Actually, if we’re nit-picking, it means “Personal Computer”, but the colloquial meaning has shifted somewhat since the good old IBM times to first mean desktop computers (as opposed to laptops), and then to mean non-Apple computers (including laptops), which for most people means “a computer that runs Windows.”
It would have been anything that implements Bios enough to boot MS-DOS, more or less.
But now that’s not what anyone actually wants anymore since Windows, the thing people usually boot, wants UEFI instead. So I would say now it is probably anything that can run x86 code and boot Windows, even if it’s from System76 and meant to run Linux.
Most of the time I’m just happy using links. Of course I have graphical browsers like hardened Firefox and ungoogled chromium, but when I just need text, I reach for links, which is about 95% of the time.
People need to experience something before they can ascertain if it is a viable option. Install Ubuntu or Linux Mint on a secondary device, let her see how familiar it is to her.
Then you can explain some of the other advantages of using Linux.
Seconding this! I’ve had the best success by using Linux to revive people’s old laptops that just couldn’t run other modern OSes fast enough, and if they’ve been impressed enough, they’ve ended up installing it on their other devices. Even if not (say, if it didn’t support some applications required for work, for example), they’ve usually at least kept it on said laptop.
Why bad news? It means that there’s an universal package with official support for every distro instead of them just supporting Debian/Ubuntu and everything else being just… kinda there and unnoficial.
I am not in favour of these flatpacks/snaps or whatever these things are called. Packages should be distro packages, always. And the vendor of the software should never be responsible of packaging, thats literally the job of the distribution.
From what I remember a few years ago, it’s not like Wine where you can run a bunch of applications (simply because they’re not as big and don’t have the contributors). So you won’t be running any GUI apps at all, just some low level stuff here and there.
Hey so I’ve had a lot of help in life and this is one step I’ve mastered with my friends. I can tell you how to do it, but not everyone has the motivation to follow this. If you don’t, I’m sorry but this won’t work for you.
THE MINDSET
Landing your first job comes from several steps:
You need a good resume
You need a lot of applications
You need to get a lot of interviews
You need to be good at interviews
(Note that 4 is after 3 because your first bunch of interviews will be about practice, not getting the job. It’s free practice!)
THE RESUME
The resume is not a one step process. It’s something that you should redesign and iterate on as time goes by. I personally wrote my resume in LaTeX since it stands out more than the black on white ones. If you to do this, create an account on Overleaf.com and ping me your username, I’ll share you a copy of mine that you can just fill out with your info.
THE APPLICATIONS
This is the most crucial step, and the one people screw up. This is the step that you must listen to what I have to say, and you will get a job.
You should be able to apply to a posting in LESS THAN 30 seconds. If you are taking more than 30 seconds, you are doing it wrong.
Why?
It’s up to the company to decide if you’re qualified, not you. So don’t read the job posting
With ZERO experience, it will take 60-90 applications per interview. At 110 applications an hour, that’s just over 1 interview an hour. You don’t have time to read the posting.
If you’re actually good at computers (you’re on c/Linux afterall), this efficiency level shouldn’t be a problem for you
Once you master this step, you’ve almost got your foot in the door and are ready to start your life. If you can’t do this step, I can’t help you.
Note: If you don’t see “Quick Apply” on anything, get a free VPN and change your location to North America. It’s not there for some countries.
THE INTERVIEWS
The interviews are about 2 things:
Can this guy communicate?
Can this guy code?
THE ORDER OF IMPORTANCE IS AS LISTED. When I ask someone to write an algorithm to find all the prime numbers less than some N and they start making typos in the editor while not talking, I’m not hiring them. If someone writes a brute force O(n^2) solution but talks me through it as they go, they still have a chance.
Let me be clear: If you cannot communicate, I will not hire you even if you have the most optimal solutions.
So how do you communicate?
When solving a problem, legit just explain your thought process. The interviewer will know where you are and give you hints too when you do this ;)
When answering a behavioural question, tell a story
i.e “Tell me about a time you had a successful project, but still weren’t satisfied with the results” you should explain everything from what made you want to start/contribute on the project, to the crux of the problem, and to what you did to make it better in the end
Check out this guide on the STAR method if you have a hard time with this (trust me - it works!)
THE OFFERS
When negotiating the offer, note a few things:
The salary range for the title in that area
If they ask how much you want, give a RANGE - The lowest being the 60k or the bare minimum you’ll accept (whichever is higher, if you think you’re worth less than 60k you’re just wrong), and the highest being 90-100k for your first position
Don’t feel pressured to accept your offer right away - you get raises by switching jobs, not doing well; start this early, get multiple offers, and pick the best one
I’m past the point in my life of getting that “first job”, but I’ve been there. You have to understand something: People don’t like being uncomfortable, but your comfort zone won’t get you a job. Do it. You can do it.
Let’s try to be respectful of each other. I’m sure the devs of Elementary have their own vision and goals of their platform. They give their users an option to use their work for free and with no obligations. Why on earth would you bash their work when you obviously are not their target demographic.
It’s really not fair to call their users stupid either.
I really expected to find more evolved discussions on lemmy compared to reddit. Let’s stop the silly, meaningless bashing of opposing opinions or even worse personal attacks. Let’s not let this platform devolve into mob mentality.
And by the way I’m not the target demographic either. I’m a software developer using arch wherever I can.
linux
Newest
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.