There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

DragonAce ,

These mfers watched “Joan is Awful” from season 6 of Black Mirror and said. LETS DO THAT!!

taanegl ,

Sigh… Guess we gotta copyright the human body and face. I fucking hate this timeline.

squirrel ,
@squirrel@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Personality rights are already a thing. They are a mess in the US though.

speaker_hat , (edited )

This is lawyers fuel

77slevin ,

Like an onion or like a cake?

sndrtj ,

Portrait rights - i.e. the right the own one’s image - is a thing in some European jurisdictions. But of course this doesn’t exist in the US.

jandar_fett ,

Nice thumbnail

MeetInPotatoes ,

Creepy ass motherfuckers. You’d almost have to be a studio exec to think this is even something you should ask.

4am ,
@4am@lemmy.world avatar

No one saw “S1m0ne” 20 years ago because they thought it was too far fetched.

Dvixen ,

Go back even further to Looker from 1981.

BotoCorDeRosa ,

I’m almost certain there was a movie like this. A guy create a AI celebrity and he fall in love with her. I believe he “kills” her in the end.

I don’t remember if the public end up knowing if she was fake or not.

cleric10 ,

S1mone?

can ,

How the hell do you pronounce that? No wonder they couldn’t remember the name.

133arc585 ,
@133arc585@lemmy.ml avatar

Someone correct me if I’m wrong but my first guess is: you pronounce is like the moderately common name Simone.

can ,

I’m confident you’re correct. I over complicated it.

_fov ,

But it also alludes to “sim one”, as in the first simulated actor. It is a play on words.

OhHiMarx ,

Way too abstract for your average American to understand

can ,

Thank you for the context.

dancing_umbra ,

Episode 1 of Black Mirror Season 6

onionbaggage ,

Salma Hayek is gonna be piiiiisssseeddd!!

1hitsong ,
@1hitsong@lemmy.ml avatar

You had me poop in a church?!

socsa ,

sigh

Aurenkin ,

I wonder who the last famous actor will be

Jdreben ,
@Jdreben@mastodon.world avatar

@Aurenkin @igalmarino Well we'll still have soccer players

Cabrio ,

Please, I’ve seen AI robots that flop better.

s7ryph ,

The Critic did it instead of the Simpsons this time.

dingus ,
@dingus@lemmy.ml avatar

It Stinks!

whatsarefoogee ,

Don’t we already have pretty robust laws when it comes to person’s likeness?

I presume most contracts cover this aspect mainly for the purposes of marketing and future references. Of course the actors probably didn’t expect the extent the current technology could allow their likeness to be exploited.

It would probably make sense to require more specific contracts for this purpose, and have previously signed general contracts become insufficient for using actors’ likeness for this purpose.

buckykat ,

If a corporation puts their crimes inside a computer, they can get away with it for years before anybody figures out how to do anything about it.

lemmyvore ,

It’s not really that complicated if there’s a will and resources to investigate. You can legally compel someone to produce evidence or show you how they do things whether it’s in an Excel file or in a paper ledger.

Conversely, you can burn a paper ledger just as easily as you can delete a computer file. In fact computer files might actually be more resilient since they can be recovered if not properly destroyed.

Sarsaparilla ,
@Sarsaparilla@kbin.social avatar

They say they are expected to accept contracts that were designed for the old business model while the industry structure and technologies have changed. Here's some video of the speeches & demonstrations.

PipedLinkBot ,

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): piped.video/watch?v=9jBBItLnxRc

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.

jandar_fett ,

Good bot.

yogsototh ,
@yogsototh@programming.dev avatar

“The congress” is coming closer.

www.themoviedb.org/movie/152795-the-congress

I understand why some people might not like this movie. But I think about it a few times a week. And one major part of the scenario is about a famous actor giving her digital copy to a studio and the unforeseen consequences.

inspxtr ,

Yeah these recent events really do start to look like The congress. I watched it only recently due to one of such events. Not sure I fully understand why people dont like it.

Anyway, the second half of it is just so eery, the reality distortion part, is sometimes both inspiring and uncomfortable. And I think there’s some potential parallel with generative AI.

With Dalle/ChatGPT, one may create virtually anything from already available data, just like people in the 2nd half can take on any form, which is inspiring to me.

But at some point, I guess both can lead to some loss in meanings, detached from reality. And eventually, instead of embracing beauty in diversity, people might turn to or get normalized to bias and conformity. Like how GAI may exacerbate unrealistic beauty standards, and how those people tend to choose only certain forms/figures to “be”.

elsewhere ,
@elsewhere@feddit.ch avatar

First thing I thought of when reading the title. The movie is 10 years old!

grey ,
@grey@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

I wish I blogged about how I thought this would happen back when I first saw that Tupac hologram years ago. www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGbrFmPBV0Y

PipedLinkBot ,

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): piped.video/watch?v=TGbrFmPBV0Y

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.

grey ,
@grey@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

Good bot.

speck ,

Man, this is reminding of horror comic book story from like 40 years ago. Actress signs away the rights to her own appearance, has to be disfigured or something because she's no longer allowed to look like herself

Sarsaparilla ,
@Sarsaparilla@kbin.social avatar

I think a time will come in our dystopian future where it will be trendy to have a performance by a real actor or a traditional painting created by a real artist ... that will be the gimmick, so to say.

Roundcat ,
@Roundcat@kbin.social avatar

As long as I can help it or afford it, I will always prefer human art over machines.

The reality is works produced by humans are going to be a luxury for the rich, while the poor have to setting for AI generated crap.

Jimbo ,
@Jimbo@yiffit.net avatar

I have everything related to AI art in my all feed blocked, if I’m going to have art in my feed it’s going to be made by a human dammit

As a furry I see so many small artists struggling, I’m not gonna contribute to their competition lol

Roundcat ,
@Roundcat@kbin.social avatar

As a furry art appreciator, I want to do what I can to make sure the community's artists aren't struggling.

Dee ,
@Dee@lemmy.world avatar

As a non-furry artist seeing how much the furry community supports small artists is really making me consider doing furry art lol

donuts ,
@donuts@kbin.social avatar

Hear, hear! If pop culture is gonna be a frothy cesspool of AI generated shit, I'm going all in on subculture.

absentthereaper ,
@absentthereaper@lemmygrad.ml avatar

Fuckin A, “Lifetime Achievement Award” is becoming real life way quicker than it was supposed to.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • [email protected]
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •