Discord lowers free upload limit to 10MB: “Storage management is expensive”

foreverandaday , 6 days ago

good ol’ capitalism, corporations need ever growing profits

EmperorHenry , 6 days ago

I’ve never sent a picture through discord.

Also, if storing all that data is hard…trim all the chat logs after awhile…oh wait…then you wouldn’t be able to keep records of everything everyone’s ever done on there.

lemmywinksthegerbilking , 6 days ago

to be fair though, the limit was 8MB originally, then they raised it to 25MB

interdimensionalmeme , 6 days ago

Easy fix, don’t store any of it on the cloud. The client’s PC has plenty more than 25MB

UltraGiGaGigantic , 6 days ago

Is there a discord replacement that isn’t matrix that does this?

interdimensionalmeme , 5 days ago

I have no idea if these fit the bill Rocket chat Mattermost Revolt

Mwa , 6 days ago

Seriously discord i was soo happy about the 25mb upload limit but there are better alternatives (lin.la pomf se,catbox)

ILikeBoobies , 6 days ago

Maybe they should just delete their data every month. Holding 1 20mb file or 2 10mb files aren’t much different

Resol , 6 days ago

I gotta admit, I have no problem with introducing a completely new feature and locking it to paying members. But taking away an already existing feature from non-members, or limiting it in some way, is simply outrageous. They could’ve kept the upload limit at 25MB, and increased it for Nitro users to something like an entire gigabyte. This would’ve encouraged people to get Nitro. But lowering the upload limit for free users would just encourage them to leave and find an alternative (and the problem is that there aren’t any viable ones because they aren’t used as much).

jetsetdorito , 6 days ago

the free upload limit was only recently bumped to 25mb, it used to be 8mb

Resol , 6 days ago

Heard that in a YouTube video.

This one in particular.

MerchantsOfMisery , 6 days ago

Exactly. And they didn’t even give the 25 MB limit to every user. Some users were always stuck at 8 MB, and others 25 MB. I’m the latter and I was blown away at the decision to cut the file size limit down to 1/3rd of what I was used to.

8mb.video

^ This website will compress videos down to 8 MB but the video quality ends up being awful, plus I’m not so sure how I feel about the privacy/security issues of uploading personal videos to some rando website so they can be compressed.

Resol , 6 days ago

I REALLY hate this “rolling out” of new features. Seriously, I hate it. I remember Instagram doing it when pressing the screen during Reels playback, on some accounts it pauses, on others it simply mutes the video.

Good riddance, Instagram.

werefreeatlast , 6 days ago

So email came before Google. Email was good. You went to your computer and downloaded your inbox. You could either delete the email from the server and have it in your computer only or keep it in both places. With android and Google, the strategy was to give you an address that you couldn’t take with you anywhere, and to let you see and accumulate emails from any device such that your data could be used for AI and you couldn’t easily retain it and still use it globally. You can come up with your own email server, just not a gmail.com address. They own you until you just start elsewhere.

Resol , 6 days ago

I mean, every giga company does this, and profits from it.

Can you tell I hate corporatism?

graphene , 7 days ago

They decreased it?? People always complain about max file sizes being too small.

Also, how is telegram able to offer 2 GB per file and 4 GB on premium? In comparison, that seems astronomical!

nossaquesapao , 6 days ago

I believe telegram manages that with severe upload and download speed limits, but Telegram has always been a bit shady, hasn’t it? Who knows how they financially support all that.

jenny_ball , 6 days ago

plus a fraction of the users of discord

joe_cool , 6 days ago

About 500MBit/s on Telegram Desktop. They currently have 10 million paying subscribers out of ~950 million users.

graphene , 5 days ago

Telegrams billionaire founder claims that he is bankrolling the thing with his personal wealth. I’m pretty sure he also claimed at one point that the average user cost them $6 per year, or something along those lines.

MerchantsOfMisery , 6 days ago

My guess is Telegram’s being bankrolled by entities that are willing to eat the cost of this kind of data usage.

pedz , 8 days ago

I am fortunate enough to know how to set up VMs and use Linux, so I run my own IRC server with a web interface (TheLounge). I can set the upload limit to what I want and settled for 100MB. This way my friends and I are not at the mercy of some proprietary software.

I do pay for a dedicated server that I also use to host my games’ servers and also a mumble server, but it’s so worth it, just to have control over our stuff.

Lettuceeatlettuce , 8 days ago

Discord’s enshitification continues.

rbesfe , 7 days ago

A smaller size limit on what amounts to free file hosting isn’t exactly enshittification. Servers and hard drives aren’t free.

Lettuceeatlettuce , 6 days ago

The process of enshitification is what I was referring to. Discord got super popular by providing users with lots of value for zero cost.

Now, in order to increase profits, they are reducing the scope of features they offer, and increasing the cost of the features that remain.

This will continue to slowly get worse, as users are more locked into Discord’s ecosystem and userbase, they will be further pressured to upgrade and pay more money for less stuff.

UltraGiGaGigantic , 6 days ago

Servers and hard drives aren’t free.

Uhoh, the widdle baby poopy pants corporation can’t handle doing their job. Maybe they can just get the fuck out of the way and let the real adults host our own shit?

MerchantsOfMisery , 8 days ago

If Discord was open source, I actually would not mind paying a fee for it. Fixed or reccurring, ideally the former. But that’s never happening. And forget buying that Nitro thing.

jetsetdorito , 6 days ago

revolt might catch up eventually

github.com/revoltchat

MerchantsOfMisery , 6 days ago

I hope you’re right.

UltraGiGaGigantic , 6 days ago

Revolt looks close, but it isn’t self hosted so it is worthless. Revolt will eventually become what discord is if it got big enough.

I am tired of changing services, I want off this clown carousel of:

new product - gains popularity - enshitification

dnzm , 5 days ago

Same here, so unless something is fully open source, self hostable and preferably federating, I’m not picking it up.

greatgizzards , 8 days ago

They want to start charging for the malware they host.

lud , 6 days ago

If you know of any malware hosted by them you should report it too them.

skullgiver , 8 days ago

They should’ve never increased the size to 25MB. Now everyone is mad they can’t upload files larger than 10MB, instead of being happy that Discord allows free file sharing up to 10MB.

That’s why you need to keep free product features and small and useless as possible; people will happily take improvements but complain to hell and back if you accidentally overcommit.

Meanwhile most Lemmy servers have an upload limit of what, a megabyte?

Daxtron2 , 7 days ago

Most Lemmy servers don’t relentlessly track and sell everything you do though. Discord makes way more money off your data than it costs them to host.

skullgiver , 7 days ago

Discord makes way more money off your data than it costs them to host

Lol. Your data is worth maybe $5, maybe $10 if you discuss financial platforms often, there’s no way that’ll cover the costs of hosting media for years. Just watching or hosting a video stream every month will probably run you over the money your data is worth. Individual data is practically worthless, and aggregate data doesn’t sell for a lot when you divide the total worth by the amount of users covered.

Discord is alive because of their premium subscription, their data sales are just a little bonus on top. Their own statistics claim 200 million active users per months with 600 million in revenue per year. Those $3 per user start to run real thin when you’re essentially running a free S3 server with 8MB blobs.

tyler , 7 days ago

Your data is worth about $5-$10 a month, at least for Facebook. A month.

skullgiver , 7 days ago

And they don’t sell to Facebook, nor does it sell any ads to advertisers willing to pay that rate, so that’s a rather useless statistic.

JameUwU , 7 days ago

The point was not the amount of money they are making, the point is that regardless you are being sold for profit. Any platform that is ad-driven should be avoided if you want any form of privacy.

skullgiver , 6 days ago

But Discord isn’t ad driven, it’s driven by their premium subscriptions and their weird store. I’m sure they sell message data to AI companies like every other messenger these days, but they’re not a messenger like Signal is; they’re a space to hang out and game.

If anything, the exclusive deals mean your community posts only make it to fewer AI services. Publicly accessible places like Lemmy are scraped to death and share all manner of user behaviour by design.

As long as you don’t try to replace Signal by Discord, I don’t really see the problem to be honest. I’d switch to Matrix once Element becomes faster and less buggy and has decent video streaming capabilities and some of Discord’s features, but with the way things are going that’ll take a couple of years.

JameUwU , 6 days ago

arstechnica.com/…/discord-starts-down-the-dangero…

They definitely sell user data. There is no doubt in my mind about it. I think the idea that Signal can’t be used in the same way is down to the marketing, especially sense Discord is now trying to transition away from gaming gamedeveloper.com/…/discord-is-pivoting-away-from…Signal literally has the same features + more than discord. You dont have to reveal your phone number to strangers anymore. Usernames are there. 1k+ member group chats EXIST. (I’m in one for fight for the future), screen sharing exists in calls. Theres no reason to need discord unless thats just where everyone else is.

skullgiver , 6 days ago

The ads Discord implements aren’t like the ads that track your every move online. This is basic product placement. I’m not even opposed to that as long as they keep it minimal and remove that shit from the paid subscriptions.

Signal doesn’t have anything close to the Discord experience. It lacks basic interaction patterns like channels. Voice calls work completely differently from a conversation standpoint. I don’t think Signal even implements threads, if it does I’ve never been able to find them. The UI for managing things like emotes/sticker packs is a lot better, especially for communities.

The there are the advanced features. Webhooks are used quite often for automation. Forums and discussion boards are used by larger communities. Roles and access control don’t exist in Signal because it doesn’t have a concept of communities.

Discord is much closer to Slack and Teams and Mattermost than it is to Signal and Telegram and WhatsApp and iMessage. On the protocol level, all of that could be implemented by exchanging special messages between devices, but the only app Signal devs want you to use contain none of that. Signal does have stuff Discord doesn’t have, such as encryption and cruptocurrency built in, but neither seem to be dealbreakers for everyone else.

You don’t need to use Discord, nor do you need to use Signal. I have Signal, but nobody else does. You don’t need to convince me, convince everyone else, because my Signal conversation list has been empty for months since I last reinstalled my custom ROM.

I’m sure Signal can be used in the same way as Discord, in the way you can technically run a copy of Microsoft Word on the PlayStation if you stack enough hacks on top of each other. For the vast majority of the user base, that’s not going to happen.

foremanguy92_ , 6 days ago

Discord is one of the worst company in term of privacy, they sell all of your datas, messages… First to make profit and then send it to the Chinese government. Thx to offer to me 10MB 😁

SSJMarx , 6 days ago

Why exactly do you believe the Chinese government wants the messages of non-Chinese citizens? Because Discord is blocked in China proper.

foremanguy92_ , 6 days ago

They want people datas as much as US wants them to do mass surveillance. Surveillance is power and all govs wants power

SSJMarx , 6 days ago

Power to do what, exactly? It’s not like China is going to get non-citizens extradited from their home country to punish them for saying bad things about the CPC. Believing in vague generalities doesn’t help anyone, you’ve got to be specific.

foremanguy92_ , 6 days ago

You should know that in this world most of the governments want to extand their “power” (in fact it’s the good world), by knowing all the stuffs that are happening in the world they gain some superior knowledge. Why do states are willing to do mass surveillance, to use security cameras, etc… It’s not to have more “citizens” but to gain more power

SSJMarx , 6 days ago

Yes, but as a specific exercise, the US government wants to spy on US citizens because if gives them the power to arrest you. You could be committing crimes right now and not realize it, but if you ever become a person of interest they will use them against you.

Of what use is specific data from specific nationals to a foreign government? They don’t have anywhere near the same level of power over your life as your home government does, all of that information is just fluff to them.

And not for nothing, but the original conversation was about Discord, which is partially owned by Tencent but partial ownership by a private Chinese firm does not give the Chinese government any kind of special control over the platform.

foremanguy92_ , 6 days ago

No no no, mass surveillance or global surveillance means a surveillance at the world scale meaning that all the people from everywhere would be watched. They just want to gain datas about everyone, to one day maybe use it. Cover leaks, cover several things… For sure today you will not be under the control of a foreign gov but tomorrow if they need to they could track you to achieve their goals.

With the case of Discord, you probably should know that in China the big companies are really related to the Chinese gov. Take the case of Tencent and search online for share owned by the gov. That’s all. Datas trough Discord are not safe at all.

dev_null , 6 days ago

Source that they make money off of uploaded files?

Daxtron2 , 6 days ago

Didn’t necessarily mean the files but the service as a whole

dev_null , 6 days ago

I agree, but the argument here is “why won’t they let you upload more data if they make money off of it”. My point is that it doesn’t apply here, because uploaded files is not the data that can make them money.

interdimensionalmeme , 6 days ago

Lemmy servers are radical open, everything short of your IP address is accessible over the activitypub protocol.

They’re not selling it, it’s free.

anas , 6 days ago

Is there finally a source that says Discord is selling your data?

PolandIsAStateOfMind , 8 days ago

Please discord die already

MerchantsOfMisery , 8 days ago (edited 8 days ago)

Until a viable alternative is presented, I doubt Discord will die anytime soon. Part of the problem is people have a hard time accepting that even if you make the best meal in town, you’ve gotta get people to step inside before they’ll try it. To an extent, this does involve winning a popularity contest of sorts if you want Discord to die.

I think often times folks are torn between enjoying a space/app as is, and making compromises to attract a larger group. IMO Linux has the same issue and that’s part of why die hard fanboys get so aggressively defensive when this is brought up.

It’s the software equivalent of being the bitter "nice guy" that simultaneously wants to attract a girlfriend (users) but is kind of an asshole to women. You might think you don’t stink but please wear deodorant.

PolandIsAStateOfMind , 7 days ago

Yeah i also don’t think it’s dying hence the plea. But thing is, i don’t want alternative. I want this shit to die so i never want to see “join our discord” spammed absolutely everywhere when i want to get some info on anything.

JameUwU , 7 days ago

There are viable alteratives, but they aren’t making money and can’t advertise. Signal is a prime example, its an amazing platform with feature parity + more to Discord. Regardless of how well a platform is polished, you need users. People will use the shittiest platform ever if it has users (Twitter and Reddit come to mind).

MerchantsOfMisery , 7 days ago

Signal isn’t an alternative to Discord. I use both and they’re used very differently. Group movie watching for example is pretty easy on Discord.

Digg had users and people jumped ship to Reddit because it was better.

JameUwU , 6 days ago

You can screen share on signal so that argument makes absolutely no sense. and people down voting me without explaining why are probably too stubborn to switch away from discord.

MerchantsOfMisery , 6 days ago

That’s a feature that was implemented what, 1 or 2 years ago when Signal’s been around for a decade?

You can’t possibly expect people to just jump from one social app to another that has such a relatively small user base and little familiarity. Entire Discord servers would have to jump ship and it would just be a nightmare for most people.

What Discord prioritizes, Signal treats as an afterthought. Things like group chat, video chat, GIF usage, etc, Signal has never really prioritized.

Discord’s mobile and PC apps both allow users to select GIFs within the application, whereas only Signal’s mobile app allows users to select GIFs within the application and Signal’s desktop app doesn’t allow for in-app GIF selection. If you’re reading this thinking "who tf cares about stupid stuff like that?", you’re completely missing the point because regular ass users care about stuff like that and they totally will say “fuck that” to an alternative if it doesn’t have features like this. Why doesn’t Signal incorporate in-app GIF selection for its desktop app? I’m sure it will be eventually implemented but dragging their heels like this for popular features and then having the nerve to ask "why aren’t people flocking to us instead of Discord/WhatsApp" is such an out of touch question to ask.

When open source developers ask for feedback from regular users and their response to said feedback is"ACKSHUALLY it’s your fault, not the application’s fault", as it often is, it’s no surprise that their software never gains traction. It’s like a guy who wears cargo pants to a formal affair and then gets into an argument over attire because in his mind, cargo pants = more pockets = superior, completely oblivious to every other factor.

Another thing-- Signal requires your phone number, Discord doesn’t. I know right away folks are going to rage about how Discord is the real privacy nightmare, not Signal. I don’t disagree, but the average user is just going to be more wary about being forced to give up their phone number in order to use Signal, even if the software now allows them to hide it.

JameUwU , 6 days ago

Phone number point is stupid to bring up because most public discord servers turn on the setting that prevents you from speaking until you’ve verified a phone number, and I’d trust signal with my number over discord any day of the week. I never said general users should jump ship, I said that the reason they DONT is because other platform dont have the advertising budget, nor the user base to make users jump ship. People act like they give a shit about features but as soon as they can only talk to their friends because they all left for one platform, even if its “worse” because of the feature set, they WILL follow or be left out. Its why I originally joined Discord, I didn’t want to leave Skype but thats where everyone was going. I am now taking the other side where I refuse to use discord. I use Signal and Matrix. if people want to talk to me, they talk to me on there or not at all, and ykno what. Ive gotten 20+ people to switch.

MerchantsOfMisery , 6 days ago

Discord doesn’t require a phone number to use it and there’s tons of servers that don’t require phone number verification. The vast majority of servers I’m in have no phone number requirement. Signal straight will not work without your phone number, in any capacity. I’m sure you’d trust Signal over Discord with your phone number any day of the week but as I said, that’s an irrelevant point because we’re talking about why people are more attracted to Discord over Signal. Slacks vs ugly cargo pants.

I said that the reason they DONT is because other platform dont have the advertising budget, nor the user base to make users jump ship.

Have you ever seen an ad for Discord? I haven’t see one before and I only know about it through word of mouth. There’s nothing stopping people from creating Signal groups for various hobbies and including a Signal link in their social media page.

Refusing to use Discord might be noble from a privacy/security point of view but from a broader perspective, you’re significantly limiting your social interactions and not because of the people but the app the people are using to communicate with. It’s like not using a phone at all because pretty much any phone is a privacy/security issue.

JameUwU , 6 days ago

I use CalyxOS and keep airplane mode on when I’m not expecting any calls over the celluar network 🤷‍♂️ I suppose youre right that Ive never seen an ad for Discord, I also just haven’t seen ads in well over 5 years. I did assume they advertised so if Im wrong thats on me. I refuse to be a product and feel others should as well. If people want to sell themselves in exchange for a money-less service I suppose thats their own decision.

NostraDavid , 6 days ago

people jumped ship to Reddit because it was better.

People jumped ship because Digg turned into complete and utter garbage, and Reddit wasn’t completely awful. It was a weird site though, 100%.

Digg would’ve been fine had they not forced Digg v4 on users.

NostraDavid , 7 days ago

What’s a good voice-chat alternative then?

PolandIsAStateOfMind , 6 days ago

Before the discord plague i used Team Speak, it was sufficient.

Jyek , 6 days ago

TS has always, and I do mean always, been garbage.

PolandIsAStateOfMind , 6 days ago

No. I mean if you spend your entire life jumping between 30 rooms full of people then perhaps, but for just normal voice communication for meeting, gaming or RPG it was entirely sufficient.

dev_null , 6 days ago

I already use a different app for voice chat, and never used Discord’s voice chat feature.

Discord is a modern alternative to IRC, Slack, or a more fully featured version of Matrix. I never considered it for the voice chat feature.

People always bring up voice chat alternatives, which don’t replace Discord at all, because voice chat is a tiny unimportant feature of Discord that I wouldn’t notice if they removed.

Jessica , 8 days ago

Well that didn’t last very long. It was 8 MB for like six years and then it just went to 25 MB maybe a year ago and now we’re back down to 10 MB.

I’m surprised they aren’t offsetting the cost by selling all our data to language learning models like everyone else is

30p87 , 8 days ago

And standard screenshots of my desktop are ~30mb, I was lucky to upload it lol

B0rax , 8 days ago

What format are you saving them in? BMP? Try png.

30p87 , 8 days ago

I am using png. Level 0 compression tho and in 4k (38402160), sometimes even 4k + 21440p (2560*1440), but it’s already too large with just my main 4k monitor.

tetris11 , 8 days ago

PNG started out as ZIP(BMP) and hasn’t gotten that much better. Use JPEG. The pixels you lose are not worth crying about

lemmyingly , 8 days ago

Or they could just compression for their PNGs. PNG is a lossless format so they’ll only lose a fraction of a second during creation.

B0rax , 8 days ago

JPEG for graphics like screenshots is not very efficient. For stuff like that, png is simply superior. (But not with compression 0)

PNG is not good for photos though.

tetris11 , 8 days ago

why though? The graphics represented in the screen are already squashed and scaled, so you wouldn’t be preserving their quality in any case. If you’re worried about text, JPEG should still be able to handle it under high quality settings

B0rax , 8 days ago

We can ask the same the other way around: why do you want to use jpg if it results in a bigger size and worse quality than png?

tetris11 , 8 days ago

But that’s patently untrue: take this 10 MB example TIFF file as an example.

• PNG Compression, max compress (=quality 9):

  
  <span style="color:#323232;">convert file_example_TIFF_10MB.tiff -quality 9 test.png
  </span>
  

• JPG Encoding, 99% quality (=quality 99):

  
  <span style="color:#323232;">convert file_example_TIFF_10MB.tiff -quality 99 test.jpg
  </span>
  

Final file size comparison:

<span style="color:#323232;">9.7M Sep  5 13:21 file_example_TIFF_10MB.tiff
</span><span style="color:#323232;">1.7M Sep  5 13:22 test.jpg
</span><span style="color:#323232;">2.5M Sep  5 13:22 test.png
</span>

PNG is significantly larger, and difference in quality between them is negligible

B0rax , 8 days ago

Dude. Did you even read what I wrote? PNG is bad for photos. Your example is a photo. Go ahead and try the same with a screenshot with text and menus showing.

ms_lane , 8 days ago

png - jpg

<span style="color:#323232;">156K Sep  5 23:06 Screenshot_20240905_230459.jpg
</span><span style="color:#323232;">137K Sep  5 23:05 Screenshot_20240905_230459.png
</span>

jpg with 80% compression, via krita.

As B0rax said, for screenshots, png is better - it can represent line graphics and text more efficiently.

tetris11 , 8 days ago

Thanks for this. Still, I would be curious to see this for a 4K level image. Also I wonder if your screenshot tool did a bitmap copy of the screen or intrinsically converted it to PNG first before pasting it into your paint editor.

30p87 , 8 days ago

I use 4k because I like seeing a lot of stuff at the same time in good quality.
I make screenshots of my whole screen to share all the stuff in the highest detail.
Using jpeg would result in literally unreadable pictures.

VOwOxel , 8 days ago

Depends on the Quality setting and version of jpeg. Even the original jpeg, on high quality, will result in little to no data loss. IIRC, Jpeg can even do lossless, with the only caveat being that it doesn’t save alpha channels (but screenshots don’t need to have transparency, anyway). Newer versions of jpeg, such as jpeg-2000 (and the much less broadly supported jpeg-XL) have much better compression and provide higher image quality at lower file size.

“jpegification” or “Deep-frying” only really occurs with the original jpeg at low quality settings.

B0rax , 8 days ago

Why 0 compression?

30p87 , 8 days ago

Because it was never a problem. It’s a little bit faster for encoding and decoding, and no service ever had problems with the file size. Especially not my selfhosted stuff. Every service, except discord. As I now have resorted to using Vencord or just uploading most media to Nextcloud, I don’t have that many issues with it anymore, anyway.

brb , 8 days ago

How does Vencord help with the upload limit?

nekusoul , 8 days ago

It’s a little bit faster for encoding and decoding

On the other hand, the time spent uploading/downloading much smaller files probably more than makes up for that, although even that difference might get pretty small with modern internet connections.

30p87 , 8 days ago

Especially in times where using WiFi is faster than ethernet, because my network ports are only gigabit.

ayyy , 7 days ago

Because it was never a problem.

But you literally started this thread because it’s a problem. And then you spent more time defending your bad choice on a Lemmy discussion than you will ever save in your entire life decompressing PNGs.

JackbyDev , 8 days ago

You know PNG is lossless compression right?

30p87 , 8 days ago (edited 7 days ago)

Yes. But in theory it’s still a performance hit, and as I have enough local storage (and typically use services with high limits), and I’m too lazy to change grims config just for discord, I never changed it and used Vencord instead.

JackbyDev , 7 days ago

Why do you think it’s a performance hit?

30p87 , 7 days ago

Because even though it saves over 29 MB, it also takes more than 20 times as long. And that’s just on my laptop, 1920x1080 + 2*1680x1050. On my PC it’s even worse. https://feddit.org/pictrs/image/c65c83b8-4d4e-4d5a-bbee-4790b4f8e636.png

I have thousands of GB of high speed storage, Gigabit internet, but only a Ryzen 5 2600 and a i5-1145G7.

JackbyDev , 7 days ago

What about compression level 1 instead of 9?

ReversalHatchery , 8 days ago

I’m surprised they aren’t offsetting the cost by selling all our data to language learning models like everyone else is

aren’t they doing it? but at least by looking at how much they like locking out people until they give out their phone number, I suspect they are not collecting it without having further use for it

tetris11 , 8 days ago (edited 7 days ago)

I’m surprised they aren’t offsetting the cost by selling all our data to language learning models like everyone else is

Hah. Hahaha. Hahahahahahaahahahahahaha. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Jessica , 7 days ago

Just to be clear, I 100% think they are selling our data. What I meant was I’m surprised they’re concerned about the size of the uploads when they could just be selling the uploaded data.

tetris11 , 7 days ago

Good point. Harder to parse would be my guess

poke , 7 days ago

For the record, they still claim that they do not sell user information nor data.

y0kai , 7 days ago

Giving it to China for free isn’t selling. Its just called “investor relations”

dev_null , 6 days ago

Any proof, or just tinfoil?

y0kai , 6 days ago

I simply don’t trust any company that provides a “free” service and is owned by Tencent, who has a 35% stake in Discord.

dev_null , 6 days ago

Neither do I, which is why I would love evidence to confirm my suspicions, so I can show it to others.

But I also try not to make claims that are merely suspicious, however likely.

x00za , 8 days ago

Look up the Discord Summaries BETA.

They already have “AI” monitoring all chats.

It would be “stupid” of them to not abuse that. (Unmorally stupid that is)

BlastboomStrice , 7 days ago

Wait, I ~never was notified that it got to 25mb, I thought it was 8

Jessica , 7 days ago

It might have only even been like six months. It was in the little change log pop up during one of the updates at some point

gencha , 7 days ago

They increased to 25 to encourage media uploads to train their own models with. They now have collected enough metrics to realize, most valuable content is below 10MB. Now they are optimizing. They won’t lose anything valuable to them and the users who are impacted might even buy Nitro now. Win-win for them

lud , 6 days ago

It would be legally stupid for them to abuse that.

gencha , 6 days ago

discord.com/terms#5 is pretty permissive

Your content is yours, but you give us a license to it when you use Discord. Your content may be protected by certain intellectual property rights. We don’t own those. But by using our services, you grant us a license—which is a form of permission—to do the following with your content, in accordance with applicable legal requirements, in connection with operating, developing, and improving our services:

<span style="color:#323232;">Use, copy, store, distribute, and communicate your content in manners consistent with your use of the services. (For example, so we can store and display your content.)
</span><span style="color:#323232;">Publish, publicly perform, or publicly display your content if you’ve chosen to make it visible to others. (For example, so we can display your messages if you post them in certain servers or recommend that content to others.)
</span><span style="color:#323232;">Monitor, modify, translate, and reformat your content. (For example, so we can resize an image you post to fit on a mobile device.)
</span><span style="color:#323232;">Sublicense your content, to allow our services to work as intended. (For example, so we can store your content with our cloud service providers.)
</span>

y0kai , 7 days ago

“by selling all our data to language learning models like everyone else is”

I imagine China is using it for free since Tencent owns a 38% stake.