I strongly suspect that you are fishing for a specific response, which you find absurd despite ultimately accepting all the premises.
I’m not. I thought you were pretty clear, but I wanted to check. I’m sort of exploring what you believe, rather than fishing for anything in particular.
So, in your view, if a building were burning, and inside was an artificial womb of some sort with twenty viable eggs that will eventually become people, then would there be a moral duty to save them over one five-year-old child?
presupposing that bodily autonomy is morally relevant