There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

engadget.com

tal , to technology in Apple reportedly has plans for a thinner iPhone, MacBook Pro and Apple Watch
@tal@lemmy.today avatar

I’m not going to buy any of those, and I don’t use a smartwatch at all, but I’d rather have a thicker laptop and phone with the extra space expended on a larger battery.

LainTrain , to technology in Apple reportedly has plans for a thinner iPhone, MacBook Pro and Apple Watch

Enough with the goddamn thinness soon that shit is gonna snap if you breathe on it

clubb ,
@clubb@lemmy.world avatar

It already has, years ago

user224 ,

iPhone 6: First foldable smartphone

cmnybo , to technology in Apple reportedly has plans for a thinner iPhone, MacBook Pro and Apple Watch

Why? Phones have been thin enough for a long time that you have to put them in a case just to get a good grip.

SatansMaggotyCumFart ,

I want an iPhone with a larger battery so it doesn’t have the stupid camera bulge.

Longer life and doesn’t rock when I text on a surface.

jenny_ball ,
@jenny_ball@lemmy.world avatar

seriously

SatansMaggotyCumFart ,

Oh I’m serious.

sugartits ,

When Satan’s Maggoty Cum Fart says they are serious, then you better believe that Satan’s Maggoty Cum Fart is being serious and take it seriously!

tfowinder ,
@tfowinder@lemmy.ml avatar

And I can repair when it breaks.

tal ,
@tal@lemmy.today avatar

doesn’t rock when I text on a surface.

I mean, I agree with you on the battery life being desirable, but purely in terms of addressing the rocking, does putting it in a rigid case resolve that?

SatansMaggotyCumFart ,

It makes the phone bigger without extra battery life so what’s the point?

I’ve actually never ran a case on my phones just a screen protector.

bdonvr ,

Actually, they’ve been getting thicker every year since the 6, believe it or not.

slaacaa ,

Exactly. I’m still on my 11pro for this reason, already had to replace the battery. I got the 15 as a work phone, it feels very large in comparison, I’m not a fan.

DolphinMath ,

I’d be happier if they push for lighter devices personally. Glass feels nice, but their Pro models can be obnoxiously heavy.

Evotech ,

Because we need to keep innovating?

danielfgom , to technology in Apple seems to have persuaded OpenAI to work for exposure
@danielfgom@lemmy.world avatar

100% correct.

At the moment there are tons of Ai companies all trying to be The One that everybody will use.

But Google has Gemini and it has Android. Android has 70% market share worldwide and is offering Gemini for free to every user. That’s MASSIVE exposure.

For openai to get on Android the user has to install it as an app. It’s VERY difficult to get your average user to know what openai is and why they should use it, never mind getting them to install the app.

So to be the default Ai on iPhone is a HUGE deal for openAi and gives them massive exposure over the competition.

Google pays Apple billions to Apple to be the default search engine so openAi not having to pay anything is actually very surprising to me.

I think the only reason Apple isn’t making them pay is because Apple plans to offer other Ai services in future.

simplejack OP ,
@simplejack@lemmy.world avatar

That’s a really good point.

OpenAI is also pushing pretty hard to get partnerships with Samsung. If they had Apple and Samsung, they’d have half of the phones in the world.

moon , to technology in Apple seems to have persuaded OpenAI to work for exposure

Apple just had the negotiator of the year right there, or OpenAI is really that bad.

It’s especially bad knowing that I’m this setup, all of OpenAI is replaceable in Apple’s code by changing a single line of code and pointing to a different API.

simplejack OP ,
@simplejack@lemmy.world avatar

My guess is that Apple is just able to show OpenAI how good they are at upselling other 3rd party apps into paid subscriptions.

I bet the bargaining chip is, “you can sell GPT Plus, but we won’t take a 15 to 30% App Store cut if you let us send requests to GPT 4 when the dumber Apple LLMs don’t cut it.”

Dragomus , to news in Music publishers accuse Spotify of 'bait-and-switch subscription scheme'

Hmm what am I missing here…

Spotify is raising prices because it wants to sell product “B” next to “A” that it already had. But now the management of Product A is claiming that the extra money from raised prices belongs to them because spotify was selling A first?

That is quite ballsy … granted I expected nothing less from the greedy music industry, but this is quite on a new level.

CleoTheWizard ,
@CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world avatar

Okay so in plain terms (from what I can tell) they’re arguing that Spotify isn’t paying them enough because they have product A and product B. A bundle of A and B has their prices raised but only costs a dollar more than product A with its costs raised. So they’re arguing that they deserve a larger part of product A since B clearly isn’t adding much value to their platform.

Then additionally they claim that by offering product B as a standalone subscription, the price they’re setting for product B only serves to allow Spotify to pay them less for A in those bundles.

This makes sense because it’s a good way to reduce the money paid to the music side of the business by inserting new things into their services and then claiming that the new rate increases are due to that new service (that they don’t have to pay out as much to audio book companies for).

gravitywell , to news in Music publishers accuse Spotify of 'bait-and-switch subscription scheme'

Just canceled mine today, hardly used it the past few years anyway because of funkwhale and yt revanced.

NoSpiritAnimal ,
@NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world avatar

How is Youtube music?

Spotify wants another $2 per month from me for “numerous improvements and fixes”, like putting Joe Rogan right in my face everytime I start up and not shuffling properly.

gravitywell ,

I think ts great! Sound quality is as good or better. Ive always discovered new music more from yt than Spotify personally so it has about 10+ years of my listening habits to go on and it dies a good job finding new stuff I like

While downloading is technically locked for free {even revanced) users ther are appa like newpipe or ytdlp that you can use to rip the audio in various formats. .

For organizing large collections and playlists I think both Spotify and YouTube are not really good but yt music on the desktop/webui is great where Spotify has a better interface for their mobile app. This might be more of a me problem though because I prefer organizing my collection offline using something like ex falso and musicbrains picard.

In terms of music library size they are pretty much equal, I used soundiiz ($5 service) to export and sync my library from spotify to yt and it got most everything, playlists included.

I think overall it might take some adjusting to if you’re very used to Spotify and its UI but its a very suitable replacement.

Melody , to news in Music publishers accuse Spotify of 'bait-and-switch subscription scheme'

It’s clear that they made an end run around the rules, laws and agreements they made.

I hope some judge throws the book in their face for it and forces them to pay out of their profits to the artists at the rate they agreed was fair before they began selling audiobooks.

state_electrician ,

Yeah, but these aren’t the artists, just the big music publishers who are just as predatory as Spotify.

Doom ,

Spotify is predatory and isn’t paying artists enough for their content but a lot of anti spotify news anymore is envious and just as predatory music companies trying to take a bite out of them.

Spotify is no worse than anyone else except very lesser known artists can put their music on here and actually have a chance at exposure that other platforms don’t offer.

Overall 6/10. I’ve tried other music streaming platforms and methods and in my opinion Spotify has what I want. Everyone will price gouge if they could. But I especially will never use YT music.

OsaErisXero , to news in Music publishers accuse Spotify of 'bait-and-switch subscription scheme'

I thought the music companies were the 70%+ shareholders of Spotify

AncientFutureNow , to news in Music publishers accuse Spotify of 'bait-and-switch subscription scheme'

fuuuuuuuuucccccckkkkkkkkkssssssspppppoooootttiiifffffffyyyyyyy

EncryptKeeper , to technology in Apple refuses to call Apple Intelligence 'AI'

No they don’t, they call it AI right at the top of the page advertising it on their website.

www.apple.com/apple-intelligence/

kaffiene , to technology in Apple refuses to call Apple Intelligence 'AI'

Of course not

Eggyhead , to technology in Apple seems to have persuaded OpenAI to work for exposure

Imagine all the training they’ll get from random queries off of the millions of Apple users who don’t even know what chat GPT even is yet.

simplejack OP ,
@simplejack@lemmy.world avatar

I guess it deepened on what the onboarding flow looks like for newbies. The per-query alert is pretty minimal.

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/972b46d2-9710-40e8-ae68-5856e7969bea.jpeg

That said, my original point is that training data gathered from queries is probably not valuable enough to offset the costs of unpaid GP4 query compute for the biggest smart phone manufacturer on earth.

The data is valuable, but for GP4 access, OpenAI would rather scrape chat forums, sell integration licenses, or sell pro licenses to offset all those damn Nvidia chips.

ICastFist ,
@ICastFist@programming.dev avatar

Maybe OpenAI is hoping the cost of a couple million queries within a month will be offset once they start charging for it within a month or two.

simplejack OP ,
@simplejack@lemmy.world avatar

I doubt that’s the play. OpenAI is probably locked into a service contract, and Apple had built the platform so different 3rd party LLMs can be swapped out by Apple or the end user. So if OpenAI breached the contract, Apple could go with a different default model.

Cqrd ,

Supposedly they’re not allowed to use any data obtained from this for training purposes, at least according to the mkbhd video

KeenFlame ,

It’s like telling your water to not run down the drain

Siegfried , to technology in Apple refuses to call Apple Intelligence 'AI'

i AI

reddig33 , to technology in Apple seems to have persuaded OpenAI to work for exposure

It will be interesting to see the upgrade numbers in a year. Do most people not care about AI, or will the user base be wary? Current numbers show around 77% uptake on iOS 17.

wccftech.com/ios-17-adoption-rate-lowe-than-last-…

simplejack OP ,
@simplejack@lemmy.world avatar

My hot take is that the new iMessage features will push adoption rates really high. People in my household want the beta for that reason alone, and I’m having to bat them away because this is a buggy DB1.

A version is Siri that isn’t shit is also a big reason. But that is not coming until 18.1 or 2. So my money is on text effects and stupid emoji reactions being the initial upgrade driver.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines