There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

House Democrat is proposing a constitutional amendment to reverse Supreme Court's immunity decision

A leading House Democrat is preparing a constitutional amendment in response to the Supreme Court’s landmark immunity ruling, seeking to reverse the decision “and ensure that no president is above the law.”

Rep. Joseph Morelle of New York, the top Democrat on the House Administration Committee, sent a letter to colleagues informing them of his intent to file the resolution, which would kickstart what’s traditionally a cumbersome amendment process.

“This amendment will do what SCOTUS failed to do — prioritize our democracy,” Morelle said in a statement to AP.

It’s the most significant legislative response yet to the decision this week from the court’s conservative majority, which stunned Washington and drew a sharp dissent from the court’s liberal justices warning of the perils to democracy, particularly as Trump seeks a return to the White House. Still, the effort stands almost no chance of succeeding in this Congress.

machinin ,

Do this in tandem with Biden taking full advantage of the current immunity to utterly destroy the Trump campaign since it is a threat to democracy. We’ll get that amendment passed in no time.

demizerone ,

And throw the corrupt justices in jail.

JasonDJ ,

The only way to destroy Trump is through a long series of viral propaganda documentaries.

Not good ones. Shittily produced ones that get hosted on Vimeo.

wanderingmagus ,

Or just order the assassination of Trump and anyone that supports him without trial, in the name of “national security”. Immunity, official act, etc. See how fast the justices rescind their ruling.

fubarx ,

Say this gets passed, and it’s signed. Forget the higher bar for an amendment. It will get challenged and end up in front of the very same court.

The system has an inherent flaw that was not anticipated by the Founders. Smart, legal people need to get into 4D puzzle-solving mode.

Eezyville ,
@Eezyville@sh.itjust.works avatar

This isn’t a law that has to be signed but a constitutional amendment that has to be ratified by a certain number of states.

jordanlund ,
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

House Democrat… Great, so it’s dead on arrival then.

Republicans control the House and they will never allow a vote on this.

pineapple_pizza ,

Unless maybe biden threatens to use his immunity

dodgy_bagel ,

Maybe my pig will shit out a gold nugget.

Minarble ,

How do you know it hasn’t? You’d better go check.

Wrench ,

It puts a magnifying glass on the people obstructing the fight against blatant corruption. Which is a good start, and really the only thing that can be done with a simple majority.

Biden could also just start assassinating the nay sayers until the point gets through, too.

jordanlund ,
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

It does nothing, same as the votes against the Trump impeachments. “Do they have an ® by their name?” Really all you need to know.

Wrench ,

Well, Option B is looking good still.

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

As I was going to say- good luck with that one.

NoSuchAgency ,

For years the Supreme Court had a liberal majority and now that they don’t, they claim every decision they make is the end of the world and they want to lock everyone up and stack the courts. This is just more of the same

ampersandrew ,
@ampersandrew@lemmy.world avatar

They just made bribes legal and made the president above the law.

mashbooq ,

Because the liberal Supreme Court largely supported democracy, while the conservative one isn’t even trying to hide its promotion of fascism. There is no both sides here

Empricorn , (edited )

Reversing decades of settled law in multiple rulings is not “more of the same”. Lie to yourself, don’t lie to those of us with open eyes.

Cornelius_Wangenheim ,

The Supreme Court hasn’t had a liberal majority since the 80s. The difference is that until the Trump appointments, the nakedly partisan political hacks were a minority on the court.

ChrisMcMillan ,

This is the way.

Fedizen ,

this is a gimme. You show you’re willing to pass laws to reign them in.

someguy3 ,

Yup this is the way to do it too. It needs to be part of the Constitution to override this “interpretation”.

dhork ,

Yay! I will have a garbage plate in Joe Morelle’s honor the next time I am in Rochester.

(Although I do admit, I was probably gonna order the plate regardless)

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines