Well, everything checks out. They used black ink and remembered to capitalize the right letters, so I guess the Binding Terms of this Contract really put the sheriff in a tight spot.
It’s the lack of extraneous gold fringe tassels that really tells you something. So many times these contracts are null & void right out the gate because some goober wants to fancy it up with unnecessary gold tassels.
This contract though… this contract is surely worth its weight in gold plated fiddles.
Which error is more egregious, “Comercial” or “Unitited States”? At least the writing is legible, so credit where it’s due.
Perhaps there’s magic in the bathroom, bed, bike, cloths and food that somehow equal a value of $50,000? It’s unclear what these have to do with the towed vehicle, unless it was a motorhome.
To be fair if there was any piece of mundane home technology that people have a good reason not to trust withouot thinking about any of it much, printers are probably top of the list
Those red squiggles that are under some words break the spell. The only things that are allowed to be in red are thumbprint and specific words written at 45°. They can’t make the red squiggles go away, so they have to write by hand
Aren’t most sovcit wackos part of the maga cult ? Then how come the guy that’s scamming them their savior is a guy named Yusef? Like aren’t they all extremely racist?
This guy is likely part of the Moorish Sovereign Citizen group since he used the phrase “overstand”. It’s a group of Black sovereign citizens who believe Black Americans have the right to their own nation. Yusef might not even be the persons birth name since they usually use a “Moorish” name instead.
Muslimesque, in a way derived from the orientalist kitsch in Freemasonry, like the Nation of Islam (whose founders started out in the Black-only Prince Hall Masonic lodges). Not Muslim in any orthodox sense.
It’s the only realistic option at this point. You can still protest the genocide in Gaza AFTER the election (and I fully support you doing so, Hell I might even meet you at one), but look at it this way: if Kamala wins, you have a chance to make a change over there, but if Trump wins again, every Palestinian is as good as dead. Do I like either option? No! Do I think our elections are a good system? No! Am I going to vote for Kamala anyway? Yes! Because at this point, the choice is between shooting ourselves in the foot or in the temple
That is a valid question in isolation, but bringing it up in discussions on where to vote is not leading to discussions or actionable improvements. It only functions to push voter disenfrachisement.
Not saying it’s your intention, but it is your effect.
Voting least bad is important. Don’t discourage it.
Working for better voting options is also important. Do push for that too, but find a constructive setting for it.
Seriously believe even on Lemmy there’s gonna be weaponized sockpuppets/bots that try to speak the language in order to discourage voting: “Oh if you’re really based you’ll just protest by staying home.”
“You’re a neoliberal shill if harm reduction is your strategy rather than overthrowing the system and rebuilding it into an enlightened paradise overnight.”
I fancy myself an anarchist in ideals, but I’m sure as heck filling a ballot for Kamala so I don’t have to start taking my “bugout country” plans AS seriously yet…
For a lot of reasons, but if the opposition wins, everybody who works for a living is gonna get waffle-stomped, and the only ones who will get stomped harder are those who can’t work for a living.
We gotta play the hand we’re dealt and deal with the biggest fires first…
They make a lot of intentional linguistic “adjustments” that are made for political/ spiritual reasons. I believe the switch from understand to overstand has to do with feelings of sovereignty and not being “under” someone.
The sovcits have probably borrowed this idea of making a political statement by changing language
I believe the switch from understand to overstand has to do with feelings of sovereignty and not being “under” someone.
This is what I was trying to describe and it’s just linguistic hullabaloo. The word “understand” has absolutely nothing to do with literally standing under anything/one. It simply means to comprehend. This under/overstand distinction is borne out of ignorance and nothing more.
lemmy.world
Newest