He may be wrong in a structural sense, but he is making a valid point in a how things really work sense. The phrase "legislate from the bench" was coined for a reason. The concept of judgement notwithstanding the verdict grants some of that power to lower courts. It shouldn't be like that, but it is.
I think it would be nice to have a rule that reminds people to post for a global audience. This community tends toward news that is only relevant to people in the United States. I believe that having active moderation effort to encourage more non-US-centric content would be good for the community.
I agree that this sub can be very US-centric at times, but I feel like that is a product of people’s interests. Wouldn’t it be a little bit misplaced to put a “rule” to restrict the amount of US content / encourage non-US-centric content? I’m not sure, so I’ll need some further input on that (:
Agreed. I mean, since lemmy.world/c/world already restricts itself to non-US news, /c/news seems to be the next largest logical community where both US and non-US news can be posted together. For a similar comparison, I appreciate r/news’ description: “The place for news articles about current events in the United States and the rest of the world.”
And here we see the continued shift away from China. They just aren’t as price competitive as they used to be, their horrid demographics make them a terrible long-term investment, and there is always the off possibility they decide to invade Taiwan and any investments in the country just poof.
I wouldn’t call this a shift. 400 millions is not that much in this industry.
There has been a wave of diversification, but it mostly has to do with security implications and political pressure. So far none of the new investments are for anything top of the line so Taiwan still has monopoly on top-line production.
news
Top
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.