There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

lemmy.world

intensely_human , to pics in Cherry Creek State Park, CO

I bet below the waterline, after bicycles, it says “fish” and “submarines”.

MoltenBoron , to pics in Cherry Creek State Park, CO
@MoltenBoron@lemmy.world avatar

That stuff is gonna be hard to spread on toast.

DuckDuckGoneForGood , to fediverse in This might help explain the spectacular launch of Threads
@DuckDuckGoneForGood@lemmy.world avatar

I fucking KNEW it.

35 million users my asshole - they’re just counting existing Instagram accounts.

fer0n ,

Pretty sure they’re not. I mean those are instagram accounts, but only those who enabled threads. It’s also at 93 million now.

Why is it so hard to believe that people download the app and try it out? It’s easy to do, users don’t have to create a new account, the app is number one on the App Store, they’re probably advertising it in instagram, and it’s still just 20% of the instagram userbase.

Decentralization is nice, but most people don’t care about it and it’s too complicated or annoying to sign up there. Threads is dead simple and people want a Twitter replacement. It’s also “just” a fifth of the Twitter userbase.

RubberDucky ,

Most of the people just care for “the hot new thing” some just dislike twitter more, some are forced by friends to use it (me :( )

Is kinda weird seeing so many people on Lemmy just do not trust any data from social media.

The things of the fediverse is that everything is too complicated, seeing my friends signups for Threads they just downloaded 1 app, and max 7 clicks and they made an account, they thought Mastodon was too hard to use :(

zuhayr ,
@zuhayr@lemmy.world avatar

It isn’t very easy to get hold of for the “uninitiated”. Which is partially a good thing, in my opinion. Meaningful interactions require effort.

Cabrio ,

Barriers to entry improve the quality of participants.

damnYouSun ,

Setting things up on fediverse is overly complicated and could be made easier.

The biggest problem is it really isn’t all that clear what the pros and cons are various instances are, and the truth is that for the most part with the exception of a few particular instances it really doesn’t matter.

What might make the most sense is to have a website people can sign up on and then it just registers their account on one of a few instances to spread the load. Obviously that list I would have to be curated so it didn’t include obvious problematic instances,but it wouldn’t be that hard to do that. And that would make it as easy as threads is which basically is just an instance when all said and done.

CoderKat ,

And even if you do understand the pros and cons, it can be complicated because all these instances have differences and you have to figure out which one has the things you want and potentially make compromises.

Eg, I knew I absolutely must have downvotes and several instances disable those. I wanted to be federated with both lemmy.world and beehaw (and also lower my risk that beehaw is gonna defederate my instance in the future). I wanted as large of an instance as possible because by “fun” design, the “all” feed gets better the bigger the instance (IMO a design flaw), as does the ease of subscribing to communities (being first to subscribe is harder).

sudoreboot ,
@sudoreboot@slrpnk.net avatar

Something that would make it massively easier is portable/decentralised identities, or at least easy account migration. This should go for communities as well so that a community can exist independently of an instance, or be migrated to another instance with subscribers being redirected seamlessly.

Stovetop ,

Friends don’t make friends sign up for social media.

Thetimefarm ,

It’s weird to not distrust Meta, if you can’t see that idk what to tell you. In 70 years when a company is using detailed data collected about you since you were 13 to market nostalgia it’ll be too late. Even if laws get implemented in the interum between now and then banning data harvesting, whatever data is collected today will still be on the market and you’ll be an even juicier target.

DuckDuckGoneForGood ,
@DuckDuckGoneForGood@lemmy.world avatar

Why?

Because Instagram did the same BS with their “Notes” feature recently and now nobody uses it.

You were automatically enrolled and it showed up on your feed and three months later, it’s crickets.

As much as I hate Twitter, I don’t think Threads is going to make a dent in the long run.

fer0n ,

I don’t see how that’s related to them lying about user numbers, which I really don’t think they are doing.

We’ll see where threads will be in a few months, I’m sure not everyone will stay active there.

DuckDuckGoneForGood ,
@DuckDuckGoneForGood@lemmy.world avatar

I’m not sure how you can see it any other way.

They had a successful platform (Instagram) and piggybacked a new platform on top and are counting the users toward their numbers.

If Zuckerbag released Threads without being tied to Instagram, it’d be a queef in the wind of a userbase.

It’s a clever strategy. For sure. I won’t pretend it’s not.

But seeing how “Notes” went - I don’t think it’s gonna go very far.

It’s like if McDonald’s started selling hotdogs from their stores under a separate store within their restaurants.

“McDog’s has over 1 billion served!”

No, McDonald’s does - you just put another product under the same roof by a different name.

z3k3lon , to pics in Trail through the park
@z3k3lon@lemmy.pt avatar

Where was the picture taken?

jjnjjlr OP ,

Northern Indiana

z3k3lon ,
@z3k3lon@lemmy.pt avatar

It’s quite beatiful :)

WhiteRaven22 , to pics in Cherry Creek State Park, CO
@WhiteRaven22@midwest.social avatar

“Closed to bicycles.” Well, darn.

boeman ,
Flaky_Fish69 , to aww in Bad to the Bone, Dog in a Denim Jacket
@Flaky_Fish69@kbin.social avatar

LIES! There is no such thing as a bad boi.

Lifecoach5000 , to pics in perspective

This broke my brain

BornVolcano , to pics in Cherry Creek State Park, CO

Well those are some pretty wet lands over there I’ll give it that

FARTYSHARTBLAST , to fediverse in Lemmy Just Reached 1 Million Posts
@FARTYSHARTBLAST@sh.itjust.works avatar

We did it Lemmy! We’ve reached an arbitrary number of posts.

Boiglenoight ,

To the next numerically observable milestone! 🚀

FARTYSHARTBLAST ,
@FARTYSHARTBLAST@sh.itjust.works avatar

You did it!

MikeL ,

And beyond!

intensely_human , to mildlyinfuriating in Psycho ex-partner

Never give up!

/s

Wermhatswormhat , to pics in Trail through the park

Such young trees, it’s great to see some reforestation happening! Great spot!

Butter_My_Buttcheeks , to pics in Cherry Creek State Park, CO

It’s been very wet here this spring/summer.

Stamau123 OP ,

Namoiste, it was needed

ProvokedGamer , to memes in Uhhhhhhhhh......
@ProvokedGamer@lemmy.ca avatar

The people inside that building

yamapikariya ,
@yamapikariya@lemmyfi.com avatar
greenbean ,
Bluerat , to worldnews in Five tryptamines unscheduled by DEA

This is an article from January about something that happened last July. Is there something recent I’m missing on this?

billcypher OP ,

That’s it’s still getting coverage and circulation. That seems significant to me.

Bluerat ,

I’m confused, If it’s still getting coverage, why didn’t you share the new coverage instead?

billcypher OP ,

Is there any reason your engaging, or could you just let it go. I never said there was new coverage just maintaining circulation of existing articles. That’s significant in my book. Usually stories like that get buried, and clearly this didn’t.

Bluerat ,

Huh?? You literally said “it’s still getting coverage” so I asked where it’s getting coverage and why you didn’t share that instead, and now You’re saying “I never said it was getting new coverage”

I engaged because I hoped there was actually news on a post in World News that was interesting to me. clearly there isn’t any. Cool.

wolfcatreader , to mildlyinfuriating in Online dating

Kudos to you for demonstrating interest in getting to know whoever you cross on this platform (a rarity these days…) 🙌🏽

I relate to your discomfort. I usually unmatch or block such vibes bc the point of these apps is to date, which implies getting to know each other. If one is unwilling to put in the work (as minimal as it may seem), just spare folx who are interested in the above.

So much has changed in the dating scene. Sometimes, I am asked why I am being nosy or psychoanalyzing them. 🙄 Dude, you’re on a dating app, right?

P.S.: I respect boundaries, but such questions are essential in familiarizing oneself with someone.

Bazoogle ,

You use the term “you” a lot here. This is an old post, so you’re not going to be talking to the actual person that experienced this

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines