There’s a huge number of these kinds of homes in the southwest. They’re pretty inexpensive and they usually sit on the market for months. They’re in no way investment properties - mine sold a decade later for what I paid for it after sitting on the market for a year.
You have to go into it with eyes open, though. If you’re lucky, you will have your own well on the property. If not, you’ll have a shared well or have to haul your own water. That changes the way you think about showers and laundry. You’re in the middle of nowhere, and your neighbors may range from the nice folks who live a mile over that way to the black helicopter conspiracy theorists. You’ll probably see them rarely but hear them doing target practice in their backyard. Wildlife will very much be a thing. Winters can be rough because if you get snowed in, you’re not going anywhere without owning a plow or snow vehicle. Summers are freaking hot. Water will increasingly be an issue. Internet will be unavailable unless you have a satellite service. You’re going to potentially have a problem with cell service, too.
Some of the problems can be solved by throwing money at it, others are just things you have to adapt to.
I’m just imagining the agent tactfully begging the client to clear those things out and then having to walk it back when the client was just so insulted that such a beautiful collection would make the home look anything less than it’s very best.
OK, replying to myself here rather than individually, as it seemed easier… Maybe I should have posted this to c/mildlyironic, but that’s what caught my attention. There’s no easy way to specify what I consent too here—their ToS, tracking cookies, it’s all or nothing†. And this is a legal requirement only if you’re storing cookies. If your website will work without cookies, just get rid of them instead of asking. If it won’t, make this the landing page and see how much traffic you get (note this would also help with accessibility).
I do use consent-o-matic, but it didn’t help with this one. Never mind, I’m no stranger to devtools, and see this eventually as just a challenge. This site though was pretty tricky. First usual trick is to right click and ‘Inspect’ the overlay, with a view to, ahem, closing it. But this isn’t gadgethacks first rodeo—no, they have a page level click handler installed which repeats the small print, and ends with a double negative “If you do not agree, click Cancel”. There’s no way back to read the ToS or privacy policy without reloading the page.
Oh well, lets start again and open devtools. The content is structured in 3 main bits: a <header>, a <section class=“page-wrapper”> and a <footer>. Well, that’s not too bad, so we can safely delete the header & footer, and that also gets rid of the click handler. Now just a simple matter or finding where overflow: hidden is buried (only 1 div down), and a pesky position: fixed alongside it, and voila we have scroll bars.
I could read all the way to the end of the article, and guess what? It didn’t need cookies after all.
† Perhaps their ToS requires the use of cookies, but, TL;DR;, it doesn’t.
feddit.uk
Top