There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

lemmy.world has bent the knee to corporations. Consolidated comments into body.

I don’t think this is EEE, I think this is a chance for meta to dominate the narrative by drowning us out with algorithmically curated censorship, distractions, hatred, outrage etc. I would join threads if I want threads, I would be on Reddit if I want corporate influence.

The mastodon post for the same server admins admitting to allow Meta thanks @BrikoX and @Melco

This is the post regarding an admin of fosstodon being offered a secret meeting under a non disclosure agreement

Thanks lunar for articulating my central point better than I could.

Most of my primary content was within the comment section scattered so I’ll try to put it up here and edit more as i go. I was worried I’d butcher things so I avoided updating my post. Ignore the mess

–

EEE - I don’t want to talk specifically about this. Many others are, and you can talk with them about it.

–

Privacy - My views on privacy is that lemmy is already fully public and facebook merging into it probably wont reduce your lemmy privacy in any meaningful way. Ignoring lemmy, your privacy is already fully breached in ways I’m not going to explain here.

–

People keep making blind claims that facebook/meta can’t use their algorithms to interact with us, so i will explain. For the record I know most of this effects mastodon directly, and not so much lemmy.

Threads will be able to control what gets minimised and maximised based on whatever secret algorithms they use. These end results are known to people that want to know, it’s how our parents and grandparents, became increasingly detached from reality. If facebook/meta wants to censor their users, they will, if they want to promote hate against LGBTQs then they will. Those users will then interact with our users, slowly shifting our conversations and the overall culture of lemmy into the same cesspool that is facebook.

Secondly, the content of threads will be selected by a relatively massive userbase which will drown out our content if we stay federated. Of course that content will be optimised by their algorithm, thus influencing fediverse content.

–

Now onto the principle matter. FACEBOOK IS EVIL, like genocidal evil, a propaganda arm of the empire evil. They have a heavily proven track record. “Wait and see”? There is no need to ignore facebook/metas criminal record.

The admins here should have clearly stated their intent but have been deafeningly silent. People are asking for clarification or in my case, acting because of a clear lack of action.

Other posts are talking about this and I will assume you have been reading them.

– pjhenry is a troll that ignores what people actually say, he focuses on his intentional misunderstandings and straw-men, just stop feeding the troll guys, he only wants to fight over nothing. He only acts in bad faith.

pjhenry1216 ,

Aaaaand the argument is moot.

https://fortune.com/2023/07/06/mark-zuckerberg-replacing-metaverse-with-twitter-killer-threads-fediverse/ (may be paywalled, it worked for me once, but visiting again it was blocked)

Threads isn't going to be one instance. Threads is gonna be like Kbin or Lemmy. Users can set up their own instances. So you can't simply defederate from Threads as a whole. I'm sure there will be some primary instances one can defederate from, but this preemptive motion to do so seems misguided and may not even be possible as we don't truly know what the domain will end up being.

pjhenry1216 ,

In response to your update about the algorithm, I highly suggest reading how ActivityPub publishes posts. This won't be as much of a concern as you think. It'd require breaking the spec entirely. It would literally not be compatible with other instances if they had a real-time algorithm like that. The only thing it can truly effect is if you browse Threads directly. Even then, there are certain standards it has to follow if it wants to be compatible. More than likely, you will get a "diminished" Threads experience (ie: you will not see any "benefit" of any Threads specific functionality). They already stated if you apply Thread specific privacy controls, it simply won't be posted to the federated feed. It's important to realize their actual feed will not be the same as the federated feed. I do not think Meta wants to capitalize on the fediverse. I think they're doing it as an inexpensive option to be available in the EU without having to interoperate with direct for-profit competitors.

Again, some folks won't be sold on the mess federating with Threads will look like. Let it play out and if you are correct, they will defederate very quickly and there won't be any lasting harm. Meta will gain nothing. You will have stressed and lost years off your life for worrying so much.

Just drink some tea and watch the sunset or something.

irkli ,
@irkli@lemmy.world avatar

Oh please, spare us the silly drama.

Consider reading this brief explanation of the issues by one of the ActivityPub authors…

blog.joinmastodon.org/…/what-to-know-about-thread…

pinkdrunkenelephants ,

If personal attacks are the only response you can give, then they’re clearly right and you’re clearly wrong.

STUPIDVIPGUY ,

“drama”? that faq thing doesn’t change the fact that we don’t respect meta and don’t want to share a platform with them

and it’s no surprise the authors of the software are supportive of its mass adoption, that doesn’t mean I have to tolerate a shitty company

milicent_bystandr ,

we don’t respect meta and don’t want to share a platform with them

I guess a big part of the dilemma is, though we mightn’t respect meta, some of us respect some of the people who use their services - even like some of them - and would like to be in the loop with them without using meta’s services ourselves directly

I’m on a Lemmy instance that’s preemptively defederated, and I respect that, but I might think about creating an account on another instance so I can have interoperability … That said, I’ve done pretty well almost entirely ignoring Facebook and Instagram so far, so maybe I just won’t care enough

samokosik ,
@samokosik@lemmy.world avatar

Is there any way how to move account into another instance? Basically so I don’t lose posts.

I myself am interested what lemmy.world’s admins will do. Now they get a lot of criticism for not doing anything but so far I wouldn’t blame them that much.

PS: I would probably still defederate if it was my decision

Emanresu OP ,

You would have to make a new account. Not sure how i feel about not having account migration. It’s got its good and bad points. Sad to make a second account though.

Galaxyboy_3598 ,

I was going to switch from lemmy.world to lemmy.ml but disappointed that I’d be losing all my comment & post history. Not to mention you have to re-subscribe to all your communities again.

rowdyrockets ,

deleted_by_author

    •
    GONADS125 ,

    Is there any way to move a community? I created !vans but I will not be hosting this community on this instance if it federates with Threads. Also going to stop donating to Lemmy.world if this is the route they will take.

    skellener ,
    @skellener@kbin.social avatar

    We want to prevent enshittification. Not encourage it.

    mintiefresh ,

    Man… I just got here.

    MyOpinion ,

    This grand standing and these purity tests about threads are sickening.

    WhoRoger ,
    @WhoRoger@lemmy.world avatar

    I’m not surprised, but disappointed. And I’m even tired to talk about it. It’s just so fucking dumb.

    Emanresu OP ,

    fosstodon has the same stance as lemmy.world. I don’t know if they have a lemmy.

    WhoRoger , (edited )
    @WhoRoger@lemmy.world avatar

    Wait, did I read something wrong… I thought they were like “we don’t want to talk to Meta at all”.

    Edit: oh yes I see.

    jerdle_lemmy ,

    It’s all getting a bit Judean People’s Front around here. I know there’s a generally leftist userbase, but do we have to do this?

    That’s less about defederating with Meta. Meta are the Romans. It’s about people defederating with anyone who federates with Meta.

    Lunar ,
    @Lunar@lemmy.world avatar

    Thank you for pointing out that this is so much worse than just EEE. Meta has a long history of social and political engineering, and deliberately creating a toxic environment that turned all of our parents and grandparents into deranged conspiracy theorists. They don’t just let hate thrive on their platform, they artificially inflate it in the name of engagement and profit.

    I see no reason to assume they won’t do all of this again, and should they do it all again it’s going to impact the entire Fediverse. Even if you just stick to instances that block Meta, if you’re federating with instances that aren’t, the toxic environment Meta is likely to build will come back to you. If the majority of instances fail to block them, I can’t bear to stay here and watch what has become the internet’s most healthy and vibrant community rot from the inside.

    I honestly don’t understand why this is even a debate. If even a fraction of the shit meta has pulled was done by a smaller Fediverse instance, we all wouldn’t hesitate to defederate from them.

    And to those of you who justify Threads because Meta is somehow the lesser of two evils compared to Twitter, please remember that while Twitter is owned by a raging and incompetent manchild, Meta has eroded democracies and played a major role in a genocide. Don’t fucking support these murderers. Meta is more than happy to spread even more hatred and killing in the world if it boosts their profits.

    Emanresu OP ,

    Thank you so much for being the first to properly understand the threat I was trying to express. You said it so much better than I could at the time.

    I think the reason we are debating is because there are already bots and bad actors working hard to change and forge opinion. I think this style of fediverse just died, but we are close to easily making a new better one.

    pjhenry1216 ,

    I'm gonna need to see an argument on how Threads' toxicity will reach places that are at least once removed. You can't just use it as evidence when it's not even clear it would happen. It's like saying this community is already tainted because there are folks who also have Instagram accounts. If it's not via people spreading the toxicity, I'm all ears to hear your reasoning. Cause it's far from just being obvious.

    What are you even arguing anyway? You're saying defederating Threads isn't even enough. There's no sign they'll even federate beyond platforms of similar concept (micro logging as opposed to link sharing/exchange).

    Are you just saying by simply existing, if everyone doesn't defederate them, the fediverse dies?

    Emanresu OP , (edited )

    Your reply is a perfect example of how threads actions are causing toxicity in lemmy.world.

    edit: Id just like to point out that at no point does he respond about meta being evil and unworthy to associate with, which is the important part he should be talking about.

    pjhenry1216 ,

    I'd argue your attacking of other people shows that Threads isn't the reason behind people being toxic. Folks like you simply exist.

    SeatBeeSate ,

    I'm getting sick of these "time to leave" posts about people wanting to jump ship on each sites decision. Beehaw decided they only want peaceful severs, time to leave. Lemmy.ml was founded by communists, time to leave! Lemmy.world doesn't instantly defederate from other instances, time to leave!

    You can't just continually shuffle the community from site it site.

    Sentinian ,

    While a entire community can’t convince itself to leave, the beauty of the fediverse is if you as a user want to leave it’s very easy to switch instances and get access to most of the same info you want.

    gelberhut ,
    @gelberhut@feddit.de avatar

    If you only scroll-read here - then, yes, it is easy

    Sentinian ,

    I certainly post and read. I’m happy with my instance currently, but should lemmy.one does something I don’t agree with I will have no problem switching.

    sin_free_for_00_days ,

    People are so weird. Their online presence means so much to so many. I want to reply to all of them, just switch instances. As important as they feel, nobody is going to bat an eye when they move, yet they feel that they are really losing something if they do.

    Sentinian ,

    I’m glad someone realizes it. Online presence is something you want to be worthless. If people see worth in that can lead to a set of problems you don’t want.

    pozbo ,
    @pozbo@lemmy.world avatar

    It’s almost like this constant ‘call to leave’ is meta’s Trojan horse.

    A way to create discourse, lower patience of users and make them question their new home away from corporate enshittification.

    I just ignore posts like this, as a partially functional human I am able to form my own opinions and draw my own lines in the sand.

    samokosik ,
    @samokosik@lemmy.world avatar

    I agree with you. We should not kill them for not defederating immediatelly

    DrNeurohax , (edited )
    @DrNeurohax@kbin.social avatar

    I don't WANT to agree, but I kinda do.

    We're here because Reddit was shit on top shit, led by gaping anus. We all accept that Meta is the same.
    We didn't want Reddit profiting from our work. Meta will do the same, only more competently.

    Defederation is useless at scale They can continually spin up new instances that act as spies and bridges to Meta's area.
    Once enough Meta bridge nodes are woven into the Fedi, they'll be masked by a backchannel to mask the exchange/activity.

    Someone plz tell me I'm wrong, but this is how I think things work in the background...

    • Bob creates a Lemmy node - @Zucc1.ughfuckoff. It has 3 users and basically shops around until someone in lemmy.world's sphere allows federation. Zucc1 looks like any random, small instance.
    • Once federated, Zucc1 syncs to its connected Lemmy instances - for now there is no Meta connection.
    • Zucc1 can then federate with a bunch of other instances, including Zucc2.
    • This repeats for a few weeks, infiltrating Fedi. This could be happening now.
    • A new set of Lemmy nodes spin up and federate only with a portion of the spy instances. The spy instances don't respect the federation rules, distributing portions of the Fedi sync back to the Meta connected nodes, masking the source and destination.
    • Once signed posts are received by the spy nodes, user names are swapped with a table synced by spy and bridge instances. @User1 becomes @User7.
      • The Threads user sees their message from @someone (which can also be swapped if they worry Threads users care about any of this stuff).
      • The Lemmy user sees the message from @User.

    Probably easy to combat when it's one instance here and there. If it's constant and automated, federating would have to be paused until the spies are weeded out and there's a better detection strategy. If they get a big enough network going, they could all dip out at once, change identity, and refederate back in as the Fedi network flips out because of all the sync mismatches. Just more new nodes joining in. They have the source code, so they can act differently from other instances as long as it doesn't cause problems.

    Is this a realistic scenario or am I way off base? I feel like it has to be one of the two.

    AVeryCleverName ,

    I think it’s absurd to give Meta the shadow of a benefit of the doubt. in the past, they have explicitly stated their intention to make facebook the internet. If zuck had his way, there would be exactly one website, a monolith collecting your data to more efficiently serve you ads. There is no world in which their participation in the metaverse is not self serving and a net loss for the rest of us.

    open_world ,
    @open_world@lemmy.world avatar

    I don’t think there’s anything wrong with a wait-and-see approach.

    Emanresu OP ,

    We know the history of Meta. We ignore the history to wait and see.

    pjhenry1216 ,

    This is literally FUD. Unless you can provide actual details of what the problem actually would be, you're just spreading fear with no basis.

    emptyother ,
    @emptyother@lemmy.world avatar

    I’ll wait and see if Facebook is even gonna end up doing federation correctly. Maybe they wont.

    fross ,

    Given the relative scales, it’s best to put protection in place, then wait and see.

    If Threads is a positive place, we open up and nothing is lost.

    If Threads is a(nother) cesspit of hate and bots, then we have protected ourselves from it.

    pjhenry1216 ,

    That argument works the other way a lot better. Mainly because a delay of a day or so won't kill anyone and we'd actually see if it's a cesspool and not some random screenshots or hearsay.

    The admin is ready to defederate. Theres no benefit to doing it early.

    fross ,

    I disagree entirely, that’s simply incorrect. You can observe whether it is a cesspool or not whether you federate or not. The federation will not affect it at all. Everyone is able to go and use Threads, we won’t need to rely on “random screenshots or hearsay”, or to federate in order to see whether it’s good or not.

    It’s an unknown quantity, 1000x bigger than the current fediverse. If we federate then block, there is just a mess to clean up. And you know the first few days are going to be a nightmare anyway, as they are with any social media platform, while the controls spin up and new ways to abuse them are found.

    The benefit to doing it early is to let it land and let the smoke clear before making a judgement, without creating a mess for existing users. This is really obvious.

    pjhenry1216 ,

    I fail to understand your benefit. Defederation is extremely quick. If it's a problem, there's no mess to really deal with. I fail to see what the problem is even if it is problematic for a day or two. No one has actually voiced a real concern that provides a valid benefit to defederating beforehand vs seeing what happens and then defederating. You lose absolutely nothing.

    fross ,

    As you said, “if it is problematic for a day or two”. It could be enormously problematic.

    You fail to understand the benefit, and I don’t need to convince you, it’s still correct :)

    pjhenry1216 ,

    Pretty sure you can't explain what's wrong because you have no idea how ActivityPub works.

    Good rebuttal though. "Just trust me I'm right. Stop asking for details or questions. Just do what I say."

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • [email protected]
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •