many kids get hurt by this. If they are out at school but not home there is a reason for it.
news
Top
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.