There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

X, Owned by Elon Musk, Brings Antitrust Suit Accusing Advertisers of a Boycott

The company claimed that members of the Global Alliance for Responsible Media coordinated to dissuade brands from advertising on X.

X filed a lawsuit on Tuesday against the Global Alliance for Responsible Media, a coalition of major advertisers, claiming that it had violated antitrust laws by coordinating with brands to dissuade them from spending money on the social media platform.

The suit, filed in federal court in Texas, claims that the coalition, known as GARM, “conspired” with leading brands, including CVS, Unilever, Mars and the Danish energy company Orsted, to “collectively withhold billions of dollars in advertising revenue” that were owed to X, then known as Twitter, in the wake of Elon Musk’s takeover of the social media company in 2022.

With the lawsuit, X effectively declared war on advertisers, which provide the bulk of the social media company’s revenue. Since Mr. Musk acquired the company and promised to usher in a new era of unfettered free speech, many advertisers have limited their spending on X, concerned by reports of rising hate speech and misinformation there. By pursuing legal action against GARM, Mr. Musk continued to break with the leaders of other social media companies, who have forged close relationships with advertisers and been responsive to their concerns about offensive online content.

KijinSeija ,

“We want a free market!”

“Wait, not like that”

Agent641 ,

“Free to me, not free to them!”

DogPeePoo ,

What a dumb dumb.

Act like a racist, win racist prizes.

Reverendender ,

I gotta think he is represented by Bob Loblaw

lewdian69 ,

Bob Loblaw wouldn’t take this case. I’m not even sure Barry would touch it.
No touching!

2ugly2live ,
@2ugly2live@lemmy.world avatar

I’m super confused. How can you sue people for not using your service??? If that was true, they wouldn’t have had to shoot MLK, they would have just sued him into the ground.

CileTheSane ,
@CileTheSane@lemmy.ca avatar

I’m going to sue X for not advertising on my platform. It’s just $1000 a week for a sign on my fridge, my entire family will see it daily!

CileTheSane ,
@CileTheSane@lemmy.ca avatar

By pursuing legal action against GARM, Mr. Musk continued to break with the leaders of other social media companies, who have forged close relationships with advertisers and been responsive to their concerns about offensive online content.

This is the most journalist way of saying “This guy is a fucking idiot.”

andallthat ,

laugh all you want, but YOU are next, former Twitter users who refused to pay for their blue badge and had the gall to move to Mastodon or others!

CileTheSane ,
@CileTheSane@lemmy.ca avatar

Can’t they just bring in a video of him telling advertisers to “go fuck yourself” and get this thrown out? Or would that just add Musk as a co-defendant?

AlexanderESmith ,

This shit sounds like flavor text on an item in a post-dystopian futuristic video have (the first Horizon game's news clips come to mind)

MediaBiasFactChecker Bot ,

New York Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for New York Times:
> MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
> Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/06/technology/x-antitrust-suit-advertisers-elon-musk.html

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

projectsquared ,

Dude looks like a taller Syndrome from the first Incredible movie.

Feathercrown ,

LOL

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines