On the one hand, firing a blank in the air is harmless. On the other hand, how fucking close was he that the kid was as injured as he was from the blank?
They’re basically just doing what the SCOTUS did punting the decision downstream. It’s up to the states and ultimately the people of those states to decide.
Stewart chose one of the things he cared about the most, and he stuck with it for the long haul. Mad respect.
That’s staying on message.
There’s young people who were born after 9/11 who are adults now. Would any of them even know that this had happened to 9/11 troops if it weren’t for the efforts of someone like Jon Stewart, still clanging the bell 23 years later?
Come on. It didn't fire, he accidentally pulled the trigger while trying to pull back the hammer - I wouldn't be surprised if he barely uses the fucking thing because it's a security blankie to him and not a dangerous tool of destruction. I hate this passive language bullshit when it comes to things people obviously did.
This is the courts, not a throwaway internet comment.
Personal opinion, if your lawyers suck so bad they can’t figure this shit out the first time, maybe they shouldn’t be allowed to refile.
Like, the number of times right wing lawyers do wrong shit because they don’t actually know what they’re doing is really high at this point, and maybe as a society we should be saying “No, if you’re not smart enough to know WHO you’re suing, you probably don’t deserve to sue them to begin with, because it calls into question the integrity of the questions you bring to the court when you cannot get basic factual details correct.”
We all know it’s a fucking bad-faith argument anyway, so what gives, why do we always give them a chance to argue in bad faith in a court of law? What the fuck.
news
Oldest
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.