There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

ronsboy67 , to bookstodon
@ronsboy67@mas.to avatar

In my semi-sentient opinion and is a much misunderstood art (ha!) - getting the balance between "pop" and "sci" or between "sci" and "comm" seems very tricky. Not so for the author of Sticky
@bookstodon https://scicomm.xyz/@LaurieWinkless/112754196229031482

maitri , to random
@maitri@c.im avatar

It occurs to me that, since the demise of Twitter and the half-hearted move to Mastodon, most of my communication on social media is only with people I know. My brain is currently actively calculating if this is a good or a bad thing.

I do miss old Science Twitter, however. Is that still a thing here or elsewhere in another form? Is everyone partying without me? Leads welcomed.

SciBeh , to philosophy
@SciBeh@mastodon.online avatar

Wed/Thursday next week March 6/7: Scibeh 2024 virtual workshop on the boundaries of expertise.

the workshop involves talks, panels, Zoom-based group discussions, forum discussions before, during and after, and concrete outputs that participants determine and develop

join us now!

https://www.scibeh.org/events/workshop2024/

@philosophy

TheConversationUS , to academicchatter
@TheConversationUS@newsie.social avatar

Peer review theoretically works to improve – weeding out mistakes and highlighting the most valuable insights.

But politics and reliance on free labor are among factors that undermine the process
https://theconversation.com/peer-review-isnt-perfect-i-know-because-i-teach-others-how-to-do-it-and-ive-seen-firsthand-how-it-comes-up-short-222445
@academicchatter

NikaShilobod , to phdstudents
@NikaShilobod@fediscience.org avatar

I am looking for and and people who want to do some AMA-style events on Lemmy. The few I ran on Reddit were fun, and it makes an excellent opportunity for public outreach as people feel comfortable in an informal space, ECRs especially. These are great if you have a paper you want to rizz too. It's a good outreach thing; I always think 1:1 talking to people is the most successful and impactful. @phdstudents @academicchatter

UlrikeHahn , to philosophy
@UlrikeHahn@fediscience.org avatar

When scientists make erroneous pronouncements outside their area of expertise that's misinformation. When they make predictions that prove wrong that can be hugely consequential. How do we stop ourselves from doing this and how do we recognise epistemic trespass in others? What actually constitutes 'expertise', particularly in novel, interdisciplinary contexts ?

Join the scibeh.org 2024 online workshop to help us all work this out

https://www.scibeh.org/events/workshop2024/

@philosophy

ecology_revised , to academicchatter
@ecology_revised@fediscience.org avatar

After 20+ yrs of misusing journal impact factors for evaluating scientific quality and potential, there is not only a huge dilution of the literature by paper mills, but also bribery of editors to get those papers “accepted”.

@academicchatter

https://www.science.org/content/article/paper-mills-bribing-editors-scholarly-journals-science-investigation-finds

NatureMC , to writers
@NatureMC@mastodon.online avatar

What does AI have to do with bratwurst and how do you interview a blob? A look behind the scenes of my podcast and why I interview the more-than-human world. But how the hell and why do you interview a bat and a cactus? https://www.cronenburg.net/scicomm/ @writers

kkormas , to academicsunite
@kkormas@mstdn.science avatar
kkormas , to academicsunite
@kkormas@mstdn.science avatar
kkormas , to phdstudents
@kkormas@mstdn.science avatar
kkormas , to phdstudents
@kkormas@mstdn.science avatar
kkormas , to academicsunite
@kkormas@mstdn.science avatar

finished yesterday, 3 days of the most recent research by ca. 320 scientists from several countries. Next one in 2 years from now!

https://afea.eventsair.com/10th-conference-of-mikrobiokosmos/program

@IMPACTT @MicrobioJC @academicchatter @academicsunite @openscience

hosmic , to academicchatter
@hosmic@fediscience.org avatar
hosmic , (edited ) to academicchatter
@hosmic@fediscience.org avatar
kkormas , to academicchatter
@kkormas@mstdn.science avatar
kkormas , to academicsunite
@kkormas@mstdn.science avatar
kkormas , to academicchatter
@kkormas@mstdn.science avatar

It breaks my heart thinking about all the who were ready to start their new or in foreign countries and now they have to give up because they cannot travel from many more countries other than and

fediverse
@phdlife @PhD_Genie @phdstudents
@academicchatter

kkormas , to phdlife
@kkormas@mstdn.science avatar
kkormas , to academicsunite
@kkormas@mstdn.science avatar
kkormas , to academicchatter
@kkormas@mstdn.science avatar

Have you ever been to "shows of technological muscle"??? Awesome editorial!

Don't show us your instrument park: Give us your students/give us to your students!

https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.14326

@phdlife @PhD_Genie @phdstudents
@academicchatter

kkormas , to academicsunite
@kkormas@mstdn.science avatar
erinnacland , to academicchatter
@erinnacland@fediscience.org avatar

Want to avoid potential predatory publishers showing up in your google scholar search results?

Add, for example, "-source:MDPI" after your search term.

You can remove multiple publishers this way. E.g. "emotion recognition and externalizing -source:MDPI -source:hindawi"

@academicchatter
Thanks @danmacdonald for the tip

rglueckler , to academicsunite
@rglueckler@fediscience.org avatar

Misleading arguments: spreading like a 🔥

For a German anti-fake-news blog, I've refuted three common but nonsensical arguments designed to deny an impact of on .

You can see the full article here (in German):
https://www.volksverpetzer.de/analyse/waldbrand-fakes-erkennen-widerlegen/

In the following responses you'll find the basic points summarized!

@wildfirescience @paleofire @ecology @academicchatter @academicsunite @ClimateMigration

(1/3)

ml , to random
@ml@ecoevo.social avatar

NWS continues to flout ADA and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act...after the breaches have been repeatedly brought to their attention

Don't tell me ableism in STEM is no big deal. What the hell use is your if you refuse to communicate important data (weather alerts, warnings, disasters) accessibly? Eugenics, is what it ends up being.

ml OP , (edited )
@ml@ecoevo.social avatar

While on the subject, AAPD has a call out for testimonials to the US Dept of Justice as to how digital inaccessibility affects you. Comments need to be received by Oct 2: https://aapd.quorum.us/campaign/51385/

@disability

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines