I can’t even find the words for how incredibly supercalifragilisticexpialidociously stupid that sounds when I take your lack of argument into consideration
Try to leave your childhood trauma out of this, and we might be able to turn this trainwreck of a discussion into something productive.
[…] your lack of argument […]
Right. It is so obvious from the context that you haven’t even considered the effects that stabilizing the eel population in the Caucasus could have on achieving world peace.
Scientists saying empty space not really being empty doesn’t lend your argumentative vacuum any substance.
So often do I see people starting their comment with some variation of that or “you’re wrong!” But then they basically agree with that the other was saying. People just want to shout and be angry and dominant and not even really reading what the other one is saying.
I feel like on Lemmy I get in more substantive arguments about the subject, and less of the other person playing armchair psychologist when I don’t see it their way.
Yeah but we also have some of the most pedantic people I’ve ever dealt with, who will completely ignore your entire argument because they found a tiny bit of nuance in your word choice that they then cling to like it makes any fuckin sense
telegra.ph
Newest