There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

linux

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

kenkenken , in Which distro do you find the most visually appealing?
@kenkenken@sh.itjust.works avatar

GNOME

Pacmanlives , in Immutable distros recommindation?

Opensuse Micro

kenkenken , in Immutable distros recommindation?
@kenkenken@sh.itjust.works avatar

Fedora Silverblue, but OK, well, maybe openSUSE Aeon also.

geoma ,
@geoma@lemmy.ml avatar

I had rhe idea fedora atomic was so reliable, ,but I just updated a system and it broke… Reminded me of my manjaro times😑

Chewy7324 ,

How did it break, and what doesn’t work any more?

I’ve been using Fedora Atomic on at least one device for years now, without any major issues (I.e. device no booting or updating. Upgrades do require some manual intervention).

geoma ,
@geoma@lemmy.ml avatar

I upgraded with rpm-ostree upgrade and then it doesnt boot. Some error with the kernel. Im sorry I dont have the info where I am, as it is not my computer. Good thing is I can still boot old image, its on grub.

geoma ,
@geoma@lemmy.ml avatar

Check out this slrpnk.net/post/11177440

MonkderDritte , in Which distro do you find the most visually appealing?

You mean the default setup of the desktop?

…Reminds me of this.

probably_a_robot , in Help choosing distro for old EOL Chromebook

You could give FydeOS a shot. It’s based on ChromiumOS so if you like the ChromeOS experience, you’ll get to keep it. I believe it also has Linux app support and optional Android app support.

southsamurai , in Which distro do you find the most visually appealing?
@southsamurai@sh.itjust.works avatar

You’re asking about the desktop environment and its default settings, which may or may not be the same on any given distro.

But I have a tie between Plasma and Cinnamon (mint’s DE). They both take only minor tweaking to get where I want them, and I can use them both out of the box with zero complaints.

LeFantome ,

Many distros customize the colour schemes and theming of their desktops. The out-of-the-box XFCE in EOS looks nothing at all like vanilla XFCE for example.

TCB13 , in Which distro do you find the most visually appealing?
@TCB13@lemmy.world avatar

Anything with GNOME is visually appealing but unfortunately the usability is pure garbage. KDE is the exact opposite and Xfce is quick but sits on an awkward place.

jeffreyosborne , in Nobara Linux Inconsistent Boot Problem

It seems that your boot partition is ext4, not sure about that

Zucca , in Which distro do you find the most visually appealing?

Gentoo.

WhiteBerry , in Which distro do you find the most visually appealing?

Honestly, whilst I would not recommend this at all, I find CutefishOS (you could argue it doesn’t even need to be a distro) incredibly visually appealing.

Perhaps I will get downvoted for being a sucker for modern visuals, but the theme is consistent, simple and easy on my eyes.

Although I like GNOME, the consistency bothers me and some of the design choices are inconsistent and don’t make for a great user experience, looking at Nautilus for example.

Static_Rocket , in Which distro do you find the most visually appealing?
@Static_Rocket@lemmy.world avatar

It’s dead now, but Apricity was the first distro I really enjoyed the look of. Now I know better than to care about out of box appearance.

bigmclargehuge ,
@bigmclargehuge@lemmy.world avatar

Out of the box experience is valuable though. No every user wants to tinker for an afternoon to make a system suit their needs. Some want to install and go, nothing wrong with that.

Static_Rocket ,
@Static_Rocket@lemmy.world avatar

Out of box experience is a personal preference. It always has been. Every person expects something different so I don’t really care about it anymore.

Blaster_M , in Anything special to deal with if upgrading CPU generation?

Pretty much… as long as you didn’t do any custom kernel stuff or driver blacklisting or any other underhood voodoo with the boot system.

Chewy7324 , (edited ) in Immutable distros recommindation?

Fedora Atomic is greag. uBlue is better ootb, but most of it can be simply achieved by layering some packages (rpm-fusion, enable auto updates through /etc/rpm-ostreed.conf).

NixOS is a whole nother beast and I’d only recommend it if you use standalone compositors (labwc, hyprland, sway, wayfire, river, …), or want a declarative system.

Edit: Just read your comment about not liking Fedora. In that case I’d recommend OpenSUSE Tumbleweed. Other immutable distros are smaller and I don’t have any experience with them. (IMO with atomic distros the distro doesn’t matter much because apps are installed through flatpak or distrobox anyway.(

Suoko , in Which distro do you find the most visually appealing?
@Suoko@feddit.it avatar

DDE?

GenderNeutralBro , in Anything special to deal with if upgrading CPU generation?

I did a similar upgrade last year. I don’t recall any problems under Debian. I now have Bluetooth and Wi-Fi, which my old mobo did not support.

Of course, you should be sure to do a full backup.

moody OP ,

I don’t have anything important to back up, I would just like to avoid reinstalling everything, particularly my Steam library.

If I can save myself the trouble, that’s all I want. I know Windows doesn’t like that kind of upgrades and you end up with a ton of useless drivers sitting around for nothing, but I haven’t been on Windows in a couple years.

BlueEther ,
@BlueEther@no.lastname.nz avatar

Windows is better these days (or at least last time I did a drive swap on win 10)

I have taken bare metal linux/BSD and gone vm and back with disk passthrough without issue (Xeon => vm on Xeon => i5 13xxx => vm on i5)

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines