There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

programmer_humor

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

PipedLinkBot , in Biology doesn't care about your feelings

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

piped.video/watch?v=TiwZip-7TuA

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.

Ebsku , in Imagine

Don’t give Microsoft ideas

gravediggersbiscuit , in I think I'm switching, I like the new UI

Excuse me, do you have a moment to talk about our lord and saviour Vim?

sturmblast , in They tried

dumbest shit ever

milkjug , in Thought I would share my success
@milkjug@lemmy.world avatar

On StackOverflow: “never mind, figured it out.”

fkn OP ,

Hey, I marked only one jira with “Works as intended” for only one of the big reports related to it, thank you very much.

RagingNerdoholic , in They tried

Road to hell, good intentions and all that. Government fundamentally misunderstanding the role of cookies and the fact that browsers can handle user privacy with trivial effort by default rather than having every single website annoy the fuck out of you with a million goddamn notifications before actually showing you what you want to see.

kornel ,

The annoying popups are an act of malicious compliance from data harvesting companies. The tracking industry wants people to associate the right to privacy with stupid annoyance, so that people will stop demanding privacy.

The legislation does not say anything about cookies. It’s about rights and responsibilities in data collection (no matter how it’s done technically). The “consent” part of it exists as a compromise, because there has been heavy lobbying against the legislation.

This is not a technical problem — we’ve had many technologies for it, and the industry has sabotaged all of them. There was the P3P spec in 2002! It has been implemented in IE that had 90%+ market share back then. And Google has been actively exploiting a loophole in IE’s implementation to bypass it and have unlimited tracking. Google has paid fines for actively subverting Safari’s early anti-tracking measures. Then browsers tried DNT spec as the simplest possible opt-out, and even that has been totally rejected by the data harvesting industry. There are easy technical solutions, but there are also literally trillions of dollars at stake, and ad companies will viciously sabotage all of it.

stevedidWHAT ,
@stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world avatar

Well said, appreciate the write up ☺️

wisplike_sustainer , in They tried

Like I care. I’ve got a plugin that automatically accepts all cookies, and another one that deletes cookies when I leave the page.

SSUPII ,

By accepting everything, you are also sending most of the time extra data to third parties. What you are doing is ill-advised if you care about privacy.

mojo ,

Not really. If you’re using an adblocker, it’s the best option. It’s the path of least resistance, and tracking is blocked regardless if it’s tracked it not. No server will see if you pressed accept or decline. That’s why this addon exists.

Honytawk ,

Just because your browser doesn’t show ads doesn’t mean you don’t get profiled.

mojo ,

Yes it does. Open up your adblocker to see the tracker domains blocked.

dan1101 ,

How does that work though? The cookies are presumably based on things like your IP and browser metrics, which a site gets from your browser. If your browser throws away the cookies then on your next visit you aren’t volunteering that you’ve been there before. But the site can still likely figure it out, but without the cookies it isn’t as certain. With well-constructed cookies they can be almost 100% sure you’re the same visitor.

towerful ,

Cookie consent is actually supposed to be about all data tracking.
There are quite a few analytics that do fingerprinting “because it’s not a cookie, it’s not covered by Cookie Consent”. But it is still covered.
Some of them respect the fact that declining cookies is about declining tracking.

So, if you consent to all cookies, you are also consenting to any fingerprinting that doesn’t rely on cookies. So deleting cookies wouldn’t remove that fingerprinting data.

dan1101 ,

Gotcha, responsible site owners should not be tracking you if you decline cookies.

DerpyPlayz18 ,

Wait doesn’t it automatically deny them?

filcuk ,

The above is wrong, the add on attempts to hide the prompt. It doesn’t accept nor reject it.

wisplike_sustainer ,

I Still don’t care about cookies? From its description:

In most cases, the add-on just blocks or hides cookie related pop-ups. When it’s needed for the website to work properly, it will automatically accept the cookie policy for you (sometimes it will accept all and sometimes only necessary cookie categories, depending on what’s easier to do).

So, yeah, doesn’t accept everything, but might accept some.

Knusper ,

The “I still don’t care about Cookies” extension does not, no.

This extension can do that: addons.mozilla.org/firefox/…/consent-o-matic/

However, since many webpages have illegally made it so refusing consent is more difficult than giving ‘consent’, that extension is significantly more complex and in my experience doesn’t work as reliably, unfortunately.

brb ,

Is there any extension for android that can do that?

Knusper ,

Well, you can install both of these add-ons via this workaround: blog.mozilla.org/…/expanded-extension-support-in-…
(I have used both. Both work. Although, again, I’d rather recommend I Still Don’t Care About Cookies + Cookie Auto-Delete.)

However, Mozilla plans to make much more extensions available for Android soon, so you might see these regularly available before the end of the year. This is what we know for now: blog.mozilla.org/…/prepare-your-firefox-desktop-e…

Honytawk ,

Yeah, sometimes websites have so many hidden checkboxes, that consent-o-matic has a rough time going through all of them. Takes like 10-20 seconds to disable them all at computerized speed.

Imagine doing it by hand, lol.

Honytawk ,

Better to use consent-o-matic, which blocks all possible cookies instead of accepting them.

The websites still work perfectly anyway, it only preserves your privacy.

OsrsNeedsF2P , in Wow, what a comp for doing free consulting work ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

With the way SO treats their mods, I’m very much looking forwards to an alternative pick up

ShittyRedditWasBetter , in Zero to Hero in 1 hour

K8s basics isn’t that hard, but it builds on quite a bit of knowledge. And running anything of complexity to multiple nodes is going to take at least some intermediate tuning to get your app stable.

This is fantastic though.

darcy , in I finally created the perfect JavaScript runtime: No-JS
@darcy@sh.itjust.works avatar

amazing.

MooseBoys , in This one goes out to the sysadmins in the crowd.

What kind of apps are we talking about here?

WhiskyTangoFoxtrot ,

Major ones.

Haus , in Haskell researchers announce new discovery
@Haus@kbin.social avatar

In related news, Mrs. Cleaver is looking particularly lovely today.

n3m37h , in I know, I know, but this revision compiles

We don’t call them idiots guides for no reason!

JockerBlack , in Its not wrong though

Open source code refers to the comments and the documentation.

ares35 ,
@ares35@kbin.social avatar

so, like half (more?) of current 'open source' isn't, then? because it lacks in one or the other.. or both?

charonn0 , in You can never really trust someone to turn off the remote desktop connection
@charonn0@startrek.website avatar

How did you get in here?!

I. Am. Koloth.

That doesn’t answer my question.

Yes. It. Does.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines