There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

reuters.com

autotldr Bot , to worldnews in Eiffel Tower evacuated after bomb threat - French police

This is the best summary I could come up with:


PARIS, Aug 12 (Reuters) - Visitors were allowed back in the Eiffel Tower on Saturday about two hours after officials evacuated it due to a bomb threat, a French police source said.

“It was a false alarm, people can go back inside,” the source said.


I’m a bot and I’m open source!

SheeEttin ,

Yup, that’s a pretty quick summary.

smay , to datahoarder in Music Industry sues Internet Archive

Can mfs stop attacking the internet archive im so tired of this shit

kratoz29 ,

I’d suppose owners/main team would be annoyed AF as well.

eran_morad , to news in Judge warns Trump not to threaten witnesses in 2020 election subversion case

Lock him the fuck up.

Jake_Farm , to technology in Music labels sue Internet Archive over digitized record collection
@Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz avatar

The US copywrite system is fucked beyond measure. They should realy be based out of a different country.

SamsonSeinfelder , to datahoarder in Music Industry sues Internet Archive

Those companies are such a drag for human society because they are afraid of their bottom line. the Music Industry and Amazon also would have burned down the Library of Alexandria if they had deemed it worrisome to their profit.

SinningStromgald ,

And theres still no proof that every download truly is a lost sale. It’s all just make believe.

AnonTwo ,

I think it'd be completely unrealistic to think that there are no lost sales...whether or not the amount they're losing is actually meaningful would be a better question....

EsotericEmbryo ,

I definitely understand this take but there are a lot of things that I would have never watched if I hadn’t torrented it. Many things I do want to see more of I pay for of course but a lot of it I would just never have viewed or listened to in the first place.

AnonTwo ,

It's definitely somewhere in the middle. I agree there's definitely a good number of cases where the person downloading also wouldn't have considered it otherwise.

theodewere , to worldnews in Taiwan reports second large-scale China air force incursion this week
@theodewere@kbin.social avatar

oh yeah, lots of internal economic pressure on the CCP as their property market comes CRASHING down.. Emperor Xi the Eternal needs a big distraction quick.. and he needs to be a bully, so that people think he's strong.. and bullying Taiwan is so easy for him..

what a big, brave, clever Winnie the Pooh

autotldr Bot , to datahoarder in Music Industry sues Internet Archive

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The labels’ lawsuit filed in a federal court in Manhattan said the Archive’s “Great 78 Project” functions as an “illegal record store” for songs by musicians including Frank Sinatra, Ella Fitzgerald, Miles Davis and Billie Holiday.

Representatives for the Internet Archive did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the complaint.

The Internet Archive is already facing another federal lawsuit in Manhattan from leading book publishers who said its digital-book lending program launched in the pandemic violates their copyrights.

A judge ruled for the publishers in March, in a decision that the Archive plans to appeal.

The labels’ lawsuit said the project includes thousands of their copyright-protected recordings, including Bing Crosby’s “White Christmas,” Chuck Berry’s “Roll Over Beethoven” and Duke Ellington’s “It Don’t Mean a Thing (If It Ain’t Got That Swing)”.

The lawsuit said the recordings are all available on authorized streaming services and “face no danger of being lost, forgotten, or destroyed.”


I’m a bot and I’m open source!

Janis , to world in Music labels sue Internet Archive over digitized record collection

if you pay for music you feed a system that starves the artist. dont buy music. ever. but their merch, go to concerts or support them in other ways.

dept ,

and with concerts most the money goes to ticketmaster

Janis ,

in the US i heard its bad but taylor has enough to be no1 in aor pollution with that privat jet…so it might be still too much

Nihilore ,
@Nihilore@lemmy.world avatar

Unless the artist is on Bandcamp, buy their music there. On bandcamp fridays

Fuckass , to worldnews in Taiwan reports second large-scale China air force incursion this week
Corkyskog ,

You realize the identification zone is not the same as airspace right?

zephyreks ,

“Ten Chinese air force aircraft entered Taiwan’s air defence zone on Wednesday”

The article says ADIZ, not airspace.

IzzyJ , to news in Hawaii cannot ban guns on beaches, US judge rules
@IzzyJ@lemmy.world avatar

“Who needs guns on the beach”

I’m trans. Id sooner never go. But if I had to, with the way things are going, you bet your ass I am afraid and would rather be armed

ArcaneSlime ,

Hell yes. Make guns a nonpartisan “nonissue.” Armed minorities are harder to oppress, and gun control disproportionately affects minorities in marginalized and overpoliced communities. One state just removed the requirement for pistol purchase permits because (as it was designed to be in the first place since it was a Jim Crow era law) racist sheriffs were denying black people’s permits, 60% of denials were to black people.

ycnz ,

Yeah, famously, the US doesn’t oppress minorities because of all the guns.

ArcaneSlime ,

There’s a reason California has so much gun control, and it is Ronald Reagan being racist in the 80’s because the Black Panthers were exercising their right to bare arms, because it was making it harder for the police to oppress them. In fact CCW and purchase permits were designed and are often still used as a way to keep POC from exercising their rights, as it makes them harder to oppress if they can carry. They use gun control to oppress those minorities, things like stop and frisk, or denying permits and charging them when they carry anyway. They enforce this gun control primarily in overpoliced marginalized minority neighborhoods, not in gated communities or majority white neighborhoods. Regardless of your intentions or perceptions, the real life effects of gun control are these, and it is harder to oppress a person/community/people who have guns than one who does not.

sin_free_for_00_days ,

While Reagan was racist and was responsible for a lot of bad shit in the '80s, what you’re talking about with the Panthers was in the late '60s.

girlfreddy ,
@girlfreddy@mastodon.social avatar
ArcaneSlime ,

Girlfreddy was quick with it! But yeah, that.

30mag ,

That’s because, famously, gun control in the US targets minorities.

Do you think that is only a coincidence?

Armed minorities are harder to oppress:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wounded_Knee_Occupation

marmo7ade ,

Yes! The only way America will solve the gun problem is if we keep escalating the problem to a critical point. You’re doing god’s work. Thank you.

Instead of strapping up, I simply don’t go to beaches where I’m afraid to be shot. There’s more than 1 beach.

reverendsteveii ,

just don’t go anywhere you’re likely to be shot. Like school, work, the grocery store, church, urban areas, suburban areas, rural areas, bars, restaurants, nightclubs, daycare centers…

Without even addressing the moral panic and domestic terrorism currently being whipped up against trans people the fact is that “just don’t go places where people are allowed to carry” is a bad solution even for the average person.

Noughmad , (edited )

As a trans person, would you rather go to a beach where nobody is armed, or to a beach where everybody might be armed?

Established_Trial ,

I’m not trans, but I’d rather go where everyone might be armed. Just because everyone is supposed to not bring a gun somewhere doesn’t mean there won’t be someone that does- how many shootings in the US happen in “gun free zones”?

Fract ,

Only in the US. When I go to the beach in my country, Australia, I’d never even consider the possibility of a gunman.

solstice ,

I’ll foolishly assume this is a comment posted by a human in good faith and not a troll or a bot.

Does fog of war mean anything to you? Go to a crowded place where everyone is armed. Person 1 is a baddie and kills person 2. Person 3 is a Good Guy and shoots person 1. People 4, 5, and 6 are also Good Guys With Guns and didn’t directly observe the original altercation, they only observed Person 3 shooting Person 1, and assume Person 3 shot Person 2 as well. People 4, 5, and 6, open fire on Person 3. They are bad shots though and the adrenaline dump makes them miss, so People 7, 8, and 9 get shot in the crossfire. At this point it is total chaos, everyone is either shooting at everyone else (fight), running in panic (flight), getting shot in the crossfire (freeze), or just shrieking their head off at the carnage in front of them (freak). Then the police arrive and shoot the survivors.

Congratufuckinglations, we now have a bunch of bodies and dozens of traumatized people because you morons couldn’t leave your fucking guns at home and enjoy the goddamn beach.

I hate this country so much sometimes.

Burn_The_Right , to news in Hawaii cannot ban guns on beaches, US judge rules

If they can’t ban guns, they should ban conservatives instead. Problem solved.

Friendly Reminder: It is perfectly legal to discriminate based on political affiliation. Do your part to help fight conservatism by excluding conservatives in your daily life. It is not appropriate to conduct business or keep relationships with such people.

d16n ,

what about the liberal gun owners?

Burn_The_Right ,

Liberal gun owners (like me) aren’t taking guns to beaches.

Ubermeisters ,

Good luck finding a liberal gun owner who is bringing it to a beach…

S_204 ,

This is the twisted retarded logic that conservatives hold.

“I’m a piece of shit who wants to bring a gun to the beach, Liberals must want the same terrible things I do”

firewyre , to news in Hawaii cannot ban guns on beaches, US judge rules

deleted_by_moderator

  • Loading...
  • silvercove , to technology in Music labels sue Internet Archive over digitized record collection

    This is why I never pay for music as a matter of principle.

    I don’t care if it is cheap, or if the software is easy to use. I don’t pay for music. Period.

    c0c0c0 ,

    That’s an interesting principled stance. How should musicians provide for their familes?

    natanael ,

    Almost no musician makes any substantial money from music sales. Like at all, it’s genuinely extremely rare. Most makes more money from touring and merch.

    totallynotfbi ,

    I don’t think that 10% cut (or 0% if the artist still has debt) will amount to much for the majority of artists on a major label

    Kolanaki , (edited )
    @Kolanaki@yiffit.net avatar

    Buy tickets for their shows at the venue. Buy their merchandise directly from the band. Never go through a middle man. Deal with the musicians directly. They don’t really make shit off record sales; they make up the bulk of their money from touring and self-selling merch.

    silvercove ,

    Musicians don’t make money either way.

    mark ,
    @mark@programming.dev avatar

    I remember back when music (or any artistic expression really) was done by people out of passion.

    They used their talent to help people enjoy life more and did other things like picking up a trade for money.

    These days, people feel like they can’t do anything to help other people without being paid for it.

    c0c0c0 ,

    When was this? When did people who need to devote their life to a craft long enough to get good at not want, even need, to be paid for it? There have always been hobbyists, and maybe that’s all you want, but there has never been a time when musicians would not have preferred to be supported by their passion, rather than the job they had to do in order to keep eating.

    infyrin ,
    @infyrin@lemmy.world avatar

    Ask that question to Spotify’s CEO. Ask that question to YouTube. Ask that question to Sony Music Execs. Ask that question to Warner Music Execs. Ask that question to RIAA.

    Come back to us with their responses, I’m sure you won’t get any.

    c0c0c0 , (edited )

    So, because they don’t pay artists enough, you shouldn’t pay them at all?

    I’ve got the karma to spare so I’ll be clear about it. I’m not going to say you have to pay for music. That’s between you and the people you want to keep making music for you. You can fly the black flag all you want, and it does make you something of a rebel, but it does not make you any kind of hero.

    totallynotfbi ,

    Even if it’s an independent label or unsigned artist?

    Chadus_Maximus ,

    Paying artists ≠ paying for music. If I want to support them, I will.

    datavoid ,

    Poor take

    Static_Rocket ,
    @Static_Rocket@lemmy.world avatar

    This unless it’s bandcamp Friday or it can be found secondhand.

    VikingHippie , to world in Music labels sue Internet Archive over digitized record collection

    Oh no, did the two huge companies hoarding the rights to the vast majority of popular music in the world while underpaying artists and overcharging everyone else lose some potential revenue?!

    https://lemmy.wtf/pictrs/image/078d9d95-9405-4a4a-9e06-728d50302e04.jpeg

    rikudou ,

    Love the image!

    Hupf ,

    Way to !donthelpjustfilm, some people…

    VikingHippie ,

    Nah, that tardigrade is having TONS of fun playing the world’s smallest violin for Sony and Universal 😁

    nolannice , to technology in Music labels sue Internet Archive over digitized record collection
    @nolannice@lemmy.world avatar

    I feel like the Internet Archive is current day’s library of Alexandria and it’s going to get burned down for nothing.

    Copyright in the US is an absolute joke.

    x4740N ,
    @x4740N@lemmy.world avatar

    Internet archive should move to somewhere like Switzerland

    AceFuzzLord ,

    These companies will just push their blood money to there then. It’ll just turn into the whole PirateBay incident where lobbying got the original site shut down.

    Best way to stop this would be to get some heads rolling. Otherwise there will be nothing we can do.

    coheedcollapse ,

    Yep. If the Internet Archive goes down, piracy is going to be the last bastion of preservation for the masses. It’s incredibly fucked up. The whole copyright system is incredibly fucked up.

    I suspect after the book loss, copyright lawyers for huge media industries all over the place are drooling over potential earnings.

    Makes me feel angry and helpless, honestly. The people in that industry know damn well a rip of an old record isn’t the same as a sanitized digital file, but they don’t care about preserving shit as much as squeezing a few extra bucks from the super fans and history buffs who may enjoy those files.

    Spambox , (edited )

    The copyright lobby is crazy powerful and pretty scary.

    The whole Kim dotcom raid comes to mind. At the request them, the USA strong armed authorities to storm the guys mansion in new Zealand using helicopters and raid teams, punching and kicking him while he was on the floor, holding him for a month without a bail hearing, seized his assets and trying to extradite him because people were using his storage platform to store copyrighted material - which wasn’t even against new Zealand laws at the time.

    He later brought a legal suit against them for it and it was settled under wraps and sealed

    torrentfreak.com/kim-dotcom-wins-settlement-milit…

    Rights holders are also why your streaming platform prices keep getting more expensive because they just can’t control their greed. People keep complaining Netflix pricing keeps going higher for example but a big part of it is because they are being squeezed for more and more money by rights holders to have their content in their catalog

    infyrin ,
    @infyrin@lemmy.world avatar

    I remember following that whole story on TorrentFreak.

    Like, what a fucking exaggeration of authority force over what? Because a motherfucking music exec couldn’t buy another yacht? Lost a few “millions” from lack of record sales because their dinosaur model of profiting off of music isn’t working anymore? Like fucking wah.

    They treated Kim Dotcom more like a terrorist than Osama Bin Laden in comparison.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines