A variance permit for something with a “zone number” referenced like that isn’t going to be decided by an HOA its going to come from a local zoning law. So I don’t think an HOA has anything to do with this. To me it reads like a property buyer is interested in the place contingent on if they get that zoning law for 35ft wavered to 20ft for either an addition on the place or maybe knock it down and building their own joint.
There is nothing in the actual article that states what the hoa decision was/is.
The reality is it is highly unlikely the hoa would even try to tear down the house. And even if the hoa doesn’t grant a variance for a building that already exists, a simple visit to a judge would fix it.
The house has existed for twelve years, it’s basically grandfathered in. And the house can’t be sold until the vote is held…, big deal? A vote like this usually happens pretty fast. It’s probably already taken care of.
The article is basically about a Reddit post. That doesn’t sound like a very reliable news source.
The Primetime Event on Apple TV is hilarious. It is pouring rain so Messi is going to come out and just get drenched at midfield. The broadcasters also aren’t under cover and are just soaked trying to talk and conduct interviews
The projections are reliable, and stark: By 2050, people age 65 and older will make up nearly 40 percent of the population in some parts of East Asia and Europe. That’s almost twice the share of older adults in Florida, America’s retirement capital. Extraordinary numbers of retirees will be dependent on a shrinking number of working-age people to support them.
news
Active
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.