There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

lemmy.world

Damage , to workreform in My new company let me join the union on my first day, within their onboarding app

The F*** family

unreachable , to programmer_humor in Ah yes, the I in LLM
@unreachable@lemmy.world avatar
_hovi_ OP ,

That’s a penis??

Rentlar , to lemmyshitpost in Go already

The CGP Grey video on Traffic is a decent explainer on how traffic happens to begin with and how it gets relieved, kind of like a traffic snake that grows and shrinks, travelling in the direction opposite to traffic.

This City Nerd Video explains how traffic gets exponentially worse as it increases.

It usually starts with someone making a dumb move at a merge, changing lanes or another person forgetting to brake until the very last moment. That’s part of the reason I don’t see much benefit in adding more lanes to a highway save for very few exceptions, since you’ll just have more changing lanes leading to slowdowns and extending a section that was a bottleneck often just shifts the bottleneck somewhere else.

So anyways, I’ll keep preaching to the choir: trains, trains, we need more buses and trains.

kameecoding ,

youtu.be/oafm733nI6U?si=dUBMco9Ql-QtLF2a

Broke: thinking cgp greys video is informative and good

Woke: realizing cgo greys video is fucking stupid and car brained

Rentlar ,

Hey listen bud, I’m a massive advocate for trains and I think automated cars are an unrealistic idea in the near future.

Still, you have to understand the origin of traffic to get a better understanding of how to come to a solution.

“The solution to traffic is passenger trains” is a valid statement but is missing a lot of the intermediary as to how, why and completely skips the root causes of road traffic. That’s why I put the CGP Grey video 1st since that’s the first step, explaining traffic well even if I disagree with its conclusion, then CityNerd’s video 2nd. After the 2nd, the conclusion that public transit would solve traffic because it reduces drastically car volumes should start to come naturally.

drosophila , (edited )

While things like merging movements and so on is part of the story, it’s not the whole story.

You see, by saying “traffic jams are caused by merging mistakes and so on” it kinda implies that if everyone drove perfectly a highway lane could carry infinitely many cars. In actually a highway lane has a finite capacity determined by the length of the vehicles traveling on it, the length of the gap between them (indirectly determined by how fast they can start and stop), and the speed they’re moving.

There are finite limits for gap widths and speed determined by physics and geometry. As the system approaches these limits it becomes less and less able to deal with small disruptions. In other words, as more cars move on a freeway a traffic jam becomes more and more likely. The small disruption which is perceived as the cause was really just the nucleation point for a phase change that the system was already poised to transition through. If it wasn’t that event then something else would trigger it.

It is interesting to note that once a highway has transitioned from smooth flow to traffic jam its capacity is massively reduced, which you can see in the graphs in the above link. Another interesting thing to note is that the speed vs volume graph, if you flip it upside down, resembles a cost / demand curve from economics, where volume is the demand and time spent commuting (the inverse of speed) is cost. If you do this you see something quite odd, which is that the curve curls up around itself and goes backwards.

This is less like a normal economic situation (the more people use a resource the more they have to pay, the less people use it the less they have to pay) and more like a massively multiplayer version of the prisoner’s dilemma. For awhile the cost increases only slightly with growing demand, until a certain threshold where each additional actor making a transaction has a chance to massively increase the cost for everyone, even if consumption is reduced. Actors can choose to voluntarily pay a higher time cost (wait before getting on the freeway) to avoid this, but again, it’s the prisoners dilemma. People can just go, trigger a traffic jam anyway, and you’ll still have to sit through it + all the time you waited trying to prevent it.

Self driving cars are often described as a way to eliminate traffic jams, but they don’t change this fundamental property of how roadways work. It’s true that capacity could potentially be increased somewhat by decreasing the gap between cars, since machines have faster reflexes than humans (though I’m skeptical of how much the gap can really be decreased; is every car going to weigh the same at all times? Is every car going to have tires and brakes in identical conditions? Is the condition of the asphalt going to be identical at all times and across every part of the roadway? All of these things imply a great deal of variability in stopping distance, which implies a wide safety gap.), but the prisoner’s dilemma problem remains. The biggest thing that self driving cars could actually do to alleviate traffic jams would be to not enter a highway until traffic volumes were at a safe level. This can also be accomplished with a traffic volume sensor and a stop light on highway on-ramps.

Of course trains, on top of having a way higher capacity than a highway lane, don’t suffer from any of this prisoner’s dilemma stuff. If a train car is full and you have to wait for the next one that’s equivalent to being stopped at a highway on ramp. People can’t force their way into a train and make it run slower for everyone (well, unless they do something really crazy like stand in the door and stop the train from leaving).

Rentlar ,

You could carry a near infinite amount of cars on a highway if you could instantly accelerate to near the speed of light!

In all seriousness, yes you’re right that there is a max throughput of people per hour even with ideal drivers and cars on a given highway. You simply do not have enough space.

The article was very interesting and informative, but that too assumes many ideal conditions. Re: zipper merging, the author really discounts the affect of confusion causing on cumulative delay. Of course that never letting anyone get in front of you, and decreasing your headway will theoretically let you get to your destination earlier, but you run the risk of needing to detour to an auto collision center. In a 2 to 1 merge, one of the lanes must delay themselves 2 more seconds, everybody playing chicken instead of sharing the delay across the two will cumulatively slow things down on the whole.

This can also be accomplished with a traffic volume sensor and a stop light on highway on-ramps.

This kind of traffic metering does already exist, as you’re probably aware!

But the fact that even just a single rail car holds 360 commuters, equivalent to 180 cars or more on the highway changes the math completely.

drosophila , (edited )

But the fact that even just a single rail car holds 360 commuters, equivalent to 180 cars or more on the highway changes the math completely.

Absolutely. The fact that 3 million people pass through Shinjuku station every day is a testament to that.

If all of those people lived in a city in the US it would be the country’s third largest, behind NY and LA. (If we’re going by the entire urban area instead of just within city limits it would be the 20th, just ahead of the Baltimore-Columbia-Towson metropolitan statistical area.)

All in a space that’s smaller than most highway interchanges.

And that’s not even using two-level train cars (which is where your figure for 360 people per train car comes from I think?).

howrar , to lemmyshitpost in Go already

Traffic dynamics are really interesting. Even after you clear the obstruction, the traffic jam remains and becomes a “ghost jam” that propagates backwards down the road until it eventually fizzles out.

Crazyslinkz ,

I agree, I think mythbusters did a small scale test in a circle.

mememuseum ,

The Mythbusters also built a sweet plow truck that would get you through traffic.

brbposting ,
TexasDrunk ,

I turned down politeness all the way and watched it become Dallas traffic almost immediately.

hydration9806 ,

Unfortunately, the same thing happens when you turn it all the way up

TexasDrunk ,

But they’re much nicer about it.

Tlaloc_Temporal ,
@Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca avatar

It’s like a pressure wave! The boat is gone, but the wake is still causing you problems.

PunnyName , to programmer_humor in Ah yes, the I in LLM

The “W” in LLM represents “Wonder”

some_guy , to insanepeoplefacebook in The Second Sphinx

They’re all wrong. The sphinx is actually 65m years old. It was a dinosaur with a person’s face.

/s

Cyanocobalamin , to memes in The hulkster won't stand for fair wages BROTHERRRR

🎶 I am a real american. Fight for the rights of the rich men 🎶

sodalite , to lemmyshitpost in Go already

they keep switching lanes

grue , to android in Can any custom OS or rooting be done?

…the fuck? An RCA-branded smartphone?!

Considering that RCA is nothing but a zombie trademark these days, whored out to label what would otherwise be no-name generic junk, I think that the odds that whoever actually made this thing would spend the effort to lock it down (or otherwise customizing the software in any meaningful way) are low. That’s the good news.

The bad news is that the sort of people who would buy an RCA-branded thing made after the 1980s are the opposite of informed enthusiasts, so the odds of anybody caring enough to go to the trouble of making rooting instructions or building a custom ROM for this device are also low. Not zero, apparently, at least for the rooting part, but low.

Frankly, IMO it only makes sense to bother with this device if you’re doing it out of principle to stop it from becoming e-waste or something like that. If your goal is to have a useful device with root and a custom OS, the quicker/easier way to achieve that would be to get a more mainstream device officially supported by the firmware you want to run.

AndrewZabar OP , (edited )

lol hey I share your flabbergastiness - [I’m gonna go with _Flabbergastitude_™ ;-)] - about this. I got it in a lot of used devices and I just want the challenge of hacking it.

Most likely it’s made by HTC or maybe one of the Chinese brands…? I dunno. I know that some carrier-branded phones I used to have were just HTC models slightly modified.

So yeah, it’s just the challenge I want.

On another note, I’m also trying to do a LineageOS install onto a Galaxy J7 Sky Pro. All the literature I can find online is somewhat confusing insofar as getting the files onto the thing. I put everything onto a microSD and it’s in there, but I can’t figure out how to flash it. There is an article about first doing a file system mod etc. I followed directions but I am not seeing what they indicate I would see. It’s that way so often :-( anyway I’m going to next try something to free it because it has the message of an unauthorized factory wipe, so I am going to use droidkit to remedy that. After that I think it’s necessary to go into debug mode. I tried using the built-in Odin mode but it only says it can do update from sd card but that’s not what the file is.

Anyway sorry to ramble… I haven’t done any kind of rooting since I worked on my Zenpad to turn it into an e-reader. It’s so slow that it’s absolutely unconscionable that they would sell such a thing. These days it seems perfectly ok to sell a device that literally all it can manage is to load the Android OS. Once it succeeds then they presumably are able to release to market and not get their pants sued off. But beyond actual bootup everything is terminally slow, I have even seen to the point of a device just freezing up and shutting down lol. So they sell this thing that can just bootup and then it’s a brick draining a battery. Despicable.

But I am rambling again lol.

Anyway, back to the adventures.

AndrewZabar OP ,

Evidently it’s some company called Sonoma Communications.

fccid.io/OCVRCAR1ENO205

StaySquared , to memes in Complicit

Every single mfker that approved and signed off on supporting Israel’s genocide against Palestine should all be held accountable and sent to prison as war criminals. EVERY. SINGLE. ONE.

Rai , to memes in oh yeah

They shoved that kitten into that shit on purpose for a picture

Fuck them and fuck this post

nightwatch_admin , to insanepeoplefacebook in The Second Sphinx

I guess a second Sphinx is highly unlikely but not impossible, I would not know as I haven’t kept up with Archaeology. The rest of that screenshot is limestone bonkers.

FlyingSquid OP ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

Experts think it’s nonsense and the guy who claims it is basically a PR guy for the Giza site.

www.ancient-origins.net/…/second-sphinx-0016024

nightwatch_admin ,

Fair enough, the whole screenshot is limestone bonkers! Thanks!

SnotFlickerman , to programmer_humor in Ah yes, the I in LLM
@SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Similarly, the “S” in LLM stands for “Secure”

pivot_root ,

The “P” stands for “Private”

simple ,

It’s private if you run it locally

xmunk ,

The “J” stands for “Job Security”

ggppjj ,

Man, I never knew that my ISP was working so hard for me.

Vladkar ,

Will the real SLLM Shady please stand up?

doughless ,

You forgot the I.

gravitas_deficiency ,

Nah it looks right to me

doughless ,

Oh, you’re right, I forgot it already has an i for intelligence.

0laura ,

It’s very secure.

postmateDumbass , to cat in My boy got too large for the windowsill, but one couch move later and he's happy as a Larry

Aww even with no eyeballs he still goes to the window.

nightwatch_admin , to lemmyshitpost in Guess what dudes...

Toad’s an interesting picture!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines