Like how OP is trying to hype up IDF as if they didn’t lose a slew of tanks to some Hamas fighters literally walking in with RPGs and probably being as old and as competently trained as high-schoolers.
Eisenhower and Ford are watching in embarrassment as they use a metric ton of the latest in advanced guided weaponry to deal with an insurgency that only has hostages because Mossad was sitting on its ass for a whole year.
Hamas will get crushed eventually, but I’m surprised they kept up this game for so long with only like 200 hostages. Lockheed’s CEO would probably shake hands with their leader if he could for generating such a huge amount of arms sales.
lucky all those people they brutally killed in the first day of the war werent hostages then, or they might make your rosy image of hamas look a bit unbelievable
Violent resistance isn’t gonna be rosy pal. The Nazi’s didn’t go away by asking nicely either. Hamas did pretty neatly with the limited means they had.
The fact that Hamas didn’t intentionally kill any children already puts them on a far higher moral ground than israel.
Natural gas … Gaza. In the mean time less than a million dirt poor Guyanans are sitting on the worlds largest reserve. Getting in on that is way less of an issue for anyone.
You are drawing lines that are not there. Gaza is horrible enough without inventing nonsense around it.
Yeah, I’m rather to eastern-european for a amarican. And there’s more guesswork in the article than there is any relation to logic. Guy states defense gives massive advantage, points out what decides of battlefields, and then glides over the issue of how that will favor Ukraine, particularly in winter, and trips out about what might have happened during some talks, but really he has nothing to back it up either way. Same as for the threefold increase in production. Or how Putin would go about mobilizing this massive population, even if he bothered to check the demography stats of it’s age, or considered why they seem to be very afraid to do so.
I’d be quite interested in a well researched article on Russian chances of winning, but this is some conservative rag bullshit.
You could watch some Perun videos on the subject. But THE question seems to be what victory looks like. Russia never was explicit on their objectives and what they would call a win.
Even if Ukraine would receive less help, Russia is not going to steamroll a country filled with people that know that losing to Russia means they will be starved, beaten and murdered.
I hope we don’t have to find out, but ita going to be a long and bloody road regardless of outcome.
telegraph.co.uk
Hot