There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

files.catbox.moe

moipe , to cat in Gaze into the spoon

You ever wonder if your spoon-dimension self can pull you in and switch places and then you are stuck in the spoon dimension and the only other things there are things the spoon is currently reflecting. Then you have to wait for you spoon dimension Doppelganger to let its guard down while eating cereal to have a chance at switching back but it waited for decades to get out and is already keen to your tricks.

FuglyDuck ,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

This is why I only use forks.

I ain’t going back to that spoon, man.

corsicanguppy , to me_irl in me🚫irl

Graham is awesome. I remember working with him 20 years ago as an ISV rep and he’s come such a long way.

Aria , to me_irl in me🚫irl

Adblock users optimise their adblockers to be invisible to adblock-checking code. If your site works well, and is worth visiting, the only change in behaviour you can inspire is people nerfing their own adblockers.

araozu ,

Do they? I remember not long ago I just had to have an ads.js file, and if the user had an adblocker this file wouldn’t load.

So I just had a


<span style="color:#323232;">var ads_enabled = true;
</span>

And I could check if the user had an adblock.

I think most people just install ublock/others and leave it default. When I tried to customize ublock all those lists and regex pushed me away, never tried again since.

Phen ,

Ads can mean many things. It could be short for something (for example Active Directory Settings). I remember getting something legitimate blocked like 10 years ago but nothing in recent years so I imagine the detection got better at dealing with that.

Venomnik0 ,

how is that possible because I’d like to know how to do that in general?

Honytawk ,

In uBlock Origin, you can add filters.

Either those you download from the internet, or you can go add items yourself by clicking the uBlock Origin icon and selecting the “item picker”.

Then just click on the item you want to block.

There are more advanced ways to block stuff, like based upon content. I used this to block all the “suggested for you” posts on Facebook.

Aria ,

Step one is you don’t refuse files from the server, and try to answer as if you have them when asked in js. But the current actual methods and arms race is happening by comparing computed results, how your page is rendered according to your own browser when probed, vs how the detection code expects it rendered. Adblockers do things like lie, or inject things that can look close enough to ads that you pass the tests. You can see how detection works and try to sidestep what it does by looking at libraries like these github.com/sitexw/FuckAdBlock

This one in particular will probably just not run in uBlock out of the box so this one’s pretty easy to sidestep. But you can stuff code like this obscured in your site and another piece of code that checks that it hasn’t been removed. It’s pretty difficult for website develops to win this fight, since ultimately they’re letting us download and render their pages with fairly transparent technology.

TheBlue22 , to me_irl in me🚫irl

Not joking, every time a website asks me to turn off my adblocker, I leave and put it on my blocklist so it never shows up again. Then I simply use their competition instead.

Yawnder ,

It’s ok.

Now come and check out your 1 out of 3 free blogpost of the month!

TheBlue22 ,

LETS GOOOOO

gets adware

TheKingBee ,
@TheKingBee@lemmy.world avatar

i generally go into noscript, poke in the console, or look for a bypass extension, just to spite them.

like sites that disable right click, i scrape them on principle…

jordanlund , to cat in Gaze into the spoon
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

There is no spoon.

gregorum ,

Don’t make me watch that movie. I’ll do it!

dr_jekell ,
@dr_jekell@lemmy.world avatar

You won’t want it, you’re too chicken.

UndulyUnruly ,
@UndulyUnruly@lemmy.world avatar

Buaaagh buagh buagh buagh.

swab148 , to cat in Gaze into the spoon
@swab148@startrek.website avatar

Pondering my spoon

faintedheart , to me_irl in me🚫irl

People will decide what is best for them. Blocking access to websites for having ad blocker or having no ad blocker is an asshole move. I know it is intended for pun, but still.

optissima ,

Encouraging a safer internet is an asshole move?

faintedheart ,

Encouraging and forcing is different. Just because forcing ad blocker on people is aligned with so many people’s view doesn’t mean that it is a great move. Anything that is forced on people is an asshole move.

bellly , to cat in Gaze into the spoon

When you gaze into the spoon, the spoon also gazes into you

MossyFeathers , to noncredibledefense in Hmm this better not awaken anything in me

No, they knew what they were doing.

DragonTypeWyvern ,

Recruiting is tough in 2023.

regdog , to noncredibledefense in Hmm this better not awaken anything in me

That some qualitiy content.

Magnetar , to me_irl in me🚫irl

Since mastodon and lemmy are federated, could one have postet the mastodon toot directly?

Masimatutu OP ,

Think about it like this: even when you link other posts in lemmy, you link them in their home instance, because there is no way to link posts so that everyone gets one to their own instance as you can do with communities in the threadiverse. Neither can you repost it in any meaningful way, since that just means copying the content, which would make it appear as though you said it yourself.

umbraroze , to me_irl in me🚫irl
@umbraroze@kbin.social avatar

I mean, it's totally fashionable to give people who still somehow use Microsoft Internet Explorer scare pop-ups, so why not this?

If you don't run an ad blocker, your browser just isn't safe. This was the security community consensus 15 years ago. Shit sure got worse since then!

Efwis ,

And now you got the likes of google and YouTube that prevent things from working if you do run an ad blocker

PoolloverNathan ,

They try, which ended up just making a certain adblocker much more effective.

Efwis ,

It will be a continuous battle. But, eventually, one or the other will lose

Masimatutu OP , to me_irl in me🚫irl

🕵️ hmmm, corpo shill has been here https://files.catbox.moe/jxfwf0.jpg

amanneedsamaid ,

I’m not sure how, but you can find their username on lemmy 💀

Masimatutu OP ,

Yeah… don’t though. It is bad practice to target people like that

norbert ,
@norbert@kbin.social avatar

On kbin you just go to the comment, click on More -> Activity, and go to the 'reduces' tab.

Sphks ,
@Sphks@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Why the downvotes ? That’s a legitimate response since Lemmy and Kbin are compatible. WHO has downvoted you ? :-)

Shinhoshi ,
@Shinhoshi@lemmygrad.ml avatar

They could comment though instead of just downvote and run like a coward

amanneedsamaid ,

Agreed

can ,

You need to be an admin on a federated instance

UnverifiedAPK ,

That or they’re downvoting low effort comments

0x2d ,

Jerboa user?

Masimatutu OP ,

yep

Dudwithacake ,

Or someone who doesn't like generic comments. You could paste half those on any comment chain. They're the equivalent of an upvote but the commenters felt the need to say it instead. Good downvotes.

wahming ,

I would downvote that crap too. Contributes nothing to the discussion, waste of time and screen space. That’s the comment equivalent of banner ads

blargerer , to noncredibledefense in Hmm this better not awaken anything in me

Some days the internet is just too internet.

gon , to me_irl in me🚫irl

Using ad-blockers is actually better for the environment too.

helenslunch ,
@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

I mean, yes? But also this is like that stupid iPhone setting that diverts your charging to off-peak hours or something. It’s such an incredibly small difference.

gon ,

If it’s worth doing at all, it’s worth doing a little bit.

I believe you’re referring to iPhone’s clean energy charging feature. Here’s my question: if you can use clean energy, why wouldn’t you? It might make very little difference to the environment, but a little difference is still a difference.

Still, using ad-blockers is really not like that iPhone feature:

  1. That feature relies on the grid itself, meaning it’s useless for a lot of people that have basically no clean energy where they live, while ad-blockers can be useful to anyone using the internet.
  2. It may be to the user’s detriment, while ad-blockers improve user experience.
  3. It’s device dependent, whereas ad-blockers are available to virtually everyone, not just iPhone users.
  4. Ad-blockers can be combined with clean energy charging.

The impact ad-blockers can have on the environment is similar to iPhone’s clean energy charging in the same way a healthy diet is similar to eating a carrot. Yes, on the surface level they do just reduce your consumption of fossil fuel-generated energy, but ad-blockers reduce your energy consumption overall, not just trade it for green energy (that still requires tons of fossil fuels to be burned).

Much love,
gon

helenslunch ,
@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

if you can use clean energy, why wouldn’t you?

Because, in this case, it can be incredibly inconvenient. It’s just another bullshit marketing ploy from Apple.

I don’t understand the rest of your comment.

Should you use ad blockers? Yes, absolutely. Is “saving the environment” a legitimate reason? I would argue no.

Sincerely,

xoxo helenslunch

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines