There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

SchmidtGenetics

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

SchmidtGenetics ,

A waxed car does the same… a window does the same… that’s literally not a reason.

SchmidtGenetics ,

They’ve been here for a long time, the issue is is when someone replaces their old bulbs with those bulbs that require those special housings.

My head bulbs aren’t bright, HID/LED sound awesome

SchmidtGenetics ,

They didn’t remove chrome because it glares.

And is it a problem? How many accidents are caused by glares? And maybe wear sunglasses if it’s sunny out…… take a little personal accountability when driving something dangerous if a fraction of a second glare might affect your ability to control a vehicle. Or move your head? Is it immobile? I usually shift my whole body if I’m parked and it’s consistent for a few seconds.

SchmidtGenetics ,

Dude #3 has 1 white pixel no?

Transgender swimmer Lia Thomas out of Olympics after losing legal battle (www.theguardian.com)

The US swimmer Lia Thomas, who rose to global prominence after becoming the first transgender athlete to win a NCAA college title in March 2022, has lost a legal case against World Aquatics at the court of arbitration for sport – and with it any hopes of making next month’s Paris Olympics....

SchmidtGenetics ,

Genetics are predominantly on the favor of the male side unfortunately.

SchmidtGenetics ,

No but taking the top 10% from each male and female athletes and putting them against each other, the men would still be on top 80% of the time.

SchmidtGenetics ,

It’s not a claim, it’s genetics, and what’s wrong with accepting that some people are better than others? It just gives her an unfair advantage from genetics(hormones in this case) helping her. It won’t make her a top athlete, who claimed that?

Would be different if the top male athlete did it, like say Phelps, there would not a be a women who could compete with them. That’s just friggen genetics.

SchmidtGenetics ,

There will always be outliers on both sides yes, but take the top 10% of male and female athletes and put them against each other, and the men would win 80% of the time. Because they are genetically predominately better at the stuff required for athletics. Wider hips aren’t really great for running for example…

Reality of often disappointing.

SchmidtGenetics ,

That’s starting to sound a little like an eugenics competition….

SchmidtGenetics ,

Does Crosby win 80% of the time? Mcdavid? Brady…?

Give your head a shake dude.

SchmidtGenetics ,

It’s not a claim… it’s the result of genetic study….

Wide hips aren’t great for running, not every woman has wide hips, but most do. So yeah some are going to be able to do it.

Now, almost every man doesn’t have wide hips, so they have inherent advantage right there.

She wasn’t the TOP male swimmer, I’m sure if we look at her fastest time as a male it would be slower than the top female. Her going over won’t suddenly make her faster, it just means the competition is easier….

SchmidtGenetics ,

Pardon my ignorance, what would you call someone preop and refering to them in the past tense? Especially when competing?

If someone was married, it wouldn’t be wrong to refer to them at that time as straight or call it during their “straight phase” and we are simplifying it. Especially if you don’t know their full story.

Sounds like you’re just looking for a fight in the comments, imma bounce.

SchmidtGenetics ,

Back to the discussion. It would basically be this if we took the 10% of each and put it into 4 categories.

Group A 85%men 15% women

Group B 70%men 30% women

Group C 55%men 45%women

Group D 5%men 95%women

It just doesn’t work. You would be hand picking less qualified men to compete with the women just to fill it up.

SchmidtGenetics ,

There is a thousand, but I find this Pretty interesting myself

SchmidtGenetics ,

In only one group would the women win a significant portion of the events? You basically created an Olympics with a bottom 25% female category, and 3 male categories. The women can already compete with the men if they want to, but they want medals too, not just to be there…. The best women would be overshadowed by the best men, you would only be showing off the worst of the top female athletes.

Expanding? When you need a d list male to compete with a b list female? Come on.

SchmidtGenetics ,

Did you read it all? Or just skip to the conclusion?

The introduction had great links with their why they are doing this study.

SchmidtGenetics ,

Please read the entire thing. You would see how it was on topic if you did, that’s how I know you haven’t.

Sometime in the early 2000’s Uri Gneezy and Aldo Rustichini conducted a very intriguing field study in an elementary school in Israel [1]. The participants were prepuberty140 children, 75 boys and 65 girls, all in the fourth grade between 9–10 years of age. The researchers studied the performance of the children in a race alone over a short distance of 40 meters (~131 feet) with the teacher measuring their speed. Girls and boys ran on average at the same speed. Then the majority of the children ran a second time with the teacher matching the children in pairs, starting with the two fastest children in the race going down the list independent of gender. Each pair ran on the same track, with the two children running alongside this time. Now, the boys improved while the girls ran slower. In eight mixed-pair races of 11 observations (73%) in which boys were slower than the girls initially, they beat the competition in the head-on second stage. In the remaining 18 mixed-pair races, where the girls had a worse time in the first round, only three girls won the competition (17%). To combat experimental threats, the researchers wisely kept a separate group of children as controls who ran alone in round two as well. This group, yet again showed no gender differences in speed and thus dispelled alternative explanations such as girls getting tired faster than boys. Based on the results, Gneezy and Rustichini concluded “Overall, we find support for the claim that competition increases the performance of males relative to females…This indicates that some strong, robust, and general factors are involved.” They then raised further: “The puzzle that remains concerns the more subtle effects of competition in homogeneous and heterogeneous groups.” (p. 380).

SchmidtGenetics ,

Coincides with the release of Broke Back Mountain pretty well actually….

SchmidtGenetics ,

A battery that lasts 8 hours and is a little slower, or a battery that lasts an hour… huh that’s a pretty easy choice, but yeah it can always be swung to make someone look bad.

SchmidtGenetics ,

The phone would shutoff because the battery would under volt, it was usually around an hour. So what did you think you were correcting…?

You’re being less specific lmfao.

SchmidtGenetics ,

Because the capacity was diminished…. New batteries didn’t have this issues since they were… well new…and had the capacity.

In a fully charged battery you could run demanding stuff, it’s only when the charge depleted that it became an issue, which is it couldn’t acces the capacity for the extra voltage anymore.

Without capacity, you can’t provide the high current… they’re literally related and go hand in hand………

Again, you’re literally explaining more or less the same thing, in a far less technical way… so sure to a laymen you’re “correct”, but that’s where it ends.

SchmidtGenetics , (edited )

If you had a new battery that had say 500mAh of charge remaining the issue wouldn’t happen. If you had an old battery with 2000mAh of charge remaining it’s very possible the issue happens.

Yeah… no… that’s not the case at all. A larger battery with more capacity that is aged would do the same thing as a brand new battery with the same capacity.

They’re a function of each other and your description is now contradicting itself. Capacity is the end function, without voltage can’t have capacity… you’re claiming otherwise.

A 500mah battery can’t provide the same over voltage as a 2,000, you’re claiming it can, come on dude lmfao. Without capacity, it can’t tap the over voltage needed, so the phone crashes and reboots, until you try the same thing. The phone effectively becomes useless after an hour since it can’t do anything demanding anymore, I never said it was dead….

Current is a part of the calculation to get capacity…. You can’t have capacity without current (A)…… you can have current (A), but it’s useless without voltage, and voltage and current gives us… capacity!!

Anyone else have this happen after grabbing a coffee?

I grab a cup coffee from a shop and it’s ruined because the barista is wearing cologne or perfume that inevitably has gotten on the cup and it’s all I can smell when I take a sip. I guess 2 things, this means 1 they haven’t thoroughly washed their hands, and 2 I can’t drink the coffee because it smells so bad and I have...

SchmidtGenetics ,

Do you keep hand cream or lotion in the vehicle?

SchmidtGenetics ,

Can’t they recuse or abstain from voting though?

SchmidtGenetics ,

How does that work when a standard door is 2.1m tall?

SchmidtGenetics , (edited )

There is absolutely a minimum size that doors need to be for almost any house. Yes you can incorrectly install other doors, but codes provide a minimum size for professionals to follow when installing. Which is 2.1m in most of the world. Other places will have their own standard size door, but yes every country absolutely has standard door sizes.

Why do you claim otherwise…? Just go look up any big box store door catalog lmfao, plenty of standard door options for even home owners. If you’re cutting a door to size, you’ve done fucked up in almost every case.

And it’s funny you say something like this while being completely off base about story heights… fucking lmfao. Sure we should listen to your “expertise” hahahah, you don’t even know how tall a room is, yet we should trust you know anything about doors? Really? Seriously… dude?

SchmidtGenetics ,

That’s usually from the previous home owner who thought they could install the previous door themselves and not knowing the difference between a rough opening and finished opening.

SchmidtGenetics ,

But it does matter… someone with vaulted ceilings at 12’ instead of 8’ would have this be 50% as efficient, which is huge.

The fact that you blundered the only important piece of information is ironic as shit,

SchmidtGenetics ,

Post driver! They have hand held gas powered ones now BRrRrRrRrRrRrPppPPpp

SchmidtGenetics ,

For what it’s worth, it’s perfect planting time where I am, still another week of potential frost in southern Alberta, Canada.

SchmidtGenetics ,

More not worth the cost to fight, so embrace it. Our city stoped spraying for broadleaf maybe 5 years back.

SchmidtGenetics , (edited )

The voice… Prana-bindu, there’s others, but spoilers ahoy.

SchmidtGenetics ,

The majority of force abilities is basically that. Voice control isn’t mastery of muscle or nerve, it isn’t magic in a sense, but controlling someone’s mind to do what you want for all intents and purposes is.

Also, where do you think Star Wars got inspiration for most of their force abilities at the start?

SchmidtGenetics ,

The sci-fi artists were really all copying each other and building off of one another anyways.

It’s the same with almost all art anyways, it’s “inspiration” by another word.

SchmidtGenetics ,

Well even paintings and music is usually inspired by something as well, it’s not just limited to the medium of story telling.

SchmidtGenetics ,

It gains value because people want it and people want it because it gains value is both a perfect description of cryptocurrency and scams.

Or gold, or any other precious metal, or any other currency really for that matter….

SchmidtGenetics ,

Haven’t multiple governments accepted it as real currency at this point? The arguments are valid, but fall flat when you actually look into each.

Hell diamonds are valuable because of artificial scarcity, so that’s a wrench in every precious metal argument….

SchmidtGenetics ,

The circlejerking and hive mind on Lemmy is shockingly worse than Reddit somehow. Not what I ever expected.

SchmidtGenetics ,

Even increasing or decreasing the length of the discharge tube will change its power and CFM and they’ve added 8”. There is no way the aerodynamics and the overall performance isn’t affected.

SchmidtGenetics ,

It’s also only 2db overall, the one frequency they dropped that much.

SchmidtGenetics ,

The team reduced the overall leaf blower noise by about two decibels, making the machine sound 37% quieter.

You omitted the most important data, it’s 2db overall, not 12db.

So your own “recalculation” isn’t even in the right ballpark as the correct answer.

Its people that misinterpret the information and perpetuate it like you are doing here that makes these look far better than they actually are.

SchmidtGenetics ,

The team reduced the overall leaf blower noise by about two decibels, making the machine sound 37% quieter.

It’s an insignificant 2db, I don’t know why buddy didn’t provide the relevant information.

SchmidtGenetics ,

The team reduced the overall leaf blower noise by about two decibels, making the machine sound 37% quieter.

It’s an insignificant 2db, I don’t know why buddy didn’t provide the relevant information.

SchmidtGenetics ,

The team reduced the overall leaf blower noise by about two decibels, making the machine sound 37% quieter.

It’s an insignificant 2db, I don’t know why buddy didn’t provide the relevant information.

SchmidtGenetics , (edited )

They provided the DB data so your argument for all of those reasons is invalid. They could have easily spent a single sentence providing the CFM data. So no, not a single one of those reasons is valid to omit 6 words.

They made a claim, they didn’t need to mention the power claim, but they did. They should have omitted the claim itself using your logic, instead of the supporting data. The argument is flawed itself.

and we commonly have to accept that a certain presupposed level of knowledge as well as ambiguity is necessary.

Like knowing making a discharge tube longer or shorter affects its aerodynamics….? So we know the claim is false already…? Their ambiguity is meant to mislead people with zero working knowledge of the subject… anyone with any experience will see its flaw immediately.

SchmidtGenetics ,

We agree that the -12dB is what’s important for human hearing … Now, you may agree that the 94% reduction is what counts regarding engineering // fabrication // design.

-2db* and 37%*

Why are you perpetuating the wrong information?

SchmidtGenetics ,

Is it? Because the next sentence in the paragraph (and the only sentence missing in the quote) is the overall sound reduction. Which is far more important and far less misleading than saying 12db and 94% quieter.

Its intentionally misleading to deceive people, and than the general public incorrectly defends it, this is you.

SchmidtGenetics ,

So they can talk about the relevant commercialization technical bits (the db) and they can’t talk about the part that’s not…? Uhh… what…?

Is that your argument? Does that make any sense to you…? The part that should be restricted is being talked about freely… and the part that shouldn’t be restricted is…? You’re defending the system that’s backwards. And you want to call me naive and obtuse… okay, defend marketing fluff that you ate up like they were expecting….

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •