There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

ToucheGoodSir ,

Well, they’re not going to enjoy jail with their corrupted views. Not in MY fucking America. Sooooo…

Don’t fuck around and find out. Shut the fuck up you uneducated children.

abcnews.go.com/US/…/story?id=99506592

shalafi ,

He would have been hung 200-years ago.

TheFlopster ,
@TheFlopster@lemmy.world avatar

*hanged

Pictures are hung; people are hanged. English, man. It’s weird.

Velonie ,

People can be hung too, but uh… it has a different meaning

jeffw OP ,
@jeffw@lemmy.world avatar

In case you don’t get it, just go to google images and type in “John Holmes”

thefartographer ,

What does Mark Wahlberg’s penis have to do with anything?

Viking_Hippie ,

Presumably not much, unless you’re Rhea Durham 🤷

disguy_ovahea ,

That was a prosthetic.

thefartographer , (edited )

Yes, but asking “What does Mark Wahlberg’s fake penis have to do with anything” would let readers know that I’m in on the joke, thus ruining the comedy.

You see, in this example, I’m playing the archetype of the buffoon in which I’m feigning dual confusion: first that John Holmes was a fictional character portrayed by Mark Wahlberg, and second that I believed Mark Wahlberg’s penis in the movie Boogie Nights was real.

Had I used a descriptor noting that Mark Wahlberg’s penis was a prosthetic, I’d be showing more intimate knowledge of the film Boogie Nights, from which one could more easily assume that I also know that John Holmes and Mark Wahlberg are, in fact, two different people.

Perhaps I could have said something like “prosthetic pp” which would have the comedic values of alliteration and immaturity. Certainly, that could have evoked a positive response from viewers, but the role of the buffoon is often not completed until compared to a more anchored character. “Prosthetic pp” would have made my delivery both the comment and the punchline, but by portraying the role of the buffoon and simply referencing “Mark Wahlberg’s penis,” I left the dialog open for someone else to provide comedic input by responding. This means that I not only get to share the limelight with another user, but that readers get to enjoy even more humor by reading the next comment.

For example, @Viking_Hippie chose to put a button on the joke by referencing Mark Wahlberg’s wife, Rhea Durham. This humorous comment could be seen as the final note in our humorous exchange, which began with a humorous retort by @Velonie to @TheFlopster correction of @shalafi common misuse of the word “hung” instead of “hanged.” Although, Viking’s response also left things somewhat open-ended by saying “presumably” and using a shrug emoji; this opening means someone could continue the humor, such as using a classic improv response format of “yes and.” Perhaps another user would like to reply to Viking with something like “presumably nothing, gimme that fat dick!”

Referring back to the archetypes of comedy, you can see how your response would most likely fall under that of the anchor, the neurotic, or the cynic. In this scenario, you’re probably playing the role of the neurotic or the cynic as @FlyingSquid anecdotally mentioned his father, making him either the anchor or the innocent.

You’ll note that this current response to your comment is unlikely to be found on the archetypes of comedy list because I’m currently breaking the fourth wall and am just an asshole. If you’ve read this far, I’m sorry.

disguy_ovahea ,

Except you didn’t write Mark Wahlberg’s fake penis, or Eddie Adams/Dirk Digler’s penis. You wrote Mark Wahlberg’s penis.

In contrast, John Holmes was a porn star who was famously well-endowed.

thefartographer ,

FUCK! Good catch! I totally forgot that Mark Wahlberg’s character was only inspired by John Holmes. You absolutely win.

I’d offer you a victory prize such as my last shred of dignity, but I think I lost that in my previous comment.

Damn, you’re good, great job!

disguy_ovahea ,

I wasn’t trying to win. I’m sorry for sucking the fun out of the joke getting hung up on details. I didn’t know Dirk Digler was based on John Holmes, so thanks for teaching me something new!

Viking_Hippie ,

Perhaps another user would like to reply to Viking with something like “presumably nothing, gimme that fat dick!”

If I had a dollar for every time people have said those exact words to me…I’d obviously still be broke.

thefartographer ,

Yes, but you’d be a few bucks richer and your obese friend, Richard, would have worsened insecurities!

Poor Fat Dick… 😔

ShepherdPie ,

10/10 response to being asked to explain a joke. Somehow you made the joke explanation even funnier than the original joke.

techt , (edited )

If you put someone on a wall hook, would they then have been hung? Likewise if I suspend my painting with a noose, has the painting been hanged?

Papergeist ,

Perhaps. Would it count as crucifixion?

thefartographer ,

Jesus!

I mean, my god!

Wait… Whatever, what a bleak response!

dogslayeggs ,

quickmeme.com/…/bc2ffd9292ee58f2fb44eda95843e5e27…

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

My father loved that expression.

BeardedBlaze ,
@BeardedBlaze@lemmy.world avatar

Since we’re being pedantic, people can be hung or hanged. The letter requires the result of the action to be death.

LodeMike ,

Actually, they’re referring to his penis (it is very small)

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •