Crime stats are easy to juke. I haven’t dived into these numbers. Got a degree in criminology though, heavy focus on stats and program evaluation.
I note that the largest social and economic disruption in US history began three years ago and obviously crime was gonna go up after that. I find it more useful to compare present stats to early to pre-2020 numbers. And generally, I’m just not impressed by slight increases with an obvious cause. Especially when they are offered as evidence by people with no sincere interest in reducing crime, such as people advocating for more police, more prisons, three strikes laws, mandatory minimums, truth in sentencing laws, asset forfeiture, disenfranchisement, incarceration cost restitution, or other such “tough on crime” “law and order” bullshit, which obviously cause more poverty and familial and community instability, and thereby serve only to cause more crime. Anyway that’s my rant.
My immediate question is: what warrant in the first place?
I thought the county records office said no warrant or other reports from the magistrate had been filed there, meaning everything done by the police and others was illegal.
They had the warrant, and the paper got a copy of it in the original search. What they couldn't "find" was the sworn affidavit that listed the facts that gave enough probable cause for the search warrant. Except that it turns out that they have "found" it - except it's essentially just a copy-and-paste if the search warrant itself, which is undoubtedly why they're asking for it to be pulled.
However, I have every faith that in the five days they've had the computers, that the police chief has gone through them and gotten the identities of the multiple people who were reporting sexual assault allegations against him.
Oh, and the bar owner got her liquor license approved, so she can make a lot more money now. Which means that the hotel her restaurant is in can raise her rent, which is nice for the hotel owner. And the hotel owner just ever so casually happens to be the District Attorney ....
a man came into their front yard while she was making TikToks outside while her uncle and sibling were inside and assaulted her. Ashley said she did not know who the man was and that no one witnessed the attack.
Really now? Getting r-ped in the front yard of your house, in broad daylight, while there’s people inside? The girl must come up with something more convincing. I think the mom just came up with the story to be able to get an abortion legally, because in most states incest and r-pe are the only exceptions to the abortion ban. That’s why some conservatives are against these exceptions, because women will lie about getting r-ped to get an abortion. Police should collect the child’s DNA. The father will show up in a database sooner or later.
Edit: yea, just keep down voting like cowards without giving a counter argument, cuz you don’t have one!
First off the guy needs more time in jail. 2nd can’t The Hill get a picture of the building burned or prior? Using a random PP from Utah as the pic is stupid.
4 indictments (so far), 94 charges (so far), RICO charges, many of us watched in realtime as all this dumb shit was happening as it was fucking obvious, overwhelming proof, even his own people have turned on him, now law and order is coming for him and his useful idiots.
I’m sure your either a paid troll, or a pol/ edgelord troll, or perhaps someone who has been a victim of the propaganda machine - this post is hoping you have just been a victim of the rightwing outrage and misinformation media industrial complex, and I hope you get better
That does seem to be the Republican strategy. Well, prosecute your opposition’s children anyway. But it doesn’t seem to be working out the way they’d hoped.
"how the children obtained guns"? The article gives no indication that there were multiple guns. Your editorializing makes it sound like they were playing with guns and shooting at each other.
The story is bad enough as it is without you lying about it.
Yeah, I know that’s a typo, but now I want to know what NPC News is like. “Today, several PCs rampages through the streets and caused $10 million in property damage.”
The line you quoted as “editorializing” (“how the children obtained guns”) is literally a line pulled directly from the article subheader. In other words, there’s no editorialization from OP. Like, you do realize that… right? By your replies, I can’t tell if you’re just trolling hard or that oblivious.
If you'd kept up with the thread, you would know you're like the third person to point that out. It is editorializing; I just didn't recognize the correct source.
news
Top
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.