Im no expert, but I do know that the US seems to be going after taxes from the wealthy rn. A determined IRS probably has the standing to keep the money, at least most of it.
Given the antitrust suits also coming up the last year or so, id say more is coming, too.
This isn’t that kind of situation. Uranium has been mined here for decades. Even with that though, the issues the Navajo Nation has faced aren’t really radiation related, they’re mining related, as usual with nearly all types of mining since regulations to prioritize minimal negative environmental impact are basically non-existent. This mining just happens to be a radioactive element as opposed to something more benign like copper.
From the article you clearly didn’t read:
The Navajo Nation said it wanted to ensure it had time to coordinate emergency preparedness plans and other notifications before hauling began. Energy Fuels said it notified federal, state county and tribal officials about two weeks ago that hauling was imminent and outlined legal requirements, safety and emergency response.
The tribe said it didn’t expect hauling to begin for at least another month, based on months of conversations with Energy Fuels.
It seems like Energy Fuels either straight up lied about the timing for whatever reason, or they moved up their timetable without telling anyone because they aren’t strictly required to by law. Which definitely seems shady. Why wouldn’t you notify everyone involved that the timetable has been accelerated?
BBC News Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)> Name: bbc.com> Bias: Left-Center
> Factual Reporting: High
> Country: United Kingdom
> Full Report: mediabiasfactcheck.com/bbc/
Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News
FooterBeep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.
Japan may also argue the boarding of the Shonan Maru No 2 was an act of piracy. Under the convention, Japan would need to show the boarding was a case of:
illegal acts of violence or detention, or any act of depredation, committed for private ends by the crew or the passengers of a private ship or a private aircraft, and directed […] on the high seas, against another ship or aircraft, or against persons or property on board such ship.
The sticking point for Japan may be whether or not the boarding can be considered to be for “private ends”.
I don’t see how that’s going to be an issue for Japan. I mean, that text isn’t going to be talking about personal versus organizational or broader ideological ends, if that’s what the author is thinking here. It’s going to be talking about whether he’s acting on behalf of a government or not. It’s to separate things like state actors from non-state actors. I am confident that no government is going to assert that he was acting on their direction in doing that: he wasn’t acting as part of a country’s navy.
I’m a Fiscally Responsible Republican and this is HORRIBLE and SAD for Coca Cola! They should be able to KEEP that 6BILLION dollars! We should instead Tax HOMELESS PEOPLE and SINGLE MOTHERS instead!
UNRELATED to this but THANK YOU REPUBLICANS for BLOCKING Child Tax Credits and Free School Lunches for Starving Children. We just DON’T have it in the Budget!
The mystery is that you would die from lack of water (or exposure, depending) long before you would get that emaciated, or the 40 days she was apparently there.
You would have riots on your hand if people couldn’t get their Coca-Cola.
I am not joking.
When Coke changed its formula in the 80s, people were getting so pissed that it was actually kind of getting dangerous. Like executives were getting death threats and newspapers were saying they did it because they were secretly controlled by the USSR.
The pundit was making fun of a record-breaking “White Dudes for Harris” fundraising call on Tuesday’s episode of The Five when he questioned why “any man would vote Democrat,” claiming that it would have to be because of “mommy issues.”
“It’s not the party of virtue, security — it’s not the party of strength — it’s definitely not the party of family. And to be a man and then vote for a woman just because she’s a woman is either childish — that person has mommy issues — or they are just trying to be accepted by other women,” Watters said. “I heard the scientists say the other day that when a man votes for a woman, he actually transitions into a woman.”
I was thinking that that last line could be a joke, but I would need to hear the delivery. You never know
New York Times Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)> Name: nytimes.com> Bias: Left-Center
> Factual Reporting: High
> Country: United States of America
> Full Report: mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-times/
Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News
FooterBeep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.
news
Oldest
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.