There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

quixotic120 ,

This exists, kind of

There’s bonded connections in several senses

Bonded ports but this doesn’t increase throughput in the way you’re thinking. eg if I bond 2 1 gigabit Ethernet ports I can’t connect at 2 gigabits, I can connect 2 users at up to one gigabit each (or several users totaling 2 gigabits but no 1 user at more than 1 gigabit)

bonding routers can take two internet connections and combine them, which is closer to what you are probably imagining. They combine throughput, eg a 100mbit connection and a 100mbit connection become a 200mbit connection although realistically it’s not that perfect and you have to get the right services for it, not just any connection will work, it’s a rabbit hole and generally much slower and worse latency than if you just got a traditional connection. Think people using starlink and 5g internet in rural settings

There’s also something called speedify, which is software that claims to do the above in software alone, bonds two connections to combine throughput. Never tried it, reviews are mixed. Some say it works, some say it’s spotty, some say you only get the speed of the one connection, etc.

LambdaRX ,
@LambdaRX@sh.itjust.works avatar

Just duckduckgo/mojeek your question. I got link to speedify for example.

SpaceNoodle ,

You mean “Bing it”

LambdaRX ,
@LambdaRX@sh.itjust.works avatar

If you mean that these search engines use Bing, than this is true only for DDG. Mojeek is independent.

WhyAUsername_1 ,

Could you be any more wrong?

sexy_peach ,
@sexy_peach@feddit.org avatar

Because it’s not useful. Two routers still share the same frequencies and thus can’t send more data over the same air. A single router can already use multiple frequencies to increase throughput. You don’t need two to do that. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIMO

sexy_peach ,
@sexy_peach@feddit.org avatar

If you want to use multiple internet connections and combine their speed, that’s possible. Dunno how though and I guess to work best it would need a server somewhere else like a VPN to manage the packets coming from different ips

slazer2au ,

Software defined wan (SDWAN) is the industry term for bundling multiple independent internet connections to maximise bandwidth.

discozombie ,

SD-WAN includes that but it is not its sole purpose, although I agree most vendors will say that’s what you want. WAN/Link Aggregation, Multilink Aggregation, Link Load Balancing, Equal Cost Multipath, WAN Virtualisation, etc are ways to bundle multiple links together.

In WIFI terms, it’s called channel bonding, it was proprietary and various vendors had their own implementations, see “Super G”.

slazer2au ,

I agree but most of the wan optimisers have rebranded to SDWAN because that was the hype about 7 years ago.

With wifi specifically yea, trying to multiplex a technology that is effectively a CSMA/CA is hard and there is no interoperability.

boredsquirrel ,
@boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net avatar

Can you explain what this “software defined x” means that you hear everywhere?

acosmichippo ,
@acosmichippo@lemmy.world avatar

probably because it’s more complicated than just improving the bandwidth on single wifi networks, which we have been making steady progress on. picking the low hanging fruit first.

LodeMike ,

We’ve been doing better time sharing since WiFi 6. Remember this all has to be backwards compatible.

WiFi 7 has its own new band and its really fast.

MHanak ,

My guess is that a network card can handle only one network at a time

Boomkop3 ,

We had a guest speaker from ericson back when I was in uni. According to them that’s been a thing for a while now

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines