There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

DeltaTangoLima ,
@DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com avatar

It should be climate action. Not saying it will be - just that it should be.

BruceTwarzen ,

There is a massive climate catastrophe before there is another even bigger climate catastrophe before considering climate action.

evasive_chimpanzee ,

Unfortunately, the “climate action” will be massive scale climate based migration from folks fleeing drought or rising oceans.

stoy , (edited )

Looking at the U.S. political situation, fascism seems to be getting closer every day.

In fact, if you look at a lot of other western nations, fascist ideas are springing up all over.

If feels like the world is even more crazy than it used to be, and the current period of crazy started in 2016 with Brexit, then Trumps win snd presidency, rolling into covid, then Trump got ejected, Russia intencified the war in Ukraine, the Hamas shat the bed and now Israel is going batshit insane, oh and during the two last years, two social media sites have decided to just oblitirate most of their good content generators, X is just fucking over everything that was twitter, and Reddit is slowly imploding since the apicalypse.

I just had a look on Wikipedia, and damn there has been a LOT of shit going down since the start of 2016…

Taalnazi ,

The ‘funny’ thing is that Trump never had won. He gained fewer votes than Hillary in 2016…

Similarly, Bush imo is an illegitimate president, as he didn’t gain more votes than Al Gore.

teawrecks ,

Via the popular vote, yes. But in the US, the popular vote doesn’t decide anything. Should it? That’s a different question. The point is they won the election legitimately.

We have work to do, but peddling election denial misinformation isn’t it.

mctoasterson ,

You saying this has the same practical significance as pro-Trump people who think Biden “didn’t really win” in 2020.

Which is to say zero.

Taalnazi ,

Difference is that my saying is based on a historically vested principle, simple as: one man, one vote. Instead of: your vote doesn’t count, only the oligarch’s does.

MrFunnyMoustache ,

They did win because of how the electoral college works. Both Trump and Bush lost the popular vote and won the election because the system is designed in a stupid way.

jkozaka ,
@jkozaka@lemm.ee avatar

Don’t forget Europe. Here, the far right is also racially motivated. My country’s (Portugal) far right party shot up in votes in the last election and has repeatedly villanized roma people. I hear the AfD is also pretty concerning.

The_Che_Banana ,

Spain is a minority led liberal government because of all the gains the far right has made.

teawrecks ,

The election of Trump in 2016 was the culmination of many factors from the previous 50 years, all of which lead to a very predictable outcome.

  • Reaganomics loosening regulation on corporations, lowering taxes on the wealthy, and defunding public education
  • Rush Limbaugh and Fox news fostering rural nationalism
  • the advent of the internet which allowed those people to find each other and exchange their poorly informed ideas
  • the perception that politicians were prioritizing “them” over "real Americans"
  • 9/11 and the resulting surveillance state and 24h sensationalist news cycle.

By the time Obama was in office, Republicans and Democrats lived in different realities. Republicans just wanted someone who was willing to stand on stage and spout their version of reality, and Trump is the right combination of insecure and stupid to want to do that. He was an inevitable symptom of a decades long problem.

MajorHavoc ,

Pogs are due for a huge comeback (along with all things 1990s).

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

WASAAAAAAAAAAA~!

late_night ,
@late_night@sopuli.xyz avatar

-AAAAAAAAAA-

grasshopper_mouse ,
@grasshopper_mouse@lemmy.world avatar

-AAAAAAAA-

MrVilliam ,

Maybe another yoyo comeback?

I’d actually be down for Billie Eilish leading the charge on grunge 2.0. We need angry rock music to criticize this shitty world.

MajorHavoc ,

We need angry rock music to criticize this shitty world.

Absolutely.

arefx ,

I’m ready for a new yo-yo craze 1996-8 was the last great resurgence

steal_your_face ,
@steal_your_face@lemmy.ml avatar

Probably more forest fires and other climate problems this summer.

mannycalavera ,
@mannycalavera@feddit.uk avatar

Israel and Hamas unite over a shared love of falafels. You heard it here first, folks!

mwproductions ,

I’ll just leave this here…

www.youtube.com/watch?v=H56lxmdUD1M

copd ,

If you knew what’s coming next you could be a very very rich human. This is how the world works

But to humour you, my guess is new portable energy storage systems. An increase in energy density

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

One can only hope it’s something that positive…

neidu2 ,

Yay, better hand grenades!

CanadaPlus , (edited )

I’ll keep adding to this as I think of more.

Lemmy itself, hopefully. The Fediverse has the potential to take off because it’s here and it can’t really die.

3D printed construction could be huge if they can get it to actually work well. That’s a big if, though.

Perovskite solar cells look like they’re almost ready to commercialise.

Grid storage batteries, if a good chemistry is found, could answer a trillion-dollar question.

Whenever Apple gets the battery life on Vision Pros to a reasonable length, they’ll probably take off.

AI ASICs, including those I assume such a headset would use. Some of them are actually analog, it’s pretty neat.

Ocean mining looks set to be valuable, and is pretty much impossible to stop every country from doing.

LLMs taking your fast-food order, and similar.

On that note, support services to remotely unfuck LLM mistakes that 0.2% of the time they biff it.

De-novo cultivation has been pretty successful, so you might start seeing weird new crops derived from wild plants become available, and start getting used as a cheap ingredient in stuff.

Hydrogen-grown biomass is really interesting, and could take humanity another trophic level down. That’s probably too far off to count as “next”, though.

Xenotransplantation.

Cargo airships as an option somewhere in between ships and airplanes.

3D printed aerospace parts have already made a difference, but I get the sense it’s not done. I don’t know what that means for you or me, exactly, if anything.

I could totally see supersonic private jets happening. I really hope they won’t, though.

On the note of technologies that kind of suck, postquantum cryptography will be a huge thing very soon.

The hydrogen economy, if fossil fuels continue to phase out. I’ve seen some neat stuff about metal refining with it, including a paper where they were able to use toxic aluminum mining waste as a raw material.

Arfman ,

Having LLM taking orders seems superfluous when ordering kiosks already exist

CanadaPlus , (edited )

The precise context I’ve heard about that in is drive-throughs.

It could be other things, like answering phones in a more comprehensive way than existing automatic systems. Even book keeping. Really just anything simple or repetitive that’s conducted by natural language, and isn’t life-or-death (so probably no ER triage).

belated_frog_pants ,

Clean Water wars

tsonfeir ,
@tsonfeir@lemm.ee avatar

Daddy why is the water red?

CanadaPlus ,

It still could happen, but so far it’s proven overhyped.

wesker ,
@wesker@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

The saying “fetch” as in

That’s SO fetch!

LarkinDePark ,

No. Please no.

bionicjoey ,

That sounds streets ahead!

LoveSausage ,

Iodine tablets

Alsjemenou ,

America has a real problem if something very bad happens to Biden or Trump during the elections (or shortly after).

The world has a problem when Trump is elected again. As he’s not known for keeping peace, or understanding international relations. In fact quite the opposite.

So the next big thing really is the elections.

…

Notice though how certain massive events are barely registering here… Imagine a third of Americans threatened to lose their home… But that’s what’s currently happening in China through floods, and rain season still having to start. I would call that big, 120 million people isn’t nothing… In comparison, 7 million died from corona (out of 700 million confirmed cases)

So this very much depends on your perspective and where on the planet you live.

maculata ,

Hats made of poop. It’s such a winner. Get in on on the cutting edge of fashion while you can.

The most chic ones are made from your own production plus random dog poo you find locally. Plus some grass for structural strength.

Chainweasel ,

Well, there’s serious potential for the wars in Ukraine and Israel to spill over into their neighboring countries and spiral uncontrollably into WWIII.
So although far from guaranteed, it’s absolutely a possibility.

agamemnonymous ,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

It’s still very much AI for a while. The current incarnation is still in relative infancy, and will only continue to get more capable and disruptive. We’re starting to see the integration with robotics, this is only going to become more significant with time.

It’s likely that the next big thing will be a consequence of AI.

blargerer ,

The current AI boom is all based on a single paper from about 7 years ago, and has been achieved by just throwing more and more computing power at it. There has been basically no meaningful architecture improvements in that time and we are already seeing substantial fall off from throwing more power at the problem. I don't think its a given at all that we are close to the kind of disruption you are predicting.

taladar ,

I see AI as something that will go the way of VR or cryptocurrencies or self-driving cars, it won’t fully go away but people will realize that it is not suitable for nearly the number of use cases or improving as quickly as it was claimed it would and will sort of forget about it in most of the areas where it is not really improving anything.

livus ,
@livus@kbin.social avatar

AI is currently being used in both the wars OP mentioned.

Its primary use is always going to be in Surveillance Capitalism. The idea we can get nice things from it is mainly a consolation prize.

I mean yes I can now get AI to draw me a picture or write me an editorial. But meanwhile the IDF can get AI to choose people to kill and use the Wheres Daddy AI program to tell them when someone is at home so they can deliberately bomb him with his family.

So yeah it isn't much for consumers but it's not going away for use on us.

taladar ,

I think those use cases show how particularly bad AI really is considering how many wrong targets they have been bombing and how many bad recommendations consumers still get.

agamemnonymous ,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

I don’t understand this deliberately pessimistic perspective I keep seeing around AI development that stubbornly ignores every other technological development in history. Even just considering the singular transformer architecture, we’re still seeing significant and novel improvement. In just a couple years we’ve watched the technology go from basic predictive text to high quality image and even video generation, now to real time robotics control.

The transformer architecture is incredibly powerful and flexible. The notion that the basic technology staying the same is an indication of stagnation is as ridiculous as if you said the same of transistors half a century ago. Most of the improvement we see in the near future will be through recursive and multi-modal applications, meta-architechtural developments that don’t require the core technology to change at all.

Sabata11792 ,
@Sabata11792@kbin.social avatar

I think we need to hit the wall and start over with what we learned a few time over to really progress.

Tangent5280 ,

Which paper is that?

blargerer ,

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.03762.pdf

Tangent5280 ,

Thanks for source

I_Has_A_Hat ,

“The internet has reached the peak of its usability and will never progress much past it’s current level”

This is you in 1997.

CanadaPlus ,

Was there actually a statistical argument for that? IIRC the main argument was most people wouldn’t have a use for it, in the guy’s opinion.

There’s stats for this. It’s not certain, but “we’re nearly at peak LLM” has become a reasonable guess in the last few months.

blargerer ,

I'm not saying AI can't be disruptive. I'm saying we aren't there. The steady progress you think you are seeing is bought with increased processing power, the science isn't advancing steadily, it advances in unpredictable jumps. Because the performance gained with processing power is reaching its peak, we'll need at least another one of those unpredictable jumps for it to get to a state that will do what the comment I was responding to was claiming. It could be another 50 years before that happens, or it could be tomorrow.

NaibofTabr ,

If it’s not one thing, it’s another.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •