There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

memes

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

PeriodicallyPedantic , (edited ) in No comment

🍿🍿🍿 Poe’s law working overtime on this one.

juliebean , in The best way to sort posts

i sort by ‘new comments’ by default. makes me feel like i’m on ye olde forums, and i am mostly here for discussion more than anything.

Soundhole , in This is Fine.

Don’t eat meat and it won’t be an issue, you silly maroons!

stevedidwhat_infosec ,

Surely insulting intelligence is a good way to convince people to join your cause

Soundhole ,

I’m not trying to insult anyone’s intelligence, I’m just being playful.

I have a million down votes b/c some weirdo went through my comments with a bot or something and brigaded me.

usernamesAreTricky OP ,

For reference for others, they do seem to be getting mass-downvoted on all their recent comments in their post history with plenty being pretty benign:

https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/ca25d94c-0348-4891-954f-9d9eaaedea89.png

MonkeyBusiness ,

The suffering makes the bacon taste better

HummingBee , in Quite.

Hit the g spot

Lucidlethargy , in When you encounter your own posts on other parts of the fediverse.

Is Mastadon just Lemmy with extra restrictions? Like, can’t they see posts like mine, which bare no character limit?

vulnerability , in It tastes like burning

forbidden cum

atomicfox , in Since we're railing on corporate America...

America bad! Europe good! I was really hoping we left this tired joke on Reddit.

name_NULL111653 , (edited )

Yes. I’m more middle-left, but this place seems to be going a bit far towards anti-capitalist socialism and anarchy. Capitalism isn’t the problem, greed is. That can be fixed with restrictions on what corporations can get away with - not ad hominems against the founders and CEOs.

Edit: 3 months of capitalist bullcrap later, I’m a socialist now…

That said, fuck Spez. That was an executive decision made solely by him.

Also, far anti-corporateism should probably be expected in a community that consists solely of people (mostly geeks) ‘on strike’ because a big company ruined their old platform…

MarxMadness ,

That can be fixed with restrictions on what corporations can get away with

The problem is that capital can and does react to this. Companies will bribe and lobby until they can erode whatever meager guardrails you managed to install, and in the meantime they’ll carefully calculate how much they can break the law before the consequences outweigh the benefits.

As long as capital is the main driver of politics this will keep happening. “Take money out of politics” doesn’t work, either, because capital will erode or evade those laws, too. You do have to look at moving on from capitalism if you want anything more than a small, temporary change.

Wrrzag ,
@Wrrzag@lemmy.ml avatar

capitalism isn’t the problem, greed is

Lol. The executive of the modern state is but a committee for managing the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie, as certain bearded guy said.

cma3246 , in It was a simpler time...

Unlimited mobile to mobile, free nights and weekends. 500 minutes per month. Good times.

altima_neo ,
@altima_neo@lemmy.zip avatar

I only had 200 minutes, but it was 30 bucks, so I couldnt complain.

drzoidberg ,
@drzoidberg@lemmy.world avatar

I still live like I have limited minutes, and can honestly say I don’t think I’ve used more than maybe…20 minutes a month? Maybe less. I just checked my last 3 bills, and t-mobile doesn’t list minutes anymore.

Rediphile ,

After inflation that’s like $700 today though.

outdated_belated ,

Oh shit, I forgot they used to do unlimited minutes only to the same carrier, so long-distance gf and I had to coordinate our carrier choices

Wooly , in sleep? barely know her

This post appearing in my feed at 3:58 am feels very targeted

PeriodicallyPedantic , in Ad blockers are a must

What is with huge tech brands voluntarily self destructing, right now?

Lucidlethargy ,

My theory is that they have been “inbreeding” too much by only hiring friends and family. This creates a cesspool instead of a talent pool. Try getting into one of these companies without an in… It’s not easy.

archomrade ,

I think it’s a little more straightforward: we’re at the tail end of a tech bubble. All these companies have been riding a COVID-19 wave and are reaching the end of it. They’ve been laying off staff as well as burning their customer good-will for extra revenue.

satnififu ,

The “we’ll figure it out later” mentality that plagued the entirety of the ad-supported internet during the last two decades is finally coming to it’s natural conclusion. Some companies have decided to tackle the issue by progressively getting away from ads (See X/Twitter, YouTube Premium), others are trying to hold for dear life and doing one last, giant push to try to make it work (Google, also YouTube somewhat). The next few years will decide what the future of the web looks like

quat ,

I’ve started to reconsider how I do things online. For such a long time it’s been the norm to expect things for free (gratis), and users became the product. If the choice now is being bombarded with ads or paying for a service, I’d rather pay a reasonable price. If I want online storage to keep my files backed up and available, then a small sum is acceptable to me. The important thing is to choose providers who believe in the open spirit of the internet, using free software, respecting privacy. I’ve submitted a couple of patches to the operating system I use. Etc. I want the internet to be a cooperative, friendly place.

Spimble ,

My guess is they’re not self destructing. They’re pissing off parts of the user base to profit more from the rest of the user base. I’d guess it’s all calculated and profitable. Except whatever twitter is doing that’s just a mess

Pantherina , in Friends, Romans, Countrymen, lend me your ears!

Difference: this dude is actually paid for doing it. So no ads

Malgas ,

Actually this guy did do ads:

This month’s public bread is provided by the Capitoline Brotherhood of Millers. The brotherhood uses only the finest flour: true Roman bread for true Romans.

db2 , in I love YouTube

Your ignorance is so cute! I could just punch pinch those cheeks!

What would you say to someone with premium that still uses revanced because it’s a better client? Probably nothing because there’s no script for that.

electriccars OP ,

I used revanced on sync for Reddit to keep it alive past it’s death date, though I’m much more engaged with Lemmy since Sync released for it too.

What makes the revanced version of YouTube better to you? Maybe I should check it out.

Catsrules ,

Sponsor block integration.

db2 ,

That too, I’ve been using it so long I forgot it was even a thing that needed blocking. 😆

electriccars OP ,
electriccars OP ,
electriccars OP ,
db2 ,

Downvotes for one thing, also removing shit I’ll never use, easier downloading when I want to archive a video, etc.

lukini ,
@lukini@beehaw.org avatar

Damn dude why are you being such an ass

SpeakinTelnet , in Haha
@SpeakinTelnet@sh.itjust.works avatar

This one goes right in the dad’s jokes book for future sights!

randomguy2323 , (edited ) in I love YouTube

What hoops? It just a few taps and voila you have YouTube free of ads.

BaroqueInMind ,
@BaroqueInMind@kbin.social avatar

woala

It's spelled wololo dumbass

randomguy2323 ,

Oh thank you!

Semi-Hemi-Demigod ,
@Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social avatar

woala

Is this a cross between a wallaby and a koala?

randomguy2323 ,

Haha my mistake

worfamerryman ,

c/boneappletea

theamigan ,
@theamigan@lemmy.dynatron.me avatar

At least he didn’t say viola.

AnotherOne , in I love YouTube

No, you love the creators you watch. Youtube, as a google company, created a businessmodel out of stealing data/private information and selling it to the highest bidder. I use newpipe, i never see ads but if i have a creator i want to support i send them money as direct as possible without middlemen (direct donations during livestreams for example). i pay the creator for their work. If google wouldn’t violate my human dignity by shoving a camera up my ass 24/7 i might consider giving them money to run their servers but as long as they try to make me a product they won’t see money nor data from me

electriccars OP ,

That’s a fair point, maybe I should look into using newpipe and use what was my monthly payment as a direct donation to my favorite creators instead. Thanks for the informative reply!

milkytoast ,
@milkytoast@kbin.social avatar

yeah I would say block ads, and then whatever u would normally spend on premium, donate to your favorite creators

the creatora only get 55% (which isn't bad all things considered) of the ad/premium revenue. by donating directly u spend the same but they get more

electriccars OP ,

But to be fair, if YouTube themselves don’t make anything then the service that hosts my content creators isn’t sustainable. So just getting premium feels like the most moral option all things considered, at least for me.

milkytoast ,
@milkytoast@kbin.social avatar

yeah except idc, google can go fuck themselves. if yt dies, there are other platforms, such as peer tube. not as big, but if yt goes to shit, that where the creators will most likely go

atlasraven31 ,

If they have a patreon, that would be the best way short of putting the money directly in their hands.

Catsrules ,

No, you love the creators you watch.

And Youtube makes that possible. Show me another service that is as good as Youtube is? Unlimited uploads for everyone, extremely fast constant delivery network. Require no logins or accounts to access the site. 4K video etc… etc… All for the low price of free with ads, or pay for no adds. They every are even one of the best at paying content creators. There is a reason almost every content creator ends up having some kind of account on Youtube.

Youtube, as a google company, created a businessmodel out of stealing data/private information and selling it to the highest bidder.

I don’t believe Google is in the business of selling data. There business is ad delivery. They keep the data to themselves as it is their secret sauce to deliver ads.

chris ,

They keep the data to themselves as it is their secret sauce to deliver ads.

I don’t think that’s entirely true. They won’t sell direct data, but through their ad and search systems your ads can drill down to very specific people and thus you know about them. It’s still crappy. It’s kinda unfair I think to outright say they don’t sell your data. You data is their core money maker. It’s just in a round about way. Sure maybe it doesn’t bother you, but in my opinion, the collection of data is the core problem with modern technology, not even just the internet. Data is extremely powerful and valuable.

Catsrules ,

I don’t think that’s entirely true. They won’t sell direct data, but through their ad and search systems your ads can drill down to very specific people and thus you know about them.

Sure you can drill down to specific characteristics of people but as far as I am aware it is Google that actually handles the interactions/delivers the information. So I am not really sure what information a third party could gather about a specific person.

But yeah I totally agree data collection is a huge problem basically every tech company is doing it. One of the reason why I try and self host as much as possible. To truly solve the problem we need better privacy laws in place.

beefcat ,
@beefcat@beehaw.org avatar

Google absolutely is in the business of selling user data, through their ad network. AdSense customers use that data to target ads. It’s their whole business model. Just because they aren’t being given a database with all that data doesn’t mean they aren’t paying for access to it.

Facebook operates the same way.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines