I’m in Indiana. We don’t have bears, but we have plenty of dead deer by the side of the road and plenty of rural folk. I have yet to see someone pick one up and put it in their car for later.
Common Dreams - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Common Dreams:
> MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
> Wikipedia about this source
Tfw they’ve convinced you that that ability to search for something on the internet is a market function that needs to be owned and sold, not just an action people can take to look for things. Sad days.
The decision by the justices came in response to Missouri’s lawsuit claiming that the case against Trump infringed on the right of voters under the U.S. Constitution to hear from the Republican presidential nominee as he seeks to regain the White House
What the fuck did I just read? The voters’ rights, whatever the fuck they are, have zero bearing on Trump’s rights as an individual. He would have broader rights to talk shit, within legal limits, if he wasn’t a convicted felon. Now that he’s a felon, his rights are curtailed. That’s how it fucking works, idiots.
This is akin to me claiming that I have the right to hear someone lay out a specific, actionable plan to shoot trump in the face, at a predetermined date and time, described in exquisite, premeditated detail, during a fucking CNN interview or whatever, and that person can do so without violation of the law. Because that is, after all, my right. As determined by me.
Voice of America - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Voice of America:
> MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
> Wikipedia about this source
Not a single one of those commandments apply to U.S. law universally.
Not even “thou shalt not kill” (thanks to the Castle Doctrine and stand-your-ground laws) and “thou shalt not steal” (thanks to civil asset forfeiture).
So even for those two, which are the only two which our laws reflect, there are extenuating circumstances.
CNBC - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for CNBC:
> MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
> Wikipedia about this source
I’ve heard people say that they know it’s unconstitutional and their goal is to get someone to sue over it and take it to SCOTUS so SCOTUS can rule in their favor and give them free reign to violate the 1st amendment all they want.
news
Oldest
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.