There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

engadget.com

MonsiuerPatEBrown , to news in FCC moves forward with its plan to restore Obama-era net neutrality protections

There is no fiber to the curb, and DSL rolled out in the US starting in the late 1990s.

Since then we have cable internet added to the mix.

US broadband speeds are like the US minimum wage.

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

There is no fiber to the curb

Why would you want that now that there’s fiber to the home? That’s what we have.

US broadband speeds are like the US minimum wage.

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/9c78a47f-33a7-4f3d-a15a-5e8188c6b30f.png

And that’s because I’m paying for the lowest tier.

Happenchance ,

They are not implying all Americans have poor internet, they are implying that most Americans have bad internet and are forced to use it due to non-competition.

TheGalacticVoid ,

My options are Comcast or 100 megabit DSL. Neither are fiber.

SoleInvictus ,
@SoleInvictus@lemmy.world avatar

We have cable Internet up to 1Gbps or DSL at 1.5 Mbps. Such options!

TheGalacticVoid ,

I’d rather not deal with arbitrary data caps and random added fees. Screw Comcast.

repungnant_canary , to news in FCC moves forward with its plan to restore Obama-era net neutrality protections

Does someone know what’s on the photo?

chili1553 ,

I believe it’s a series of tubes

Jerkingass ,

This is the back side of a network patch panel punched down with wiring that has no strain relief.

QuarterSwede ,
@QuarterSwede@lemmy.world avatar

Great alt text summary.

Yewb , to news in FCC moves forward with its plan to restore Obama-era net neutrality protections

Ajit pai can go fuck himself

finkrat ,

Corporate traitor ass-clown, glad he’s out

mechoman444 ,

Twice.

In one day

notannpc ,

With a cactus.

BlackPenguins ,

And no lube.

TheHottub , to news in FCC moves forward with its plan to restore Obama-era net neutrality protections
@TheHottub@lemmy.world avatar

Why does the article have to say “Obama-era”? Net neutrality is just net neutral and we don’t need to add extra labels to create a headline. Annoying.

ImFresh3x ,

Because we had net neutrality under Obama. And there’s lots of people who don’t know that. I’ve seen numerous posts back on Reddit and recently on lemmy saying corporate dems will never enact NN. When they did, and they are again. I’m glad the article mentions it. Because those history revisionists “both sides” groups are loud and prominent.

TheHottub ,
@TheHottub@lemmy.world avatar

I remember it well. We just don’t need to add to the already polarized political atmosphere by making it Obama-era thing. I was then and still am a huge proponent of net neutrality.

ImFresh3x ,

We do need to add to the polarity. 100%. Dems are not like republicans. And republicans are not like dems. It needs to be pointed out and made clear.

It’s the moderates who said “polarity” was “tearing us apart” during the civil right movement.

notannpc , to news in FCC moves forward with its plan to restore Obama-era net neutrality protections

I love that it was proven a vast majority of the public comments in favor of removing net neutrality laws were fake. But instead of just reverting the law back as a result of this discovery we get to fucking hope it doesn’t happen again while we try to apply the same fucking rules.

DeadWorld , to technology in British Museum is digitizing its entire collection in response to recent thefts | All of that scanning will cost over $12 million.

Why is the cost a problem. 12 mill might be a lot of money for like, some guy, but the government is responsible for the artifacts and deal with national budgets in the trillions.

If they dont want to pay for security storage and backups, send the peices back to their countries of origin. Maybe they can find some way of protecting history, cause England sure doesn’t want the responsibility

db2 , to technology in British Museum is digitizing its entire collection in response to recent thefts | All of that scanning will cost over $12 million.

After they’ve scanned it all will they be returning it to the countries they stole them from?

cave ,
@cave@lemmy.world avatar

Of course not. People can’t be trusted to take care of their own historical artifacts. Britain will take better care of them. If they want to see it, they can just pay to fly across the world to see them. It’s surely better this way.

fubo ,

It’s not currently up to the British Museum; it’s up to Parliament. Repatriating artifacts is currently illegal under UK law.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Museum_Act_1963

db2 ,
PeachMan ,
@PeachMan@lemmy.world avatar

Sure, but I don’t see any of the leadership at the museum advocating against that law.

fubo ,

Where have you checked?

PeachMan ,
@PeachMan@lemmy.world avatar

Where should I check?

fubo , (edited )

You could write them a letter and ask, I suppose?

It’s dishonest to say “I don’t see X” when you haven’t made any effort to look for X.

jaybone ,

We can’t do it because it’s against the law that we made that says it’s illegal.

caboose2006 , to technology in British Museum is digitizing its entire collection in response to recent thefts | All of that scanning will cost over $12 million.

It only took a couple hundred years for them to respond to all the theft they did? Better late than never I guess.

moipe , to technology in British Museum is digitizing its entire collection in response to recent thefts | All of that scanning will cost over $12 million.

A virtual version of the museum in 2029? What would be the point in going? I can look at a picture of a picture on the internet for free.

fakeman_pretendname ,

I get what you mean, like there’s definitely some stuff you can just look at a picture of it on the internet, but I guess for others it’s about the sense of space, connection, grouping, narrative, context etc that’s present with a well put together Museum or Gallery display.

Without all that, you’ve just got a car boot sale of random things - wheras the text, maps, illustrations, audio, video or 3d recreations etc that sits alongside - or simply the placement of things next to one another, or following through the room in a particular order is what really makes that stuff interesting.

cheese_greater , (edited ) to technology in British Museum is digitizing its entire collection in response to recent thefts | All of that scanning will cost over $12 million.

Cost of securing your intangibly and financially valuable physical assets for all time and ease of “sharing” losslessly with other museums?

Priceless.

Orionza , to technology in British Museum is digitizing its entire collection in response to recent thefts | All of that scanning will cost over $12 million.
@Orionza@lemmy.world avatar

$12 million - a bargain for digitizing the collection for eternity.

totallynotarobot , to technology in British Museum is digitizing its entire collection in response to recent thefts | All of that scanning will cost over $12 million.

The thefts weren’t recent, they started stealing that collection decades ago.

sramder ,
@sramder@lemmy.world avatar

Higgs is suspected to have taken uncategorized items and selling them on the e-commerce website eBay. One item worth $64,000 was offered for online auction for as little as $51 and listings for artifacts from the museum’s collection appeared online as early as 2016, according to a report in the Telegraph.

totallynotarobot ,

The stealing I meant was the British Museum’s acquisition of the collection, but this too.

ilikekeyboards ,

With all my respects if you repatriate them here in Mexico they will end up in some gangsters villa. The ministry of culture is weaker than their coked up limp dicks.

totallynotarobot ,

Oh well that’s a drag :(

DeathWearsANecktie ,

Lol that was my first thought when I read this too. Nonetheless, there’s zero chance of any of the historical artifacts being repatriated to their countries of origin now. It’s a big loss.

vzq , to technology in British Museum is digitizing its entire collection in response to recent thefts | All of that scanning will cost over $12 million.

Thieves all the way down.

WallEx , to technology in British Museum is digitizing its entire collection in response to recent thefts | All of that scanning will cost over $12 million.

What does it cost? How much of their collection?

I just read it 3 times in the feed, first post title, then preview of link, then op comment :D

masterspace , to technology in British Museum is digitizing its entire collection in response to recent thefts | All of that scanning will cost over $12 million.

Why the fuck is anyone writing an article about $12M dollars?

Do people not understand what rich people make from passive investments? Literally just repurpose a single rich person’s passive investment and you can pay to digitize a library’s worth of artifacts every year for eternity.

Society is absolutely fucked in the head if anyone is allowed to build a yacht without getting crowbarred in the back of the calf while we’re considering whether or not “we can afford to pay” to preserve priceless historical artifacts.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines