But if the claim is about the Palestinians overall how could you not include them? “Palestinians” includes them too.
Despite all the ongoing killing in the West Bank, they don’t have a political cover to kill in the West Bank in the way they do in Gaza. So they can’t really do that either, because they are “protected” in the same way because there is zero justification for a bombing campaign in that case. America and others would certainly take issue. Maybe a security council vote would actually pass.
So I would say it’s much more reasonable to focus on the percentage of those actually at risk of large-scale killing.