The idea that someone could buy a big one gallon jug of mace to refill their little keychain pepper spray is quite frankly terrifying lol there’s no way that could end well
Edit: according to Google you CAN actually buy a big one gallon jug of pepper spray, but only the kind designed for wildlife… That still seems wildly irresponsible lol
I think most things you can make yourself, if you’re talented enough. Might take a lot of effort though. But afterall, someone made everything in the first place.
I’m sure there’s some way you could in theory, but that really seems like a good way to gas yourself out of your own home and/or end up in the hospital from inhaling it or giving yourself a serious chemical burn.
And the government will pay him for his emotional distress because his unlawful use of unlawful unapproved spray has somehow caused him emotional harm.
It dropped 15% premarket and then went up a bit on open as regular folks tried to jump on the opportunity, a bunch of rich people made money and people like you and me are left holding the bag.
Why would you think “rich people made money”? They already hold the shares and would be trying to sell. It would be impossible to sell any large amount of shares after hours directly after a huge negative issue. If you could sell (say $1 million worth), it would be at a much lower price.
That’s probably why the price dropped. The market doesn’t actually react to news, it reacts to investors buying and selling. If the price went down that means people with lots of shares are trying to get out.
They bought the dip because they trade premarket then they sold to a bunch of retail investors trying to jump on the ship when the market opened, a story as old as after and pre market has existed.
They replied with their rebuttal to this comment to me and not to you, apparently because I admitted you know more than me, which is a frankly bizarre chain of logic that makes no sense to me. Apparently they know everything about what’s going on inside our minds and they can therefore make all sorts of judgements about who is worth replying to, but I’m more interested in the actual facts.
“Rich people made money” is a given under capitalism, it’s just a question of how.
In this case it’s called disaster capitalism. Any disaster or crisis, no matter how small, creates an imbalance and flow of resources, and capitalism is set up to funnel that flow to the already wealthy.
As to the details of the specific case, the other answer you got seems to know more than me about it.
You are using big words to try to sound smart, without understanding the specific details of the situation. There’s more than one group of “rich people” trading in the early market. Some are buying and others are selling. They are just moving money back and forth within the same “class” (as you understand it).
The other guy is wrong because in a situation like this there are very few buyers in the early market. He focuses only on the “rich” buyers and ignores the larger group of “rich” sellers trying to get rid of their shares. It’s much more likely that most “rich” sellers waited until the market opened because they didn’t want to sell while it was thinly traded.
So if you care about “classes”, the “rich” generally lost money because the company they already own went down in value. Maybe a few people bought at the bottom and sold when it went higher, but that was neither a large percent of “rich” investors nor a guaranteed return.
I’m explaining it to you because the other comment has a low level understanding of the specifics, while you admit you don’t understand. It’s more dangerous to think you understand something than to know your limits. I can trade in early / late markets but don’t because they have no one else there. The market has few other participants and that makes it too choppy.
I use my words to communicate my thoughts the best I can. If you think you can read my mind and tell me otherwise then I believe you don’t understand how reality works on a very basic level and thus your assessment of reality is worth very little to me.
If you want to teach me something you can prove it by linking me something verifiable. I’m not trusting the word of someone who thinks they’re psychic.
I don’t hold out hope for your reply, sorry to say. You went on the offensive so fast and I’m not being terribly friendly about it, so I doubt you’ll change course.
The rich who were selling at the time wouldn’t have sold at a loss (they would be those who bought while the price was even lower at another point in time, which could have been this year since in January or was trading at about 250 and it dropped to about 290 due to this week’s events), other rich people bought the dip and sold the same day to day traders trying to make a quick buck.
Didn’t someone just make a post about a game stream server that would allow multiple gamers to use the same machine? Not with VMs, but multiple users and virtual displays. Using docker.
You’d connect to it via any moonlight client, and it creates the environment for you to use the machine for whatever.
Yeah it’s a pretty cool project and I’ll definitely use it. However nothing can beat a straight connection from monitor to gpu, so I’ll probably use passthrough for the gpu when gaming
Im used to this from the whole “build your own gaming pc/nas” rabbit hole. Now it’s just some extra gpus and I might be able to have a two in one build (which will of course offset any costs for more 3090s /s)
Why use commercial graphics accelerators to run a highly limited “AI”-unique work set? There are specific cards made to accelerate machine learning things that are highly potent with far less power draw than 3090’s.
Not if it’s for inference only. What do you think the “AI accelerators” they’re putting in phones now are? Do you think they’d be as expensive or power hungry as an entire 3090 for performance if they were putting them in small devices?
Yeah show me a phone with 48GB RAM. It’s a big factor to consider. Actually, some people are recommending a Mac Studio cause you can get it with 128GB RAM and more and it’s shared with the AI/GPU accelerator. Very energy efficient, but sucks as soon as you want to do literally anything other than inference
I wouldn’t say it particularly sucks. It could be used as a powerhouse hosting server. Docker makes it very easy to do no matter the os now a days. Really though I’d say its competition is more along the lines of ampere systems in terms of power to performance. It even beats amperes 128 core arm cpu at a power to performance ratio which is extremely impressive in the server/enterprise world. Not to say you’re gonna see them in data centers because price to performance is a thing as well. I just feel like it fits right into the niche it was designed for.
Would you link one? Because the only things I know of are the small coral accelerators that aren’t really comparable, and specialised data centre stuff you need to request quotes for to even get a price, from companies that probably aren’t much interested in selling one direct to customer.
lemmyshitpost
Oldest
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.